BACKGROUND: In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning regarding potential adverse effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) on cognition, based on the Adverse Events Reporting System and a review of the medical literature. We aimed to synthesize randomized clinical trial (RCTs) evidence on the association between statin therapy and cognitive outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL through December 2012, and reviewed published systematic reviews of statin treatment. We sought RCTs that compared statin treatment versus placebo or standard care, and reported at least one cognitive outcome (frequency of adverse cognitive events or measurements using standard neuropsychological cognitive test scores). Studies reporting sufficient information to calculate effect sizes were included in meta-analyses. Standardized and unstandardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes for global cognition and for pre-specified cognitive domains. The main outcome was change in cognition measured by neuropsychological tests; an outcome of secondary interest was the frequency of adverse cognitive events observed during follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 25 RCTs (all placebo-controlled) reporting cognitive outcomes in 46,836 subjects, of which 23 RCTs reported cognitive test results in 29,012 participants. Adverse cognitive outcomes attributable to statins were rarely reported in trials involving cognitively normal or impaired subjects. Furthermore, meta-analysis of cognitive test data (14 studies; 27,643 participants) failed to show significant adverse effects of statins on all tests of cognition in either cognitively normal subjects (standardized mean difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval, CI, -0.01 to 0.03, p = 0.42) or Alzheimer's disease subjects (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10, p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy was not associated with cognitive impairment in RCTs. These results raise questions regarding the continued merit of the FDA warning about potential adverse effects of statins on cognition.
BACKGROUND: In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning regarding potential adverse effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) on cognition, based on the Adverse Events Reporting System and a review of the medical literature. We aimed to synthesize randomized clinical trial (RCTs) evidence on the association between statin therapy and cognitive outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL through December 2012, and reviewed published systematic reviews of statin treatment. We sought RCTs that compared statin treatment versus placebo or standard care, and reported at least one cognitive outcome (frequency of adverse cognitive events or measurements using standard neuropsychological cognitive test scores). Studies reporting sufficient information to calculate effect sizes were included in meta-analyses. Standardized and unstandardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes for global cognition and for pre-specified cognitive domains. The main outcome was change in cognition measured by neuropsychological tests; an outcome of secondary interest was the frequency of adverse cognitive events observed during follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 25 RCTs (all placebo-controlled) reporting cognitive outcomes in 46,836 subjects, of which 23 RCTs reported cognitive test results in 29,012 participants. Adverse cognitive outcomes attributable to statins were rarely reported in trials involving cognitively normal or impaired subjects. Furthermore, meta-analysis of cognitive test data (14 studies; 27,643 participants) failed to show significant adverse effects of statins on all tests of cognition in either cognitively normal subjects (standardized mean difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval, CI, -0.01 to 0.03, p = 0.42) or Alzheimer's disease subjects (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10, p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy was not associated with cognitive impairment in RCTs. These results raise questions regarding the continued merit of the FDA warning about potential adverse effects of statins on cognition.
Authors: Matthew F Muldoon; Christopher M Ryan; Susan M Sereika; Janine D Flory; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Bernadette McGuinness; John O'Hare; David Craig; Roger Bullock; Reem Malouf; Peter Passmore Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-08-04
Authors: Peter P Zandi; D Larry Sparks; Ara S Khachaturian; Joann Tschanz; Maria Norton; Martin Steinberg; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; John C S Breitner Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-02
Authors: Cynthia M Carlsson; Carey E Gleason; Timothy M Hess; Kimberly A Moreland; Hanna M Blazel; Rebecca L Koscik; Nathan T N Schreiber; Sterling C Johnson; Craig S Atwood; Luigi Puglielli; Bruce P Hermann; Patrick E McBride; James H Stein; Mark A Sager; Sanjay Asthana Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Stella Trompet; Peter van Vliet; Anton J M de Craen; Jelle Jolles; Brendan M Buckley; Michael B Murphy; Ian Ford; Peter W Macfarlane; Naveed Sattar; Chris J Packard; David J Stott; Jim Shepherd; Eduard L E M Bollen; Gerard J Blauw; J Wouter Jukema; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: J Neurol Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Sonal Singh; Susan Zieman; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann; Nanette K Wenger; Jerome L Fleg; Barbara Radziszewska; Neil J Stone; Sophia Zoungas; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Vijay K Ramanan; Scott A Przybelski; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Anna M Castillo; Val J Lowe; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Robert I Reid; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472