Literature DB >> 29445843

Realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity : Prevalence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis.

B G Diebo1, N V Shah2, S G Stroud2, C B Paulino2, F J Schwab3, V Lafage3.   

Abstract

Although surgical techniques pertaining to adult spinal deformity (ASD) have advanced over the last decade, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is still a complication following surgery for ASD that continues to significantly challenge clinicians. This article aimed to report on the prevalence of PJK as well as enhance understanding of surgically modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors of PJK to guide management of this postoperative complication of ASD. As the understanding of the pathogenesis as well as surgical modifications aimed at reducing the incidence of PJK have advanced, so too should clinicians' ability to implement more patient-specific operative plans and improve outcomes following realignment surgery for ASD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Outcomes; Patient-specific factors; Risk stratification; Surgically-modifiable factors

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29445843     DOI： 10.1007/s00132-018-3536-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN： 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  60 in total

1.  The intrinsic shape of the human lumbar spine in the supine, standing and sitting postures: characterization using an active shape model.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jennifer S Gregory; Richard M Aspden; Francis W Smith; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Virtual Modeling of Postoperative Alignment After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Helps Predict Associations Between Compensatory Spinopelvic Alignment Changes, Overcorrection, and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Shay Bess; Steve Glassman; Christopher Ames; Douglas Burton; Robert Hart; Han J Kim; Eric Klineberg; Jensen Henry; Breton Line; Justin Scheer; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Moon Soo Park; Kwang Sup Song; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Tapanut Chuntarapas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables.

Authors:  Marco Cammarata; Carl-Éric Aubin; Xiaoyu Wang; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Mitsuru Yagi; Joseph Nyugen; Matthew E Cunningham; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Development of Validated Computer-based Preoperative Predictive Model for Proximal Junction Failure (PJF) or Clinically Significant PJK With 86% Accuracy Based on 510 ASD Patients With 2-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Joseph A Osorio; Justin S Smith; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Breton Line; Bassel G Diebo; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Amit Jain; Tamir Ailon; Douglas C Burton; Christopher I Shaffrey; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Adult spine deformity.

Authors:  Christopher R Good; Joshua D Auerbach; Patrick T O'Leary; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

8.  Predicting outcome and complications in the surgical treatment of adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen Glassman; Michael R Shainline
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis after stopping at thoracolumbar junction have lower muscularity, fatty degeneration at the thoracolumbar area.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  The effect of age on sagittal plane profile of the lumbar spine according to standing, supine, and various sitting positions.

Authors:  Eui Seok Lee; Cheol Woong Ko; Seung Woo Suh; Suresh Kumar; Il Kuy Kang; Jae Hyuk Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.359
View more
  4 in total

1.  [Peak timing for complications after spine surgery].

Authors:  W Pepke; C Wantia; H Almansour; T Bruckner; M Thielen; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Correlation between lordosis distribution index, lordosis tilt, and occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li; Xiangyu Hou; Shuai Jiang; Siyu Zhou; Da Zou; Zhuofu Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Compensatory mechanisms recruited against proximal junctional kyphosis by patients instrumented from the thoracolumbar junction to the iliac.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Fernando Escámez; Caglar Yilgor; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo; José Miguel Sánchez-Márquez; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Ahmet Alanay; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Timon F G Vercoulen; Remco J P Doodkorte; Alex Roth; Rob de Bie; Paul C Willems
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-07-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.