Literature DB >> 29453728

Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.

Christos Iavazzo1,2, Evelyn Eleni Minis3, Ioannis D Gkegkes3.   

Abstract

Single-incision approach in robotic gynecology is a relatively new concept. The role of single-port systems in robotic hysterectomy, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the technical challenges, are still under investigation. A systematic review was performed by searching in PubMed and Scopus databases. In 810 out of 1225 patients, hysterectomy was performed for non-neoplastic disease. Single-Site® was the most common port system. Duration of the procedure and relative blood loss ranged from 60 to 311 min and 7 to 750 ml, respectively. The weight of the removed uteri ranged from 39 to 520 g. 4.9% of the included patients presented complications, among which bleeding, vaginal haematoma, laceration and dehiscence, umbilical hernia, and visceral injuries. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached 2.8%. Although some technical difficulties are still described in the literature, the single-port approach is becoming more standardized nowadays and performed by more surgeons. The initial phase of the learning curve can be achieved after five cases, while a proficiency in intracorporeal cuff suturing after 14 cases. Uterus weight and previous abdominal surgical history can still be limitations of the technique. Compared to our previous study, we can see that the technique has been used in more elderly or obese patients. The complication rate can reach 4.9% while the conversion rate can reach 2.8%. However, we consider that complication and conversion rates as well as surgical time could be improved with experience. Regarding post-operative pain and cosmetic outcomes, the lack of information do not allow us to draw any safe conclusions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Laparoendoscopic single site; Robotics; Single incision; Single port; Update

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29453728     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0789-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  36 in total

1.  Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.

Authors:  Mete Gungor; Korhan Kahraman; Polat Dursun; Esra Ozbasli; Canan Genim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-20

2.  Single-Site Robotic Radical Hysterectomy and Sentinel Lymphnode Biopsy in Cervical Cancer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Alexandre Silva E Silva; Rodrigo Pinto Fernandes; Marcia Pereira de Araujo; João Paulo Mancusi de Carvalho; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Giovani Mastrantônio Favero; Jesus Paula Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet       Date:  2016-12-30

3.  Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic?

Authors:  Ali Akdemir; Nuri Yildirim; Burak Zeybek; Semra Karaman; Fatih Sendag
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Eleni K Papadopoulou; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Robotic hysterectomy or myomectomy without power morcellation: A single-port assisted three-incision technique with manual morcellation.

Authors:  Gun Oh Chong; Yoon Hee Lee; Dae Gy Hong; Young Lae Cho; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Alexandre Buckley de Meritens; Julia Kim; Helen Dinkelspiel; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Thomas Caputo; Kevin M Holcomb
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.

Authors:  Stacey A Scheib; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Lena El Hachem; Vaagn Andikyan; Shyama Mathews; Kathryn Friedman; Jashvant Poeran; Kenneth Shieh; Michael Geoghegan; Herbert F Gretz
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Robotic single-site combined cholecystectomy and hysterectomy: Advantages and limits.

Authors:  Nicola Pluchino; Nicolas C Buchs; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Jean Marie Wenger; Philippe Morel; Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-29

10.  Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Jung-Dong Lee; Tae Wook Kong; Suk-Joon Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic indications.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Koo
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2018-12-31

2.  Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.

Authors:  Liliana Mereu; Francesca Dalprà; Saverio Tateo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.