Literature DB >> 29447778

The effect of high-dose atorvastatin on neural activity and cognitive function.

Beth A Taylor1, Alecia D Dager2, Gregory A Panza3, Amanda L Zaleski3, Shashwath Meda4, Gregory Book4, Michael C Stevens2, Sarah Tartar5, C Michael White6, Donna M Polk7, Godfrey D Pearlson2, Paul D Thompson8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has not been used to assess the effects of statins on the brain. We assessed the effect of statins on cognition using standard neuropsychological assessments and brain neural activation with fMRI on two tasks.
METHODS: Healthy statin-naïve men and women (48±15 years) were randomized to 80 mg/day atorvastatin (n=66; 27 men) or placebo (n=84; 48 men) for 6 months. Participants completed cognitive testing while on study drug and 2 months after treatment cessation using alternative test and task versions.
RESULTS: There were few changes in standard neuropsychological tests with drug treatment (all P>.56). Total and delayed recall from the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised increased in both groups (P<.05). The Stroop Color-Word score increased (P<.01) and the 18-Point Clock Test decreased in the placebo group (P=.02) after drug cessation. There were, however, small but significant group-time interactions for each fMRI task: participants on placebo had greater activation in the right putamen/dorsal striatum during the maintenance phase of the Sternberg task while on placebo but the effect was reversed after drug washout (P<.001). Participants on atorvastatin had greater activation in the bilateral precuneus during the encoding phase of the Figural Memory task while on-drug but the effect was reversed after drug washout (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Six months of high dose atorvastatin therapy is not associated with measurable changes in neuropsychological test scores, but did evoke transient differences in brain activation patterns. Larger, longer-term clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate their clinical implications.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29447778      PMCID: PMC6083849          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  38 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Randomized trial of the effects of simvastatin on cognitive functioning in hypercholesterolemic adults.

Authors:  Matthew F Muldoon; Christopher M Ryan; Susan M Sereika; Janine D Flory; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  A randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of statins on skeletal muscle function and performance: rationale and study design.

Authors:  Paul D Thompson; Beth A Parker; Priscilla M Clarkson; Linda S Pescatello; C Michael White; Adam S Grimaldi; Benjamin D Levine; Ronald G Haller; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  Prev Cardiol       Date:  2010

4.  Simvastatin-associated memory loss.

Authors:  A Orsi; O Sherman; Z Woldeselassie
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 5.  The Stroop color-word test: a review.

Authors:  A R Jensen; W D Rohwer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1966

Review 6.  Do statins impair cognition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Brian R Ott; Lori A Daiello; Issa J Dahabreh; Beth A Springate; Kimberly Bixby; Manjari Murali; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Figural memory performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging activity across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Sharna Jamadar; Michal Assaf; Kanchana Jagannathan; Karen Anderson; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Examining the range of normal intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance.

Authors:  David J Schretlen; Cynthia A Munro; James C Anthony; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Patients With Muscle-Related Statin Intolerance: The GAUSS-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen; Erik Stroes; Ricardo E Dent-Acosta; Robert S Rosenson; Sam J Lehman; Naveed Sattar; David Preiss; Eric Bruckert; Richard Ceška; Norman Lepor; Christie M Ballantyne; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Mary Elliott; Danielle M Brennan; Scott M Wasserman; Ransi Somaratne; Rob Scott; Evan A Stein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pravastatin and cognitive function in the elderly. Results of the PROSPER study.

Authors:  Stella Trompet; Peter van Vliet; Anton J M de Craen; Jelle Jolles; Brendan M Buckley; Michael B Murphy; Ian Ford; Peter W Macfarlane; Naveed Sattar; Chris J Packard; David J Stott; Jim Shepherd; Eduard L E M Bollen; Gerard J Blauw; J Wouter Jukema; Rudi G J Westendorp
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  3 in total

1.  The preventive effects of different doses of atorvastatin on contrast-induced acute kidney injury after CT perfusion.

Authors:  Shi-Xin Yan; Man Gao; Tian-Hao Yang; Chao Tian; Song Jin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.124

2.  Identification of an individual with a SYGNAP1 pathogenic mutation in India.

Authors:  Vijaya Verma; Amit Mandora; Abhijeet Botre; James P Clement
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Implications of Ezetimibe in Combination with Low- to Moderate-Intensity Atorvastatin Adjuvant Aspirin Therapy for Cerebrovascular Disease.

Authors:  Lijie Wang; Xiaoqin Tang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.