Rishi Jain1, Namrata Vijayvergia2, Karthik Devarajan3, Bianca Lewis2, Crystal S Denlinger2, Steven J Cohen4, Efrat Dotan2. 1. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: rishi.jain@fccc.edu. 2. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. 4. Abington-Jefferson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While a number of landmark clinical trials have led to the approval of combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), older patients are underrepresented in these studies. We evaluated changes in practice patterns in the management of mPC among medical oncologists in the combination chemotherapy era (CCE). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. The cohort was divided into two groups (Pre-CCE, diagnosed with mPC between 2000 and 2009 and Post-CCE, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015). Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were conducted to determine the impact of treatment and prognostic variables on survival. RESULTS: 473 older patients with mPC were identified. Post-CCE, there were statistically significant increases in the use of chemotherapy (p < .005). While usage of gemcitabine was similar between groups, use of fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan increased Post-CCE. Use of chemotherapy conferred a modest but significant survival benefit (5 months Pre-CCE versus 6 months Post-CCE, p < .005). UVA and MVA showed significantly improved survival when older patients were treated with 2 or more chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited data available to guide clinicians on optimal usage of these treatments in older patients, medical oncology practice patterns for mPC have changed at an academic cancer center. Increases in chemotherapy use seems to confer a small survival benefit. Additional prospective data in older patients is necessary to improve our management of older patients with mPC.
BACKGROUND: While a number of landmark clinical trials have led to the approval of combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), older patients are underrepresented in these studies. We evaluated changes in practice patterns in the management of mPC among medical oncologists in the combination chemotherapy era (CCE). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary cancer center between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. The cohort was divided into two groups (Pre-CCE, diagnosed with mPC between 2000 and 2009 and Post-CCE, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015). Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were conducted to determine the impact of treatment and prognostic variables on survival. RESULTS: 473 older patients with mPC were identified. Post-CCE, there were statistically significant increases in the use of chemotherapy (p < .005). While usage of gemcitabine was similar between groups, use of fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan increased Post-CCE. Use of chemotherapy conferred a modest but significant survival benefit (5 months Pre-CCE versus 6 months Post-CCE, p < .005). UVA and MVA showed significantly improved survival when older patients were treated with 2 or more chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited data available to guide clinicians on optimal usage of these treatments in older patients, medical oncology practice patterns for mPC have changed at an academic cancer center. Increases in chemotherapy use seems to confer a small survival benefit. Additional prospective data in older patients is necessary to improve our management of older patients with mPC.
Authors: Andrea Wang-Gillam; Chung-Pin Li; György Bodoky; Andrew Dean; Yan-Shen Shan; Gayle Jameson; Teresa Macarulla; Kyung-Hun Lee; David Cunningham; Jean F Blanc; Richard A Hubner; Chang-Fang Chiu; Gilberto Schwartsmann; Jens T Siveke; Fadi Braiteh; Victor Moyo; Bruce Belanger; Navreet Dhindsa; Eliel Bayever; Daniel D Von Hoff; Li-Tzong Chen Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-11-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael G White; Megan K Applewhite; Edwin L Kaplan; Peter Angelos; Dezheng Huo; Raymon H Grogan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: David Goldstein; Robert Hassan El-Maraghi; Pascal Hammel; Volker Heinemann; Volker Kunzmann; Javier Sastre; Werner Scheithauer; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Luis Teixeira; Giampaolo Tortora; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Rosemary Young; Darryl Neil Penenberg; Brian Lu; Alfredo Romano; Daniel D Von Hoff Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Walid L Shaib; Jeb S Jones; Michael Goodman; Juan M Sarmiento; Shishir K Maithel; Kenneth Cardona; Sujata Kane; Christina Wu; Olatunji B Alese; Bassel F El-Rayes Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-02-14
Authors: Daniel H Ahn; Kavya Krishna; Marlo Blazer; Joshua Reardon; Lai Wei; Christina Wu; Kristen K Ciombor; Anne M Noonan; Sameh Mikhail; Tanios Bekaii-Saab Journal: Ther Adv Med Oncol Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 8.168
Authors: Avo Artinyan; Perry A Soriano; Christina Prendergast; Tracey Low; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Joseph Kim Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Malcolm J Moore; David Goldstein; John Hamm; Arie Figer; Joel R Hecht; Steven Gallinger; Heather J Au; Pawel Murawa; David Walde; Robert A Wolff; Daniel Campos; Robert Lim; Keyue Ding; Gary Clark; Theodora Voskoglou-Nomikos; Mieke Ptasynski; Wendy Parulekar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Tina Hsu; Nienke A de Glas; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; Capucine Baldini; Manuel Rodrigues; Stuart M Lichtman; Hans Wildiers Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Andrew Hendifar; Arsen Osipov; Jasleen Khanuja; Nicholas Nissen; Jason Naziri; Wensha Yang; Quanlin Li; Richard Tuli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: William H Ward; Caitlin R Meeker; Elizabeth Handorf; Maureen V Hill; Margret Einarson; R Katherine Alpaugh; Thomas L Holden; Igor Astsaturov; Crystal S Denlinger; Michael J Hall; Sanjay S Reddy; Elin R Sigurdson; Efrat Dotan; Matthew Zibelman; Joshua E Meyer; Jeffrey M Farma; Namrata Vijayvergia Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2021-01