Literature DB >> 29446757

3D bioprinting mesenchymal stem cell-laden construct with core-shell nanospheres for cartilage tissue engineering.

Wei Zhu1, Haitao Cui, Benchaa Boualam, Fahed Masood, Erin Flynn, Raj D Rao, Zhi-Yong Zhang, Lijie Grace Zhang.   

Abstract

Cartilage tissue is prone to degradation and has little capacity for self-healing due to its avascularity. Tissue engineering, which provides artificial scaffolds to repair injured tissues, is a novel and promising strategy for cartilage repair. 3D bioprinting offers even greater potential for repairing degenerative tissue by simultaneously integrating living cells, biomaterials, and biological cues to provide a customized scaffold. With regard to cell selection, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great capacity for differentiating into a variety of cell types, including chondrocytes, and could therefore be utilized as a cartilage cell source in 3D bioprinting. In the present study, we utilize a tabletop stereolithography-based 3D bioprinter for a novel cell-laden cartilage tissue construct fabrication. Printable resin is composed of 10% gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) base, various concentrations of polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA), biocompatible photoinitiator, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) embedded nanospheres fabricated via a core-shell electrospraying technique. We find that the addition of PEGDA into GelMA hydrogel greatly improves the printing resolution. Compressive testing shows that modulus of the bioprinted scaffolds proportionally increases with the concentrations of PEGDA, while swelling ratio decreases with the increase of PEGDA concentration. Confocal microscopy images illustrate that the cells and nanospheres are evenly distributed throughout the entire bioprinted construct. Cells grown on 5%/10% (PEGDA/GelMA) hydrogel present the highest cell viability and proliferation rate. The TGF-β1 embedded in nanospheres can keep a sustained release up to 21 d and improve chondrogenic differentiation of encapsulated MSCs. The cell-laden bioprinted cartilage constructs with TGF-β1-containing nanospheres is a promising strategy for cartilage regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29446757     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotechnology        ISSN: 0957-4484            Impact factor:   3.874


  27 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Progress in three-dimensional printing with growth factors.

Authors:  Gerry L Koons; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Engineering a Novel 3D Printed Vascularized Tissue Model for Investigating Breast Cancer Metastasis to Bone.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Timothy Esworthy; Xuan Zhou; Sung Yun Hann; Robert I Glazer; Rong Li; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 4.  3D bioprinting for cardiovascular regeneration and pharmacology.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Shida Miao; Timothy Esworthy; Xuan Zhou; Se-Jun Lee; Chengyu Liu; Zu-Xi Yu; John P Fisher; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 5.  Advances in the Application of Three-dimensional Printing for the Clinical Treatment of Osteoarticular Defects.

Authors:  Xiao-Ze Fan; Ming-Ze Du; Chen Jiao; Qin-Wei Guo; Dong Jiang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-22

6.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Patrick Kennedy; Nicholas Bonazza; Yin Yu; Aman Dhawan; Ibrahim Ozbolat
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

8.  3D bioprinting of oligo(poly[ethylene glycol] fumarate) for bone and nerve tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; Bipin Gaihre; Matthew N George; A Lee Miller; Haocheng Xu; Brian E Waletzki; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Bioprinting of dual ECM scaffolds encapsulating limbal stem/progenitor cells in active and quiescent statuses.

Authors:  Zheng Zhong; Alis Balayan; Jing Tian; Yi Xiang; Henry H Hwang; Xiaokang Wu; Xiaoqian Deng; Jacob Schimelman; Yazhi Sun; Chao Ma; Aurelie Dos Santos; Shangting You; Min Tang; Emmie Yao; Xiaoao Shi; Nicole F Steinmetz; Sophie X Deng; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 9.954

10.  Effect of Pore Size on Cell Behavior Using Melt Electrowritten Scaffolds.

Authors:  Yu Han; Meifei Lian; Qiang Wu; Zhiguang Qiao; Binbin Sun; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.