Literature DB >> 23306392

Methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) gene-based investigation of methanogens in the mudflat sediments of Yangtze River estuary, China.

Jemaneh Zeleke1, Shui-Long Lu, Jian-Gong Wang, Jing-Xin Huang, Bo Li, Andrew V Ogram, Zhe-Xue Quan.   

Abstract

Methanogen populations of an intertidal mudflat in the Yangtze River estuary of China were investigated based on the methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) gene using 454-pyrosequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Samples were collected at six depths from three locations. In the qPCR analyses, a mean depth-wise change of mcrA gene abundance was observed from (1.23 ± 0.13) × 10(7) to (1.16 ± 0.29) × 10(8) per g dried soil, which was inversely correlated with the depletion of sulfate (R(2) = 0.74; α = 0.05) and salinity (R (2) = 0.66; α = 0.05). The copy numbers of mcrA was at least 1 order of magnitude higher than dissimilatory sulfate reductase B (dsrB) genes, likely indicating the importance of methanogenesis at the mudflat. Sequences related to the orders Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales and the uncultured methanogens; Rice Cluster I (RC-I), Zoige cluster I (ZC-I) and anaerobic methane oxidizing archaeal lineage-1 (ANME-1) were detected. Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinales dominated the entire sediment layers, but detectable changes of proportions were observed with depth. The hydrogenotrophic methanogens Methanomicrobiales slightly increased with depth while Methanosarcinales showed the reverse. Chao1 and ACE richness estimators revealed higher diversity of methanogens near the surface (0-10 cm) when compared with the bottom sediments. The near-surface sediments were mainly dominated by the family Methanosarcinaceae (45 %), which has members that can utilize substrates that cannot be used by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Overall, current data indicate that Methanosarcinales and Methanomicrobiales are the most dominant methanogens within the entire depth profile down to 100 cm, with higher abundance and diversity of methanogens in the deeper and upper sediment layers, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23306392     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-012-0155-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  33 in total

1.  The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill.

Authors:  Philip E Luton; Jonathan M Wayne; Richard J Sharp; Paul W Riley
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Contrasting patterns of niche partitioning between two anaerobic terminal oxidizers of organic matter.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Franck Carbonero; Scot E Dowd; Robert J Hawkins; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Methyl-coenzyme M reductase genes: unique functional markers for methanogenic and anaerobic methane-oxidizing Archaea.

Authors:  Michael W Friedrich
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  DsrB gene-based DGGE for community and diversity surveys of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Joke Geets; Brigitte Borremans; Ludo Diels; Dirk Springael; Jaco Vangronsveld; Daniel van der Lelie; Karolien Vanbroekhoven
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; S Polcin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Stratification of Archaeal communities in shallow sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, Southern China.

Authors:  Lijing Jiang; Yanping Zheng; Jinquan Chen; Xiang Xiao; Fengping Wang
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Potential of pmoA amplicon pyrosequencing for methanotroph diversity studies.

Authors:  Claudia Lüke; Peter Frenzel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Methanogen community in Zoige wetland of Tibetan plateau and phenotypic characterization of a dominant uncultured methanogen cluster ZC-I.

Authors:  Guishan Zhang; Jianqing Tian; Na Jiang; Xiaopeng Guo; Yanfen Wang; Xiuzhu Dong
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Diversity and abundance of sulfate-reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea.

Authors:  Julie Leloup; Alexander Loy; Nina J Knab; Christian Borowski; Michael Wagner; Bo Barker Jørgensen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.491

View more
  14 in total

1.  Pyrosequencing of mcrA and archaeal 16S rRNA genes reveals diversity and substrate preferences of methanogen communities in anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  David Wilkins; Xiao-Ying Lu; Zhiyong Shen; Jiapeng Chen; Patrick K H Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of Planted Versus Naturally Growing Vallisneria natans on the Sediment Microbial Community in West Lake, China.

Authors:  Chuan Wang; Shuangyuan Liu; Yi Zhang; Biyun Liu; Lei Zeng; Feng He; Qiaohong Zhou; Zhenbin Wu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Cold Seeps on the Passive Northern U.S. Atlantic Margin Host Globally Representative Members of the Seep Microbiome with Locally Dominant Strains of Archaea.

Authors:  Amanda C Semler; Julian L Fortney; Robinson W Fulweiler; Anne E Dekas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  Impact of River Channel Lateral Migration on Microbial Communities across a Discontinuous Permafrost Floodplain.

Authors:  Madison M Douglas; Usha F Lingappa; Michael P Lamb; Joel C Rowland; A Joshua West; Gen Li; Preston C Kemeny; Austin J Chadwick; Anastasia Piliouras; Jon Schwenk; Woodward W Fischer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Metagenomic evidence for reciprocal particle exchange between the mainstem estuary and lateral bay sediments of the lower Columbia River.

Authors:  Maria W Smith; Richard E Davis; Nicholas D Youngblut; Tuomas Kärnä; Lydie Herfort; Rachel J Whitaker; William W Metcalf; Bradley M Tebo; António M Baptista; Holly M Simon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2-bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid.

Authors:  Tara M Webster; Adam L Smith; Raghav R Reddy; Ameet J Pinto; Kim F Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Responses of soil nitrogen fixation to Spartina alterniflora invasion and nitrogen addition in a Chinese salt marsh.

Authors:  Jingxin Huang; Xiao Xu; Min Wang; Ming Nie; Shiyun Qiu; Qing Wang; Zhexue Quan; Ming Xiao; Bo Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Methane production potentials, pathways, and communities of methanogens in vertical sediment profiles of river Sitka.

Authors:  Václav Mach; Martin B Blaser; Peter Claus; Prem P Chaudhary; Martin Rulík
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effects of Spartina alterniflora invasion on the communities of methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in estuarine marsh sediments.

Authors:  Jemaneh Zeleke; Qiang Sheng; Jian-Gong Wang; Ming-Yao Huang; Fei Xia; Ji-Hua Wu; Zhe-Xue Quan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Spatial Variations of the Methanogenic Communities in the Sediments of Tropical Mangroves.

Authors:  Hongmei Jing; Shunyan Cheung; Zhi Zhou; Chen Wu; Sanjay Nagarajan; Hongbin Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.