Literature DB >> 20350172

Changes in cerebello-motor connectivity during procedural learning by actual execution and observation.

Sara Torriero1, Massimiliano Oliveri, Giacomo Koch, Emanuele Lo Gerfo, Silvia Salerno, Fabio Ferlazzo, Carlo Caltagirone, Laura Petrosini.   

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved in motor learning of new procedures both during actual execution of a motor task and during observational training. These processes are thought to depend on the activity of a neural network that involves the lateral cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). In this study, we used a twin-coil TMS technique to investigate whether execution and observation of a visuomotor procedural learning task is related to modulation of cerebello-motor connectivity. We observed that, at rest, a magnetic conditioning pulse applied over the lateral cerebellum reduced the motor-evoked potentials obtained by stimulating the contralateral M1, indicating activation of a cerebello-motor connection. Furthermore, during procedural learning, cerebellar stimulation resulted in selective facilitation, not inhibition, of contralateral M1 excitability. The effects were evident when motor learning was obtained by actual execution of the task or by observation, but they disappeared if procedural learning had already been acquired by previous observational training. These results indicate that changes in cerebello-motor connectivity occur in relation to specific phases of procedural learning, demonstrating a complex pattern of excitatory and inhibitory drives modulated across time.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20350172     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  24 in total

1.  Effects of cerebellar stimulation on processing semantic associations.

Authors:  Giorgos P Argyropoulos; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Impaired sequence learning in dystonia mutation carriers: a genotypic effect.

Authors:  Maren Carbon; Miklos Argyelan; Maria Felice Ghilardi; Paul Mattis; Vijay Dhawan; Susan Bressman; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Cerebellar-M1 Connectivity Changes Associated with Motor Learning Are Somatotopic Specific.

Authors:  Danny A Spampinato; Hannah J Block; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Linking novelty seeking and harm avoidance personality traits to cerebellar volumes.

Authors:  Daniela Laricchiuta; Laura Petrosini; Fabrizio Piras; Enrica Macci; Debora Cutuli; Chiara Chiapponi; Antonio Cerasa; Eleonora Picerni; Carlo Caltagirone; Paolo Girardi; Stefano Maria Tamorri; Gianfranco Spalletta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Modulation of cerebellar brain inhibition during temporal adaptive learning in a coincident timing task.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Tanaka; Masato Hirano; Kozo Funase
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  A hypothetical universal model of cerebellar function: reconsideration of the current dogma.

Authors:  Ari Magal
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.