| Literature DB >> 29449678 |
Rodrigo Muñoz-Castañeda1,2, David Díaz1,2, Leticia Peris3,4, Annie Andrieux3,4,5, Christophe Bosc3,4, José M Muñoz-Castañeda6, Carsten Janke7,8,9, José R Alonso1,2,10, Marie-Jo Moutin3,4, Eduardo Weruaga11,12.
Abstract
The cerebellum plays a key role in motor tasks, but its involvement in cognition is still being considered. Although there is an association of different psychiatric and cognitive disorders with cerebellar impairments, the lack of time-course studies has hindered the understanding of the involvement of cerebellum in cognitive and non-motor functions. Such association was here studied using the Purkinje Cell Degeneration mutant mouse, a model of selective and progressive cerebellar degeneration that lacks the cytosolic carboxypeptidase 1 (CCP1). The effects of the absence of this enzyme on the cerebellum of mutant mice were analyzed both in vitro and in vivo. These analyses were carried out longitudinally (throughout both the pre-neurodegenerative and neurodegenerative stages) and different motor and non-motor tests were performed. We demonstrate that the lack of CCP1 affects microtubule dynamics and flexibility, defects that contribute to the morphological alterations of the Purkinje cells (PCs), and to progressive cerebellar breakdown. Moreover, this degeneration led not only to motor defects but also to gradual cognitive impairments, directly related to the progression of cellular damage. Our findings confirm the cerebellar implication in non-motor tasks, where the formation of the healthy, typical PCs structure is necessary for normal cognitive and affective behavior.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29449678 PMCID: PMC5814431 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21470-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effect of pcd mutation on microtubule dynamics and structure (mean ± SEM). (A and B) manual and automatic analyses of microtubules growth and shrinking rates; in both analysis PCD microtubules showed an increase in growing rate. (C) Catastrophe frequency analysis; an increase in the frequency of catastrophes in PCD microtubules is demonstrated. (D–F) Analysis of WT (D) and PCD (E) microtubules curvature and its graphical representation (F); an increase in the curvature of PCD microtubules can be observed. (G–I) Analysis of WT (G) and PCD (H) microtubule trajectory curvature and its graphical representation (I); an increase in the trajectory curvature of PCD microtubules can be observed. *p < 0.05.
Quantification of WT and PCD microtubule dynamics and structure. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
| Microtubules dynamics and structure | ||
|---|---|---|
| WT | PCD | |
| Growing rate | 10.62 ± 0.34 | |
| Shrinking rate | 16.24 ± 1.67 | 21.90 ± 2.51 |
| Growing length | 2.66 ± 0.10 | 2.72 ± 0.14 |
| Shrinking length | 1.73 ± 0.18 | 1.81 ± 0.15 |
| Catastrophe frequency | 0.09 ± 0.01 | |
| % Growing | 92.05 ± 0.65 | 91.20 ± 1.25 |
| % Shrinking | 7.67 ± 0.63 | 8.59 ± 1.19 |
| % Pause | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.10 |
| MTs curvature | 3.39 ± 0.37 | |
| MTs trajectory curvature | 1.20 ± 0.13 | |
Figure 2Morphological analysis of the PCs during postnatal development (mean ± SEM). (A) Micrographs of the PCs at different ages as seen with anti-calbindin immunofluorescence (Cb-28k; red). (B–E) Charts showing the quantification of the studied parameters; note that morphological alterations appear from P15 and onwards, with the soma area/size and the dendritic arbor length being the last to be significantly modified. n = 4 per experimental group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Quantification of the PCs morphology of both WT and PCD mice. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
| PCs morphology | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | PCD | |||||||||
| P7 | P15 | P17 | P22 | P30 | P7 | P15 | P17 | P22 | P30 | |
| Main dendrite length (µm) | 15.99 ± 1.08 | 24.12 ± 2.24 | 27.22 ± 2.04 | 32.49 ± 2.67 | 31.31 ± 2.37 | 17.70 ± 2.22 | 27.25 ± 2.57 | |||
| Main dendrite width (µm) | 3.61 ± 0.25 | 3.61 ± 0.12 | 3.68 ± 0.09 | 2.75 ± 0.11 | 3.24 ± 0.32 | 3.24 ± 0.32 | 2.88 ± 0.29 | |||
| Dendritic arbor length (µm) | 52.42 ± 2.41 | 104.26 ± 1.84 | 108.51 ± 9.30 | 123.25 ± 2.01 | 112.54 ± 8.66 | 45.43 ± 4.06 | 93.00 ± 5.37 | 112.64 ± 8.77 | ||
| Soma area (µm2) | 119.78 ± 6.07 | 131.79 ± 4.23 | 130.87 ± 4.61 | 130.47 ± 4.11 | 139.34 ± 6.23 | 126.28 ± 6.21 | 139.27 ± 9.08 | 146.09 ± 8.27 | ||
Figure 3Analysis of apoptosis along cerebellar postnatal development. (A) Micrograph of a Purkinje cell labeled with parvalbumin (PV, red) and TUNEL (green) in a PCD mouse. (B) Micrograph of an interneuron of the molecular layer labeled with NeuN (red) and TUNEL (green) in a PCD mouse. (C–E) Charts showing the quantification of TUNEL-positive cells in the three cerebellar layers (mean ± SEM). An increase in the number of apoptotic cells can be observed from P22 and onwards in the three cerebellar layers of the PCD mice. n = 4 per experimental group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 4Analysis of motor coordination and home-cage behavior along postnatal development (mean ± SEM). (A,B) Representation and quantification of the rota-rod test. (C–F) Representation and quantification of the parameters analyzed in the home-cage behavior test; i.e. time for grooming, time of environmental exploratory behavior and time displacing. Note the differences derived from the pcd mutation for all parameters, except for displacement. n = 8–9 per experimental group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 5Analysis of the novel object recognition test along postnatal development. (A) Schematic representation of the test and the objects employed. (B–D) Analysis of the percentage of time exploring familiar and novel objects at different ages for both WT and PCD mice (mean ± SEM); a lack of preference for the new object is seen in PCD mice at P30. (E) Quantification of the number of visits to both objects at P30; no differences were observed. n = 8–9 per experimental group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 6Analysis of the social preference test during postnatal development. (A) Diagram of test performance. (B–E) Charts showing quantification of the percentage of time spent exploring the chambers containing either the intruder animal or an object for both WT and PCD mice at different ages (mean ± SEM). Note that PCD mice, contrary to the WT, spent the same amount of time exploring both chambers. n = 8–9 per experimental group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 7Schematic representation in scale of the targeting vector used and all the possible alleles for CCP1 gene. Orange bar: genomic DNA. Black boxes: exons with their corresponding number. Green and purple arrowheads: LoxP and Flp sequences, respectively. White bar: neo cassette, with the neomycin resistance gene (white box). Blue lines: zone of sequence homology for homologous recombination, with the corresponding size in kbp. Black arrowheads: primers used for the PCR genotyping.