Aim: Comparison between the objective refraction measurement results determined with Topcon KR-8900 standard autorefractometer and Plusoptix A09 photo-refractometer in children. Material and methods: A prospective transversal study was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology of "Sf. Spiridon" Hospital in Iași on 90 eyes of 45 pediatric patients, with a mean age of 8,82 ± 3,52 years, examined with noncycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix A09 and cycloplegic and noncycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon KR-8900 standard autorefractometer. The clinical parameters compared were the following: spherical equivalent (SE), spherical and cylindrical values, and cylinder axis. Astigmatism was recorded and evaluated with the cylindrical value on minus after transposition. The statistical calculation was performed with paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation analysis. All the data were analyzed with SPSS statistical package 19 (SPSS for Windows, Chicago, IL). Results: Plusoptix A09 noncycloplegic values were relatively equal between the eyes, with slightly lower values compared to noncycloplegic auto refractometry. Mean (± SD) measurements provided by Plusoptix AO9 were the following: spherical power 1.11 ± 1.52, cylindrical power 0.80 ± 0.80, and spherical equivalent 0.71 ± 1.39. The noncycloplegic auto refractometer mean (± SD) measurements were spherical power 1.12 ± 1.63, cylindrical power 0.79 ± 0,77 and spherical equivalent 0.71 ± 1.58. The cycloplegic auto refractometer mean (± SD) measurements were spherical power 2.08 ± 1.95, cylindrical power 0,82 ± 0.85 and spherical equivalent 1.68 ± 1.87. 32% of the eyes were hyperopic, 2.67% were myopic, 65.33% had astigmatism, and 30% eyes had amblyopia. Conclusions: Noncycloplegic objective refraction values were similar with those determined by autorefractometry. Plusoptix had an important role in the ophthalmological screening, but did not detect higher refractive errors, justifying the cycloplegic autorefractometry.
Aim: Comparison between the objective refraction measurement results determined with Topcon KR-8900 standard autorefractometer and Plusoptix A09 photo-refractometer in children. Material and methods: A prospective transversal study was performed in the Department of Ophthalmology of "Sf. Spiridon" Hospital in Iași on 90 eyes of 45 pediatric patients, with a mean age of 8,82 ± 3,52 years, examined with noncycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix A09 and cycloplegic and noncycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon KR-8900 standard autorefractometer. The clinical parameters compared were the following: spherical equivalent (SE), spherical and cylindrical values, and cylinder axis. Astigmatism was recorded and evaluated with the cylindrical value on minus after transposition. The statistical calculation was performed with paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation analysis. All the data were analyzed with SPSS statistical package 19 (SPSS for Windows, Chicago, IL). Results: Plusoptix A09 noncycloplegic values were relatively equal between the eyes, with slightly lower values compared to noncycloplegic auto refractometry. Mean (± SD) measurements provided by Plusoptix AO9 were the following: spherical power 1.11 ± 1.52, cylindrical power 0.80 ± 0.80, and spherical equivalent 0.71 ± 1.39. The noncycloplegic auto refractometer mean (± SD) measurements were spherical power 1.12 ± 1.63, cylindrical power 0.79 ± 0,77 and spherical equivalent 0.71 ± 1.58. The cycloplegic auto refractometer mean (± SD) measurements were spherical power 2.08 ± 1.95, cylindrical power 0,82 ± 0.85 and spherical equivalent 1.68 ± 1.87. 32% of the eyes were hyperopic, 2.67% were myopic, 65.33% had astigmatism, and 30% eyes had amblyopia. Conclusions: Noncycloplegic objective refraction values were similar with those determined by autorefractometry. Plusoptix had an important role in the ophthalmological screening, but did not detect higher refractive errors, justifying the cycloplegic autorefractometry.
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Elizabeth L Lazar; B Michele Melia; William F Astle; Linda R Dagi; Sean P Donahue; Marcela G Frazier; Richard W Hertle; Michael X Repka; Graham E Quinn; Katherine K Weise Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-07-11
Authors: Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Jennifer D Davidson; Rupal H Trivedi Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.258