Literature DB >> 29445028

Evaluation of Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Elderly Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Analysis.

Walid L Shaib1, Jeb S Jones2, Michael Goodman2, Juan M Sarmiento3, Shishir K Maithel3, Kenneth Cardona3, Sujata Kane4, Christina Wu4, Olatunji B Alese4, Bassel F El-Rayes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of pancreatic cancer (PC) in elderly patients is unknown; clinical trials exclude patients with comorbidities and those of extreme age. This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival outcomes in elderly PC patients using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histology codes 8140, 8500, 8010, 8560, 8490, 8000, 8260, 8255, 8261, 8263, 8020, 8050, 8141, 8144, 8210, 8211, or 8262 in Medicare Parts A and B were identified. Data regarding demographic, characteristics, treatments, and vital status between 1998 and 2009 were collected from the SEER. Determinants of treatment receipt and overall survival were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 5,975 patients met inclusion. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic whites (85%) and female (55%). Most cases presented with locoregional stage disease (74%); 41% received only chemotherapy, 30% chemotherapy and surgery, 10% surgery alone, 3% radiation, and 16% no cancer-directed therapy. Patients with more advanced cancer, older age, and those residing in areas of poverty were more likely to receive no treatment. Among patients 66-74 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.74) and surgery in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91) showed survival benefit as compared with the no treatment group. Among patients ≥75 years of age with locoregional disease, surgery alone (HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 0.87-4.8) or in combination with chemotherapy (HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 0.87-2.91) was not associated with better survival.
CONCLUSION: Treatment modality and survival differs by age and stage. Low socioeconomic status appears to be a major barrier to the receipt of PC therapy among Medicare patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Elderly patients with cancer are under-represented on clinical trials and usually have comorbid illnesses. The management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is unknown, with many retrospective experiences but low sample sizes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data to analyze treatment patterns and survival of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer on a larger population scale, this study highlights treatment patterns and their effect on survival and proposes possible obstacles to access of care in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer other than Medicare coverage. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Pancreatic cancer; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; Survival; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29445028      PMCID: PMC6067950          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  24 in total

Review 1.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region.

Authors:  Thomas A Arcury; John S Preisser; Wilbert M Gesler; James M Powers
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation with either gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 5-year analysis of the U.S. Intergroup/RTOG 9704 phase III trial.

Authors:  William F Regine; Kathryn A Winter; Ross Abrams; Howard Safran; John P Hoffman; Andre Konski; Al B Benson; John S Macdonald; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group.

Authors:  J H Klinkenbijl; J Jeekel; T Sahmoud; R van Pel; M L Couvreur; C H Veenhof; J P Arnaud; D G Gonzalez; L T de Wit; A Hennipman; J Wils
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Race, socioeconomic status, treatment, and survival time among pancreatic cancer cases in California.

Authors:  Jason A Zell; Jessica M Rhee; Argyrios Ziogas; Steven M Lipkin; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Are patients of low socioeconomic status receiving suboptimal management for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Michael C Cheung; Relin Yang; Margaret M Byrne; Carmen C Solorzano; Attila Nakeeb; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the best standard treatment? (Review).

Authors:  Mariacristina Di Marco; Roberto Di Cicilia; Marina Macchini; Elisabetta Nobili; Silvia Vecchiarelli; Giovanni Brandi; Guido Biasco
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  John P Neoptolemos; Daniel H Palmer; Paula Ghaneh; Eftychia E Psarelli; Juan W Valle; Christopher M Halloran; Olusola Faluyi; Derek A O'Reilly; David Cunningham; Jonathan Wadsley; Suzanne Darby; Tim Meyer; Roopinder Gillmore; Alan Anthoney; Pehr Lind; Bengt Glimelius; Stephen Falk; Jakob R Izbicki; Gary William Middleton; Sebastian Cummins; Paul J Ross; Harpreet Wasan; Alec McDonald; Tom Crosby; Yuk Ting Ma; Kinnari Patel; David Sherriff; Rubin Soomal; David Borg; Sharmila Sothi; Pascal Hammel; Thilo Hackert; Richard Jackson; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pancreatic resections in elderly patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists' risk score: a view from a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Gregorio Di Franco; Matteo Palmeri; Simone Guadagni; Niccolò Furbetta; Desirée Gianardi; Jessica Bronzoni; Alessandro Palma; Matteo Bianchini; Serena Musetti; Luca Bastiani; Giovanni Caprili; Giandomenico Biancofiore; Franco Mosca; Giulio Di Candio; Luca Morelli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Chemotherapy use and survival in older adults with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the combination therapy era.

Authors:  Rishi Jain; Namrata Vijayvergia; Karthik Devarajan; Bianca Lewis; Crystal S Denlinger; Steven J Cohen; Efrat Dotan
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Mortality and Survival Among Octogenarians with Localized Pancreatic Head Cancer: a National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan J Hue; Katherine Bingmer; Kavin Sugumar; Lee M Ocuin; Luke D Rothermel; Jordan M Winter; John B Ammori; Jeffrey M Hardacre
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Disparities in Access to Oncologic Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annabelle L Fonseca; Hamza Khan; Krista R Mehari; Deepa Cherla; Martin J Heslin; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  High-intensity focused ultrasound enhances the effect of bufalin by inducing apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhouyu Ning; Zhenfeng Zhu; Haiyong Wang; Chenyue Zhang; Litao Xu; Liping Zhuang; Xia Yan; Dan Wang; Peng Wang; Zhiqiang Meng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Management and Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer in French Real-World Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Valérie Jooste; Leila Bengrine-Lefevre; Sylvain Manfredi; Valérie Quipourt; Pascale Grosclaude; Olivier Facy; Côme Lepage; François Ghiringhelli; Anne-Marie Bouvier
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

Authors:  Yunes Doleh; Lincy S Lal; Cori Blauer-Petersen; Giovanni Antico; Michael Pishvaian
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.