Literature DB >> 28429119

Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.

Mete Gungor1, Korhan Kahraman2, Polat Dursun3, Esra Ozbasli1, Canan Genim1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of robotic single port hysterectomy and laparoscopic single port hysterectomy, and to compare the perioperative parameters of the two systems. Twenty patients underwent robotic single port hysterectomy and 25 patients underwent laparoscopic single port hysterectomy. All hysterectomies were successfully performed via a single port and there were no conversions to conventional multi-port laparoscopy, multi-port robotic, open surgery, or vaginal surgery. The median operative time and hysterectomy time in robotic and laparoscopic groups were 90 vs. 90 min (P 0.74), 57.5 vs. 60 min (P 0.17), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 40 ml in the robotic group and 50 ml in the laparoscopic group (P 0.77). No operative and post-operative complications were observed in the two groups. The median time to discharge from the hospital was one day for both techniques (P 0.17). Robotic and laparoscopic single port systems are feasible and safe for hysterectomy operation in terms of operative time, conversion to laparotomy or multiport laparoscopy/robotic rates, complication rates, and postoperative results in the hands of experienced surgeons. The possible benefits of robotic single port surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy should be evaluated in further randomized controlled studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Single-port surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429119     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  14 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery?

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Ovarian cystectomy for a dermoid cyst with the new single-port robotic system.

Authors:  Mete Gungor; Korhan Kahraman; Esra Ozbasli; Canan Genim
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.442

4.  Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study.

Authors:  Yong-Wook Kim; Byung-Joon Park; Duck-Yeong Ro; Tae-Eung Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?

Authors:  G H Eltabbakh; M I Shamonki; J M Moody; L L Garafano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery.

Authors:  Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Min Jae Kim; Chul Jung Kim; Heeseok Kang; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sandra Lopez; Zuber D Mulla; Loretta Hernandez; Devin M Garza; Thomas N Payne; Richard W Farnam
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Jung-Dong Lee; Tae Wook Kong; Suk-Joon Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Cianci; A Rosati; V Rumolo; S Gueli Alletti; V Gallotta; L C Turco; G Corrado; G Vizzielli; A Fagotti; F Fanfani; G Scambia; S Uccella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 3.  The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulia Armano; Andrea Rosati; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description.

Authors:  Liliana Mereu; Francesca Dalprà; Saverio Tateo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.