| Literature DB >> 29444665 |
Tai Jun Kim1, Sohyun Kang2, Jin Wook Jeoung1, Young Kook Kim1, Ki Ho Park3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many studies have investigated the clinical benefits of Ologen for trabeculectomy. However, its benefits for Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation have not been investigated as extensively. The aim of this study was to compare the 1-year outcomes of AGV implantation with and without Ologen adjuvant for the treatment of refractory glaucoma.Entities:
Keywords: Ahmed glaucoma valve; Early hypertensive phase; Glaucoma; Ologen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29444665 PMCID: PMC5813372 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0709-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1AS-OCT image of bleb over Ologen on postoperative day 1. Healthy bleb morphology and aqueous filtering under the conjunctiva are shown
Demographic characteristics of subjects
| OAGV group ( | CAGV group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 60.9 ± 19.6 | 63.1 ± 14.1 | 0.910a |
| Female, patients (%) | 4 (50.0%) | 6 (50.0%) | 0.350b |
| Diabetes, patients (%) | 1 (12.5%) | 4 (33.3%) | 0.255b |
| Hypertension, patients (%) | 2 (25.0%) | 2 (16.7%) | 0.381b |
| Diagnosis, eyes (%) | 0.951b | ||
| Neovascular glaucoma | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (16.7%) | |
| Uveitic glaucoma | 1 (12.5%) | 1 (8.3%) | |
| Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma | 1 (12.5%) | 3 (25.0%) | |
| Primary open-angle glaucoma | 2 (25.0%) | 4 (33.4%) | |
| Congenital glaucoma | 2 (25.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | |
| Primary angle-closure glaucoma | 1 (12.5%) | 1 (8.3%) | |
| Previous glaucoma surgery, eyes (%) | 4 (50.0%) | 6 (50.0%) | 1.000b |
| Preoperative IOP (mean ± SD) | 33.4 ± 6.3 | 30.6 ± 6.8 | 0.238a |
| Number of preoperative IOP-lowering medications (mean ± SD) | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 0.473a |
aMann-Whitney U-test; bχ2-test; OAGV Ologen-augmented Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, CAGV conventional Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, SD standard deviation, IOP intraocular pressure
Success rate and early hypertensive phase frequency in both groups
| OAGV group | CAGV group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete success | 4 (50.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0.035a |
| Qualified success | 6 (75.0%) | 6 (50.0%) | 0.264a |
| Early hypertensive phase | 1 (12.5%) | 4 (33.3%) | 0.375b |
aχ2-test; bFisher’s exact test; OAGV Ologen-augmented Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, CAGV conventional Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
Fig. 2Mean IOP follow-up during postoperative 1-year in OAGV and CAGV groups. At every point, the inter-group difference failed to meet the threshold for statistical significance
Numbers of IOP-lowering medications at follow-up in both groups
| OAGV group | CAGV group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | 0.5 ± 1.3 | 0 | 0.678a |
| Month 1 | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 0.031a |
| Month 2 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 0.031a |
| Month 3 | 0.9 ± 1.4 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 0.025a |
| Month 6 | 1.1 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 1.3 | 0.082a |
| Year 1 | 1.3 ± 1.6 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 0.173a |
aMann-Whitney U-test; IOP intraocular pressure, OAGV Ologen-augmented Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation, CAGV conventional Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
Comparison of numbers of IOP-lowering medications according to occurrence of early hypertensive phase
| EHP (−) group ( | EHP (+) group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 0.001a |
| Month 2 | 1.0 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 0.001a |
| Month 3 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.000a |
| Month 6 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.002a |
| Year 1 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 0.005a |
aMann-Whitney U-test; IOP intraocular pressure, EHP early hypertensive phase