PURPOSE: In our initial study of the potential effects of cholesterol-lowering interventions on cognitive functioning, treatment with lovastatin as compared with placebo caused performance decrements on several neuropsychological tests, whereas scores on other tests were unaffected. The current study was designed to confirm and extend those findings. METHODS: The study comprised 308 hypercholesterolemic adults between 35 and 70 years of age. Employing a randomized double-blind design, we assigned participants to daily treatment with placebo, 10 mg of simvastatin, or 40 mg of simvastatin for 6 months. A neuropsychological test battery was administered to assess cognitive functioning at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 283 subjects completed the study: 94 subjects onplacebo, 96 taking 10 mg of simvastatin, and 93 taking 40 mg of simvastatin. Compared with placebo, decremental effects of simvastatin treatment were found on tests previously observed to be sensitive to statins (P = 0.008; difference in summary z scores = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.29) and on tests not previously administered (P = 0.04; difference in summary z scores = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.29), but not on tests previously observed to be insensitive to statins (P = 0.84; difference in summary z scores = 0.02; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.10). For the three tests specifically affected by simvastatin, effects on cognitive performance were small, manifest only as failure to improve during the 6 months of treatment (compared with placebo), and were confounded by baseline differences on one test. CONCLUSION: This study provides partial support for minor decrements in cognitive functioning with statins. Whether such effects have any long-term sequelae or occur with other cholesterol-lowering interventions is not known.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: In our initial study of the potential effects of cholesterol-lowering interventions on cognitive functioning, treatment with lovastatin as compared with placebo caused performance decrements on several neuropsychological tests, whereas scores on other tests were unaffected. The current study was designed to confirm and extend those findings. METHODS: The study comprised 308 hypercholesterolemic adults between 35 and 70 years of age. Employing a randomized double-blind design, we assigned participants to daily treatment with placebo, 10 mg of simvastatin, or 40 mg of simvastatin for 6 months. A neuropsychological test battery was administered to assess cognitive functioning at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. RESULTS: A total of 283 subjects completed the study: 94 subjects on placebo, 96 taking 10 mg of simvastatin, and 93 taking 40 mg of simvastatin. Compared with placebo, decremental effects of simvastatin treatment were found on tests previously observed to be sensitive to statins (P = 0.008; difference in summary z scores = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.29) and on tests not previously administered (P = 0.04; difference in summary z scores = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.29), but not on tests previously observed to be insensitive to statins (P = 0.84; difference in summary z scores = 0.02; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.10). For the three tests specifically affected by simvastatin, effects on cognitive performance were small, manifest only as failure to improve during the 6 months of treatment (compared with placebo), and were confounded by baseline differences on one test. CONCLUSION: This study provides partial support for minor decrements in cognitive functioning with statins. Whether such effects have any long-term sequelae or occur with other cholesterol-lowering interventions is not known.
Authors: Jan M Schilling; Weihua Cui; Joseph C Godoy; Victoria B Risbrough; Ingrid R Niesman; David M Roth; Piyush M Patel; John C Drummond; Hemal H Patel; Alice E Zemljic-Harpf; Brian P Head Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Marcello Tonelli; Anita Lloyd; Fiona Clement; Jon Conly; Don Husereau; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Scott Klarenbach; Finlay A McAlister; Natasha Wiebe; Braden Manns Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Benjamin L Deck; Jacqueline Rick; Sharon X Xie; Alice Chen-Plotkin; John E Duda; James F Morley; Lana M Chahine; Nabila Dahodwala; John Q Trojanowski; Daniel Weintraub Journal: J Parkinsons Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Sonal Singh; Susan Zieman; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann; Nanette K Wenger; Jerome L Fleg; Barbara Radziszewska; Neil J Stone; Sophia Zoungas; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.562