Literature DB >> 29435309

Fecal immunochemical tests in combination with blood tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma detection-systematic review.

Tobias Niedermaier1, Korbinian Weigl1,2, Michael Hoffmeister1, Hermann Brenner1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common but largely preventable cancer. Although fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs, they miss some of the cancers and most advanced adenomas (AAs). The potential of blood tests in complementing FITs for the detection of CRC or AA has not yet been systematically investigated.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of performance of FIT combined with an additional blood test for CRC and AA detection versus FIT alone. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until June 9, 2017.
RESULTS: Some markers substantially increased sensitivity for CRC when combined with FIT, albeit typically at a major loss of specificity. For AA, no relevant increase in sensitivity could be achieved.
CONCLUSION: Combining FIT and blood tests might be a promising approach to enhance sensitivity of CRC screening, but comprehensive evaluation of promising marker combinations in screening populations is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; FIT; accuracy; advanced adenoma; area under the ROC curve; blood tests; combination

Year:  2017        PMID: 29435309      PMCID: PMC5802681          DOI: 10.1177/2050640617737004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  29 in total

Review 1.  Sensitivity estimates of blood-based tests for colorectal cancer detection: impact of overrepresentation of advanced stage disease.

Authors:  Sha Tao; Sabrina Hundt; Ulrike Haug; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Understanding the direction of bias in studies of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Michael A Kohn; Christopher R Carpenter; Thomas B Newman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Performance of a second-generation methylated SEPT9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasm.

Authors:  Peng Jin; Qian Kang; Xin Wang; Lang Yang; Yang Yu; Na Li; Yu-qi He; Xiaoliang Han; Jie Hang; Jing Zhang; Lele Song; Ying Han; Jian-qiu Sheng
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Sha Tao
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Evaluation of a 5-Marker Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Setting.

Authors:  Simone Werner; Friedemann Krause; Vinzent Rolny; Matthias Strobl; David Morgenstern; Christian Datz; Hongda Chen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Matthias Kloor; Christian Peter Pox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Serum sCD26 for colorectal cancer screening in family-risk individuals: comparison with faecal immunochemical test.

Authors:  O Otero-Estévez; L De Chiara; F J Rodríguez-Berrocal; M Páez de la Cadena; J Cubiella; I Castro; C Gonzalez-Mao; V Hernandez; V S Martínez-Zorzano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options.

Authors:  Iyad A Issa; Malak Noureddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  Methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9): A promising blood-based biomarker for the detection and screening of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Holli A Loomans-Kropp; Yurong Song; Manish Gala; Aparna R Parikh; Emily E Van Seventer; Rocio Alvarez; Megan P Hitchins; Robert H Shoemaker; Asad Umar
Journal:  Cancer Res Commun       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Yesilda Balavarca; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 12.045

3.  Lessons From a Systematic Literature Search on Diagnostic DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer: How to Increase Research Value and Decrease Research Waste?

Authors:  Zheng Feng; Cary J G Oberije; Alouisa J P van de Wetering; Alexander Koch; Kim A D Wouters; Nathalie Vaes; Ad A M Masclee; Beatriz Carvalho; Gerrit A Meijer; Maurice P Zeegers; James G Herman; Veerle Melotte; Manon van Engeland; Kim M Smits
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.

Authors:  Jennifer Anne Cooper; Ronan Ryan; Nick Parsons; Chris Stinton; Tom Marshall; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Triage May Improve Selection to Colonoscopy and Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Colonoscopies.

Authors:  Mathias M Petersen; Linnea Ferm; Jakob Kleif; Thomas B Piper; Eva Rømer; Ib J Christensen; Hans J Nielsen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Faecal immunochemical test is superior to symptoms in predicting pathology in patients with suspected colorectal cancer symptoms referred on a 2WW pathway: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Theo Georgiou Delisle; Michelle Chen; Sally Benton; Muti Abulafi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Variation of Positive Predictive Values of Fecal Immunochemical Tests by Polygenic Risk Score in a Large Screening Cohort.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Yesilda Balavarca; Anton Gies; Korbinian Weigl; Feng Guo; Elizabeth Alwers; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.396

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.