Literature DB >> 25255827

Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.

Christos Iavazzo1, Eleni K Papadopoulou, Ioannis D Gkegkes.   

Abstract

AIM: The application of robotics is an innovation in the field of gynecologic surgery. Our objective was to evaluate the currently available literature on the cost assessment of robotic surgery of various operations in the field of gynecologic surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched in order to retrieve the included studies in our review.
RESULTS: We retrieved 23 studies on a variety of gynecologic operations. The mean cost for robotic, open and laparoscopic surgery ranged from 1731 to 48,769, 894 to 20,277 and 411 to 41,836 Euros, respectively. Operative charges, in hysterectomy, for robotic, open and laparoscopic technique ranged from 936 to 33,920, 684 to 25,616 and 858 to 25,578 Euros, respectively. In sacrocolpopexy, these costs ranged from 2067 to 7275, 2904 to 69,792 and 1482 to 2000 Euros, respectively. Non-operative charges ranged from 467 to 39,121 Euros. The mean total costs for myomectomy ranged from 27,342 to 42,497 and 13,709 to 20,277 Euros, respectively, for the robotic and open methods, while the mean total cost of the laparoscopic technique was 26,181 Euros. Conversions to laparotomy were present in 79/36,185 (0.2%) cases of laparoscopic surgery and in 21/3345 (0.62%) cases of robotic technique. Duration of robotic, open and laparoscopic surgery ranged from 50 to 445, 83.7 to 701 and 74 to 330 min, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery has the potential to become cost-effective in centers with many patients while industry competition could reduce the cost of the robotic instrumentation, making robotic technology more affordable and cost-effective.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost; gynecology; health-care economics; outcome; robotics; training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25255827     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  14 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gkegkes; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Christos Iavazzo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-05

2.  Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea M Avondstondt; Michelle Wallenstein; Christopher R D'Adamo; Robert M Ehsanipoor
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-24

3.  Could ICG-aided robotic cholecystectomy reduce the rate of open conversion reported with laparoscopic approach? A head to head comparison of the largest single institution studies.

Authors:  A Gangemi; R Danilkowicz; F E Elli; F Bianco; M Masrur; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-19

Review 4.  Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: an update.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Evelyn Eleni Minis; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16

5.  Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Identifying Hospital Cost Savings Opportunities by Optimizing Surgical Approach for Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Jordan M Cloyd; Thomas E Clancy; Timothy M Pawlik; Stanley W Ashley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Helen Marshall; Julie Croft; Neil Corrigan; Joanne Copeland; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Tero Rautio; Niels Thomassen; Henry Tilney; Mark Gudgeon; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Richard Edlin; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Robotics in general surgery: A systematic cost assessment.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gkegkes; Ioannis A Mamais; Christos Iavazzo
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  The possible role of the da Vinci robot for patients with vulval carcinoma undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Paraskevi Evangelia Iavazzo; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geertje Callewaert; Jan Bosteels; Susanne Housmans; Jasper Verguts; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Frank Van der Aa; Dirk De Ridder; Ignace Vergote; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.