Hugo Botha1, William G Mantyh1, Jonathan Graff-Radford1, Mary M Machulda1, Scott A Przybelski1, Heather J Wiste1, Matthew L Senjem1, Joseph E Parisi1, Ronald C Petersen1, Melissa E Murray1, Bradley F Boeve1, Val J Lowe1, David S Knopman1, Clifford R Jack1, David T Jones2. 1. From the Departments of Neurology (H.B., W.G.M., J.G.-R., R.C.P., B.F.B., D.S.K., D.T.J.), Psychiatry and Psychology (M.M.M.), Radiology (S.A.P., H.J.W., M.L.S., C.R.J., D.T.J.), Pathology (J.E.P.), and Nuclear Medicine (V.J.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neuroscience (M.E.M.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. 2. From the Departments of Neurology (H.B., W.G.M., J.G.-R., R.C.P., B.F.B., D.S.K., D.T.J.), Psychiatry and Psychology (M.M.M.), Radiology (S.A.P., H.J.W., M.L.S., C.R.J., D.T.J.), Pathology (J.E.P.), and Nuclear Medicine (V.J.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neuroscience (M.E.M.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. Jones.david@mayo.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the phenomenon of tau-negative amnestic dementia mimicking Alzheimer disease (AD) clinically and radiologically and to highlight the importance of biomarkers in AD research. METHODS: Eight participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia were evaluated by a behavioral neurologist and had a standardized neuropsychological battery performed. All participants completed structural (MRI) and molecular (amyloid and tau PET) imaging. AD-signature thickness and adjusted hippocampal volume served as structural biomarkers, while standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) from validated regions of interest for amyloid and tau PET were used to determine molecular biomarker status. RESULTS: All participants were thought to have AD as the primary driver of their symptoms before any PET imaging. All participants had hippocampal atrophy, and 2 participants fell below the AD-signature thickness cutoff for elderly controls (2.57), with a further 3 falling below the more stringent cutoff based on young controls (2.67). Four participants were amyloid positive (SUVR >1.42), and all were tau negative (SUVR <1.33). CONCLUSIONS: The participants presented here were clinically impaired, with structural imaging evidence of neurodegeneration, in the absence of any significant tau accumulation. Therefore, AD is unlikely as a cause of their clinical presentation and neurodegenerative imaging findings. Several implications are discussed, including the need to establish amyloid and tau positivity in N+ participants before enrolling them in trials of disease-modifying therapy agents for AD.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the phenomenon of tau-negative amnestic dementia mimicking Alzheimer disease (AD) clinically and radiologically and to highlight the importance of biomarkers in AD research. METHODS: Eight participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia were evaluated by a behavioral neurologist and had a standardized neuropsychological battery performed. All participants completed structural (MRI) and molecular (amyloid and tau PET) imaging. AD-signature thickness and adjusted hippocampal volume served as structural biomarkers, while standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) from validated regions of interest for amyloid and tau PET were used to determine molecular biomarker status. RESULTS: All participants were thought to have AD as the primary driver of their symptoms before any PET imaging. All participants had hippocampal atrophy, and 2 participants fell below the AD-signature thickness cutoff for elderly controls (2.57), with a further 3 falling below the more stringent cutoff based on young controls (2.67). Four participants were amyloid positive (SUVR >1.42), and all were tau negative (SUVR <1.33). CONCLUSIONS: The participants presented here were clinically impaired, with structural imaging evidence of neurodegeneration, in the absence of any significant tau accumulation. Therefore, AD is unlikely as a cause of their clinical presentation and neurodegenerative imaging findings. Several implications are discussed, including the need to establish amyloid and tau positivity in N+ participants before enrolling them in trials of disease-modifying therapy agents for AD.
Authors: Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Ronald C Petersen; Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Leslie M Shaw; Prashanthi Vemuri; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Timothy G Lesnick; Vernon S Pankratz; Michael C Donohue; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Kris A Johnson; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Gregory A Jicha; Robert J Ivnik; Glenn E Smith; Eric G Tangalos; Heiko Braak; Emre Kokmen Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-05
Authors: Adam J Schwarz; Peng Yu; Bradley B Miller; Sergey Shcherbinin; James Dickson; Michael Navitsky; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael D Devous; Mark S Mintun Journal: Brain Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; David T Jones; Kejal Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Prashanthi Vemuri; Denise A Reyes; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Val J Lowe; Patrick J Peller; Stephen D Weigand; Catalina Montoya Quintero; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Prashanthi Vemuri; Matthew L Senjem; Lennon Jordan; Clifford R Jack; David Knopman; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen Salloway; Reisa Sperling; Nick C Fox; Kaj Blennow; William Klunk; Murray Raskind; Marwan Sabbagh; Lawrence S Honig; Anton P Porsteinsson; Steven Ferris; Marcel Reichert; Nzeera Ketter; Bijan Nejadnik; Volkmar Guenzler; Maja Miloslavsky; Daniel Wang; Yuan Lu; Julia Lull; Iulia Cristina Tudor; Enchi Liu; Michael Grundman; Eric Yuen; Ronald Black; H Robert Brashear Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Charles D Smith; Erin L Abner; Bernard J Wilfred; Wang-Xia Wang; Janna H Neltner; Michael Baker; David W Fardo; Richard J Kryscio; Stephen W Scheff; Gregory A Jicha; Kurt A Jellinger; Linda J Van Eldik; Frederick A Schmitt Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 15.887
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; David S Knopman; Val Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Mary M Machulda; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Howard H Feldman; Giovanni B Frisoni; Harald Hampel; William J Jagust; Keith A Johnson; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Philip Scheltens; Reisa A Sperling; Bruno Dubois Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Terry M Therneau; Stephen D Weigand; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Val J Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Mary M Machulda; Christopher G Schwarz; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David T Jones; Rosebud O Roberts; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joseph Therriault; Tharick A Pascoal; Andrea L Benedet; Cecile Tissot; Melissa Savard; Mira Chamoun; Firoza Lussier; Min Su Kang; Gleb Berzgin; Tina Wang; Jaime Fernandes-Arias; Gassan Massarweh; Jean-Paul Soucy; Paolo Vitali; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Serge Gauthier; Pedro Rosa-Neto Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tengfei Guo; Deniz Korman; Renaud La Joie; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; William J Jagust; Susan M Landau Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Hugo Botha; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; David S Knopman; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David T Jones; Tanis J Ferman; Bradley F Boeve; Kejal Kantarci; Val J Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Julie A Fields; Mary M Machulda; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Hugo Botha; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David T Jones; Tanis J Ferman; Bradley F Boeve; Kejal Kantarci; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Jennifer Whitwell; Keith Josephs; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 13.501