| Literature DB >> 29445367 |
Yong-Wei Yan1, Qiu-Yue Jiang1, Jian-Gong Wang1, Ting Zhu1, Bin Zou1, Qiong-Fen Qiu2, Zhe-Xue Quan1.
Abstract
Intertidal mudflats are land-sea interaction areas and play important roles in global nutrient cycles. However, a comprehensive understanding of microbial communities in these mudflats remains elusive. In this study, mudflat sediment samples from the Dongtan wetland of Chongming Island, the largest alluvial island in the world, were collected. Using a modified metatranscriptomic method, the depth-wise distributions of potentially active microbial communities were investigated based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) sequences. Multiple environmental factors were also measured and analyzed in conjunction with the prokaryotic composition profiles. A prokaryotic diversity analysis based on the metatranscriptome datasets revealed two or threefold higher diversity indices (associated with potentially active microbes participating in biogeochemical processes in Dongtan) compared with the diversity indices based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Bacteria were numerically dominant relative to archaea, and the potentially active prokaryotic taxa were mostly assigned to the bacterial phyla Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes and the classes Delta- and Gamma-proteobacteria, along with the archaeal lineages phylum Bathyarchaeota and the order Thermoplasmatales. The totalEntities:
Keywords: SSU rRNA; bias; community composition; intertidal mudflat; metatranscriptome
Year: 2018 PMID: 29445367 PMCID: PMC5797801 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Physicochemical soil parameters for the different depths of mudflat sediments (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Samples | Temp (°C) | pH | Moisture (%) | EC (mS) | ORP (mV) | TN (%) | TC (%) | Sulfate (mg kg-1 DWS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-1a | 28.4 ± 0.4 | 6.90 ± 0.15 | 25.0 ± 0.4 | 5.13 ± 0.03 | –132.5 ± 17.7 | 0.072 ± 0.006 | 1.414 ± 0.020 | 929.3 ± 87.9 |
| S1-2 | 27.4 ± 1.4 | 6.80 ± 0.09 | 23.4 ± 0.3 | 4.48 ± 0.63 | –160.3 ± 5.7 | 0.071 ± 0.002 | 1.332 ± 0.022 | 1087.2 ± 171.1 |
| S1-3 | 26.2 ± 0.2 | 7.09 ± 0.2 | 22.4 ± 0.4 | 4.26 ± 0.42 | –62.3 ± 29.7 | 0.052 ± 0.008 | 1.340 ± 0.044 | 620.1 ± 61.3 |
| S1-4 | 26.2 ± 0.7 | 6.84 ± 0.23 | 24.0 ± 1.2 | 6.55 ± 0.19 | –114.7 ± 25.0 | 0.057 ± 0.008 | 1.260 ± 0.089 | 863.1 ± 189.3 |
| S2-1 | 28.5 ± 0.6 | 6.94 ± 0.20 | 28.3 ± 2.3 | 5.46 ± 0.30 | –111.7 ± 8.5 | 0.087 ± 0.011 | 1.331 ± 0.096 | 899.5 ± 176.8 |
| S2-2 | 25.3 ± 2.1 | 6.59 ± 0.07 | 28.7 ± 0.4 | 4.33 ± 1.05 | –159.7 ± 12.7 | 0.085 ± 0.003 | 1.342 ± 0.072 | 1145 ± 130.9 |
| S2-3 | 26.1 ± 0.7 | 7.24 ± 0.14 | 28.2 ± 1.1 | 5.07 ± 0.09 | –153.7 ± 5.5 | 0.071 ± 0.006 | 1.482 ± 0.037 | 772.0 ± 86.0 |
| S2-4 | 28.3 ± 0.9 | 6.71 ± 0.23 | 31.2 ± 1.3 | 6.23 ± 0.88 | –169.7 ± 30.0 | 0.057 ± 0.049 | 1.133 ± 0.984 | 1327.4 ± 240.4 |
| S3-1 | 26.3 ± 0.3 | 7.34 ± 0.09 | 24.6 ± 0.3 | 4.21 ± 0.13 | –99.5 ± 10.6 | 0.079 ± 0.008 | 1.424 ± 0.046 | 867.2 ± 15.5 |
| S3-2 | 27.8 ± 0.7 | 7.52 ± 0.15 | 22.5 ± 0.3 | 4.52 ± 1.07 | –138.7 ± 11.0 | 0.077 ± 0.007 | 1.364 ± 0.096 | 633.6 ± 16.7 |
| S3-3 | 27.2 ± 0.1 | 7.38 ± 0.11 | 23.4 ± 0.3 | 5.13 ± 0.07 | –125.7 ± 28.6 | 0.068 ± 0.003 | 1.302 ± 0.048 | 742.4 ± 97.9 |
| S3-4 | 28.6 ± 0.7 | 7.56 ± 0.22 | 21.7 ± 0.1 | 4.34 ± 0.27 | –99.3 ± 17.6 | 0.063 ± 0.006 | 1.352 ± 0.079 | 740.2 ± 145.5 |
Three types of abundance underestimation based on comparisons among datasets across the four-depth sediments in location S2 for bacterial taxa with higher abundances in MT-16S than 16S rDNA amplicons.
| cDNA (%)a | rDNA (%)b | MT-16S (%)c | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | mean ± SD | |
| Phylum | |||
| | 5.36 ± 0.78AB | 1.61 ± 1.06C | 4.45 ± 0.56A |
| Order | |||
| | 7.54 ± 1.53AB | 3.24 ± 1.95C | 9.33 ± 0.81A |
| | 1.07 ± 0.10AB | 0.28 ± 0.14C | 1.17 ± 0.12A |
| Phylum | |||
| | 0.00 ± 0.00B | 0.00 ± 0.00BC | 1.28 ± 0.67A |
| | 0.00 ± 0.00B | 0.00 ± 0.00BC | 0.30 ± 0.08A |
| | 0.00 ± 0.00B | 0.00 ± 0.00BC | 3.37 ± 0.59A |
| | 0.02 ± 0.02B | 0.01 ± 0.00BC | 3.15 ± 0.18A |
| Phylum | |||
| | 11.77 ± 7.29B | 5.33 ± 4.62C | 20.94 ± 5.89A |
| Class | |||
| Subgroup 22 (Acidobacteria) | 0.82 ± 0.14B | 0.21 ± 0.09C | 1.63 ± 0.33A |
| Family | |||
| | 7.95 ± 5.93B | 1.78 ± 1.25C | 13.87 ± 4.57A |
| | 0.15 ± 0.03B | 0.03 ± 0.02C | 0.39 ± 0.11A |
Significant Pearson’s correlation coefficients between microbial taxa and environmental parameters (P < 0.05).
| Phylum or class | Tempa | pH | Moisture | EC | ORP | TN | TC | Sulfate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| –0.74 | ||||||||
| 0.61 | ||||||||
| –0.70 | ||||||||
| –0.79 | ||||||||
| –0.64 | ||||||||
| 0.75 | 0.60 | |||||||
| 0.68 | ||||||||
| Candidate_division_WS3 | –0.71 | |||||||
| –0.83 | –0.69 | |||||||
| –0.79 | –0.62 | |||||||
| 0.79 | ||||||||
| –0.60 | ||||||||
| 0.73 | ||||||||
| –0.65 | ||||||||
| –0.61 | ||||||||
| –0.69 | 0.84 | |||||||
| –0.74 | ||||||||
| –0.61 | ||||||||
| –0.75 | ||||||||
| –0.77 | ||||||||
| 0.62 | ||||||||
| 0.62 | ||||||||
| Candidate_division_OP8 | –0.68 | |||||||
| Candidate_division_WS3 | 0.61 | –0.74 | 0.66 | |||||
| –0.58 | –0.79 | |||||||
| 0.61 | –0.74 | 0.66 | ||||||
| –0.59 | ||||||||
| 0.63 | ||||||||
| –0.67 | –0.63 | |||||||
| –0.60 | ||||||||
| 0.61 | –0.74 | 0.66 | ||||||
| TA06 | 0.61 | –0.74 | 0.66 |