Literature DB >> 25112590

Uterine morcellation at the time of hysterectomy: techniques, risks, and recommendations.

Jessica E Stine1, Daniel L Clarke-Pearson2, Paola A Gehrig3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Uterine leiomyomata or fibroids are the most common pelvic tumor experienced in women. A minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy has proven benefits of cosmesis, lower blood loss, less pain, decreased hospital stay, and faster recovery. The incidence of uterine morcellation, the process of making a uterine specimen smaller for purposes of removal via a minimally invasive approach, has increased for this reason.
OBJECTIVE: We review the history, techniques, and direct and indirect risks described in the literature, recommendations for appropriate use, and how to counsel patients regarding this procedure. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A thorough search of PubMed for all current literature was performed. Techniques for morcellation were reviewed. We included studies that addressed the type and incidence of morcellator-associated risks including those addressing the incidence of leiomyosarcoma in patients with presumed uterine fibroids.
RESULTS: We have summarized several techniques to aid the practitioner in performing morcellation procedures and the risks involved. We have summarized all of the current consensus statements regarding the recommendations for use of morcellation and the approach to proper counseling. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Morcellation is an effective method of specimen removal that can decrease the need for laparotomy in both benign and malignant conditions. Upon analysis of current data and consensus statements, when possible, morcellation should be performed within a contained environment to minimize any potential tumor spread in the event of an undiagnosed malignancy. Patients should be adequately counseled to make an informed decision regarding undergoing a morcellation procedure. Future methods for enclosed specimen extraction will hopefully change the future of morcellation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25112590     DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  6 in total

1.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Shanti Mohling; Rebecca Mckendrick; Rayan Elkattah; Jenny Holcombe; Robert S Furr; Todd Boren; Stephen DePasquale
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16

2.  Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Large Uteri: Comparison of Uterine Removal by Transvaginal and Uterine Morcellation Approaches.

Authors:  Haibo Wang; Ping Li; Xiujuan Li; Licai Gao; Caihong Lu; Jinrong Zhao; Ai-Ling Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Power Morcellation Using a Contained Bag System.

Authors:  Courtney Steller; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Kirsten Sasaki; Charles E Miller
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Myomectomy by Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: Results at Foch Hospital, Paris.

Authors:  Jennifer Asmar; Marc Even; Marie Carbonnel; Julie Goetgheluck; Aurelie Revaux; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-08-20

Review 5.  Recent scientific advances in leiomyoma (uterine fibroids) research facilitates better understanding and management.

Authors:  Darlene K Taylor; Kristine Holthouser; James H Segars; Phyllis C Leppert
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-07-06

6.  Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Milena Alec; Michel Boulvain; Stas Shabanov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.