Stephen Salloway1, Reisa Sperling, Nick C Fox, Kaj Blennow, William Klunk, Murray Raskind, Marwan Sabbagh, Lawrence S Honig, Anton P Porsteinsson, Steven Ferris, Marcel Reichert, Nzeera Ketter, Bijan Nejadnik, Volkmar Guenzler, Maja Miloslavsky, Daniel Wang, Yuan Lu, Julia Lull, Iulia Cristina Tudor, Enchi Liu, Michael Grundman, Eric Yuen, Ronald Black, H Robert Brashear. 1. From Butler Hospital, Providence, RI (S.S.); Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (R.S.); University College London, Institute of Neurology, London (N.C.F.); University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden (K.B.); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (W.K.); Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle (M.R.); Cleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research/Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ (M.S.); Columbia University (L.S.H.) and New York University Langone Medical Center (S.F.), New York; University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY (A.P.P.); Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research and Development, South San Francisco, CA (M.R., N.K., B.N., V.G., M.M., D.W., Y.L., I.C.T., E.L., E.Y., H.R.B.); Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ (J.L.); Global R&D Partners and the University of California, San Diego - both in San Diego (M.G.); and Pfizer, Collegeville, PA (R.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, a humanized anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody, is in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease--one involving 1121 carriers of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele and the other involving 1331 noncarriers. Bapineuzumab or placebo, with doses varying by study, was administered by intravenous infusion every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary outcome measures were scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog11, with scores ranging from 0 to 70 and higher scores indicating greater impairment) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating less impairment). A total of 1090 carriers and 1114 noncarriers were included in the efficacy analysis. Secondary outcome measures included findings on positron-emission tomographic amyloid imaging with the use of Pittsburgh compound B (PIB-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (phospho-tau) concentrations. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. At week 78, the between-group differences in the change from baseline in the ADAS-cog11 and DAD scores (bapineuzumab group minus placebo group) were -0.2 (P=0.80) and -1.2 (P=0.34), respectively, in the carrier study; the corresponding differences in the noncarrier study were -0.3 (P=0.64) and 2.8 (P=0.07) with the 0.5-mg-per-kilogram dose of bapineuzumab and 0.4 (P=0.62) and 0.9 (P=0.55) with the 1.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. The major safety finding was amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema among patients receiving bapineuzumab, which increased with bapineuzumab dose and APOE ε4 allele number and which led to discontinuation of the 2.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. Between-group differences were observed with respect to PIB-PET and cerebrospinal fluid phospho-tau concentrations in APOE ε4 allele carriers but not in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease, despite treatment differences in biomarkers observed in APOE ε4 carriers. (Funded by Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and Pfizer; Bapineuzumab 301 and 302 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00575055 and NCT00574132, and EudraCT number, 2009-012748-17.).
BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, a humanized anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody, is in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease--one involving 1121 carriers of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele and the other involving 1331 noncarriers. Bapineuzumab or placebo, with doses varying by study, was administered by intravenous infusion every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary outcome measures were scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog11, with scores ranging from 0 to 70 and higher scores indicating greater impairment) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating less impairment). A total of 1090 carriers and 1114 noncarriers were included in the efficacy analysis. Secondary outcome measures included findings on positron-emission tomographic amyloid imaging with the use of Pittsburgh compound B (PIB-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (phospho-tau) concentrations. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. At week 78, the between-group differences in the change from baseline in the ADAS-cog11 and DAD scores (bapineuzumab group minus placebo group) were -0.2 (P=0.80) and -1.2 (P=0.34), respectively, in the carrier study; the corresponding differences in the noncarrier study were -0.3 (P=0.64) and 2.8 (P=0.07) with the 0.5-mg-per-kilogram dose of bapineuzumab and 0.4 (P=0.62) and 0.9 (P=0.55) with the 1.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. The major safety finding was amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema among patients receiving bapineuzumab, which increased with bapineuzumab dose and APOE ε4 allele number and which led to discontinuation of the 2.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. Between-group differences were observed with respect to PIB-PET and cerebrospinal fluid phospho-tau concentrations in APOE ε4 allele carriers but not in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease, despite treatment differences in biomarkers observed in APOE ε4 carriers. (Funded by Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and Pfizer; Bapineuzumab 301 and 302 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00575055 and NCT00574132, and EudraCT number, 2009-012748-17.).
Authors: F Bard; C Cannon; R Barbour; R L Burke; D Games; H Grajeda; T Guido; K Hu; J Huang; K Johnson-Wood; K Khan; D Kholodenko; M Lee; I Lieberburg; R Motter; M Nguyen; F Soriano; N Vasquez; K Weiss; B Welch; P Seubert; D Schenk; T Yednock Journal: Nat Med Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Frédérique Bard; Robin Barbour; Catherine Cannon; Robert Carretto; Michael Fox; Dora Games; Teresa Guido; Kathleen Hoenow; Kang Hu; Kelly Johnson-Wood; Karen Khan; Dora Kholodenko; Celeste Lee; Mike Lee; Ruth Motter; Minh Nguyen; Amanda Reed; Dale Schenk; Pearl Tang; Nicki Vasquez; Peter Seubert; Ted Yednock Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E Vanmechelen; H Vanderstichele; P Davidsson; E Van Kerschaver; B Van Der Perre; M Sjögren; N Andreasen; K Blennow Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2000-05-05 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ganesh M Shankar; Shaomin Li; Tapan H Mehta; Amaya Garcia-Munoz; Nina E Shepardson; Imelda Smith; Francesca M Brett; Michael A Farrell; Michael J Rowan; Cynthia A Lemere; Ciaran M Regan; Dominic M Walsh; Bernardo L Sabatini; Dennis J Selkoe Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-06-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Samantha Burnham; Pierrick Bourgeat; Belinda Brown; Kathryn A Ellis; Olivier Salvado; Cassandra Szoeke; S Lance Macaulay; Ralph Martins; Paul Maruff; David Ames; Christopher C Rowe; Colin L Masters Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: S Salloway; R Sperling; S Gilman; N C Fox; K Blennow; M Raskind; M Sabbagh; L S Honig; R Doody; C H van Dyck; R Mulnard; J Barakos; K M Gregg; E Liu; I Lieberburg; D Schenk; R Black; M Grundman Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Manuel Buttini; Eliezer Masliah; Robin Barbour; Henry Grajeda; Ruth Motter; Kelly Johnson-Wood; Karen Khan; Peter Seubert; Stephen Freedman; Dale Schenk; Dora Games Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: D L Bailey; B J Pichler; B Gückel; H Barthel; A J Beer; J Bremerich; J Czernin; A Drzezga; C Franzius; V Goh; M Hartenbach; H Iida; A Kjaer; C la Fougère; C N Ladefoged; I Law; K Nikolaou; H H Quick; O Sabri; J Schäfer; M Schäfers; H F Wehrl; T Beyer Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Gaël Chételat; Dennis Dickson; Anne M Fagan; Giovanni B Frisoni; William Jagust; Elizabeth C Mormino; Ronald C Petersen; Reisa A Sperling; Wiesje M van der Flier; Victor L Villemagne; Pieter J Visser; Stephanie J B Vos Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Terry M Therneau; Val J Lowe; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; David T Jones; Kejal Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Prashanthi Vemuri; Denise A Reyes; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kelvin K Leung; Ian M Malone; Sebastien Ourselin; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Nick C Fox Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 6.556