| Literature DB >> 29445654 |
Fatemeh Gholami1, Malihe Khoramdad1, Ebrahim Shakiba2, Yousef Alimohamadi3,4, Jabbar Shafiei5, Alireza Firouzi6.
Abstract
Background: There is no global consensus about the relationship between dairy consumption and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This study aimed at integrating the results of several studies to predict the dairy effects on CVD, e.g. stroke and CHD.Entities:
Keywords: CHD; Cardiovascular Disease; Dairy Products; Meta-analysis; Stroke
Year: 2017 PMID: 29445654 PMCID: PMC5804434 DOI: 10.18869/mjiri.31.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med J Islam Repub Iran ISSN: 1016-1430
Fig. 1
Fig. 2Characteristics of the cohort studies by subgroup dairy products consumption and CHD or stroke
| Author | Study, Country |
Age | Participants | Sex | Quality | Follow-up (Years) |
Outcome |
|
Praagman et al., 2014 ( | The Rotterdam Study, Netherlands | ≥ 55 | 4235 | Both | High | 17.3 |
Incidence |
|
Dalmeijer et al., 2013 ( | EPIC-NL Study, Netherlands | 49-70 | 33625 | Both | High | 13.1 |
Incidence |
| Larsson et al., 2012 (27) | The Swedish Mammography Cohort and the Cohort of Swedish Men | 45-83 | 74961 | Both | High | 10.2 |
Incidence |
|
Sonsestedt et al., 2011 ( | Malmo Diet and Cancer Cohort, Sweden | 44-74 | 26445 | Both | High | 12 |
Incidence |
|
Goldbohm et al., 2011 ( | Netherlands Cohort Study, Netherlands | 55-69 | 58279 | Male | High | 10 |
Mortality |
|
van der Pols et al., 2009 ( | The Body Orr Cohort, England and Scotland | 8 | 4374 | Both | High | 65 |
Mortality |
|
Larsson et al., 2009 ( | The ATBC Study, Finland | 50-69 | 26556 | Male | Moderate | 13.6 |
Incidence |
|
Elwood et al., 2004 ( | The Caerphilly Cohort Study, UK | 45-59 | 2403 | Male | Moderate | 20-24 |
Incidence |
|
Sauvaget et al., 2003 ( | Life Span Study(LSS), Japanese | 56 | 37130 | Both | High | 16 |
Mortality |
|
Ness et al., 2001 ( | The Collaborative Study, Scotland | 35-64 | 5765 | Male | Low | 25 |
Mortality |
|
Kinjo et al., 1999 ( | Japanese | 40-69 |
223170 | Both | Low | 15 |
Mortality |
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5