Literature DB >> 29443023

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage.

Xiangduo Kong1, Gladys M S Cruz2, Bárbara A Silva2, Nicole M Wakida2, Nima Khatibzadeh2, Michael W Berns3, Kyoko Yokomori4.   

Abstract

DNA damage induces specific signaling and repair responses in the cell, which is critical for protection of genome integrity. Laser microirradiation became a valuable experimental tool to investigate the DNA damage response (DDR) in vivo. It allows real-time high-resolution single-cell analysis of macromolecular dynamics in response to laser-induced damage confined to a submicrometer region in the cell nucleus. However, various laser conditions have been used without appreciation of differences in the types of damage induced. As a result, the nature of the damage is often not well characterized or controlled, causing apparent inconsistencies in the recruitment or modification profiles. We demonstrated that different irradiation conditions (i.e., different wavelengths as well as different input powers (irradiances) of a femtosecond (fs) near-infrared (NIR) laser) induced distinct DDR and repair protein assemblies. This reflects the type of DNA damage produced. This protocol describes how titration of laser input power allows induction of different amounts and complexities of DNA damage, which can easily be monitored by detection of base and crosslinking damages, differential poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) signaling, and pathway-specific repair factor assemblies at damage sites. Once the damage conditions are determined, it is possible to investigate the effects of different damage complexity and differential damage signaling as well as depletion of upstream factor(s) on any factor of interest.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29443023      PMCID: PMC5912314          DOI: 10.3791/56213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  69 in total

1.  Scc1 sumoylation by Mms21 promotes sister chromatid recombination through counteracting Wapl.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Xiangduo Kong; Zhejian Ji; Weihua Zeng; Patrick Ryan Potts; Kyoko Yokomori; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  53BP1 exchanges slowly at the sites of DNA damage and appears to require RNA for its association with chromatin.

Authors:  Fiona Pryde; Shirin Khalili; Kathryn Robertson; Jim Selfridge; Ann-Marie Ritchie; David W Melton; Denis Jullien; Yasuhisa Adachi
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Synthetic lethality and cancer therapy: lessons learned from the development of PARP inhibitors.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology.

Authors:  M W Berns; J Aist; J Edwards; K Strahs; J Girton; P McNeill; J B Rattner; M Kitzes; M Hammer-Wilson; L H Liaw; A Siemens; M Koonce; S Peterson; S Brenner; J Burt; R Walter; P J Bryant; D van Dyk; J Coulombe; T Cahill; G S Berns
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair.

Authors:  Irene Chiolo; Aki Minoda; Serafin U Colmenares; Aris Polyzos; Sylvain V Costes; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Monitoring DNA breaks in optically highlighted chromatin in living cells by laser scanning confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Kruhlak; Arkady Celeste; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Highlighting the DNA damage response with ultrashort laser pulses in the near infrared and kinetic modeling.

Authors:  Elisa Ferrando-May; Martin Tomas; Philipp Blumhardt; Martin Stöckl; Matthias Fuchs; Alfred Leitenstorfer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 8.  Replication and transcription: shaping the landscape of the genome.

Authors:  Lyubomira Chakalova; Emmanuel Debrand; Jennifer A Mitchell; Cameron S Osborne; Peter Fraser
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  PARP1-dependent recruitment of KDM4D histone demethylase to DNA damage sites promotes double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Hanan Khoury-Haddad; Noga Guttmann-Raviv; Inbal Ipenberg; David Huggins; Anand D Jeyasekharan; Nabieh Ayoub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark.

Authors:  Amélie Fradet-Turcotte; Marella D Canny; Cristina Escribano-Díaz; Alexandre Orthwein; Charles C Y Leung; Hao Huang; Marie-Claude Landry; Julianne Kitevski-LeBlanc; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Frank Sicheri; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phasor histone FLIM-FRET microscopy quantifies spatiotemporal rearrangement of chromatin architecture during the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Jieqiong Lou; Lorenzo Scipioni; Belinda K Wright; Tara K Bartolec; Jessie Zhang; V Pragathi Masamsetti; Katharina Gaus; Enrico Gratton; Anthony J Cesare; Elizabeth Hinde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.