| Literature DB >> 29435180 |
Eleonora Vighi1, Andreas Rentsch2, Philipp Henning3, Antonella Comitato1, Dorit Hoffmann1, Daniela Bertinetti3, Evelina Bertolotti1, Frank Schwede2, Friedrich W Herberg3, Hans-Gottfried Genieser2, Valeria Marigo1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: MNT1; PKG2; SkMel28; cGMP; pVASP
Year: 2017 PMID: 29435180 PMCID: PMC5797051 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1PKG expression in melanoma cell lines
(A) Expression of PKG1α, PKG1β and PKG2 in MNT1 (M) and SkMel28 (S) was assessed by RT-PCR. S26 was analyzed as reference gene. Primers for PKG2 could detect the two major isoforms that are expressed in both melanoma cell lines. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis using specific antibodies for the three PKG isozymes. (C) Immunoblotting using specific antibodies for the three PKG isozymes in MNT1 (M) and SkMel28 (S). Quantifications of protein levels detected by immunoblotting are shown below of each blot. The arrow indicates the band at the expected molecular weight for PKG2 (86 kDa). MW= Molecular weight: in RT-PCR as base pairs (bp) (A) and in immunoblotting as kDa (C).
Figure 2Structures of monomeric and dimeric cGMP analogues displayed in the sodium salt form
(A) R1+R2 resemble the β-phenyl-1,N2-etheno (PET) modification, while R3 refers to the 8-position (C8) of cGMP and contains either bromine as residue or the linking moiety (including spacer and coupling/bridging functions). (B–D) Normalized activation curves of (B) PKG1α, (C) PKG1β and (D) PKG2 with cGMP and PA1-PA6.
PKG1α, PKG1β and PKG2 activation constants by PA1, PA2, PA3, PA4, PA5 and PA6
| mean ± SD | 49 ± 4 nM | 26 ± 5 nM | 4.6 ± 0.2 nM | 5.7 ± 1.0 nM | < 0.8 nM | 7.7 ± 1.3 nM | < 2 nM |
| mean ± SD | 430 ± 30 nM | 320 ± 20 nM | 16 ± 3 nM | 13 ± 4 nM | < 1 nM | 21 ± 2 nM | < 1 nM |
| mean ± SD | 250 ± 20 nM | 28 ± 3 nM | 300 ± 45 nM | 58 ± 5 nM | < 1 nM | 2.1 ± 0.6 nM | 110 ± 30 nM |
Figure 3Cell viability assay after treatment with cGMP analogues
In all experiments values of not treated cells (NT) were set as 100% cell viability. (A–B) Dose responses in MNT1 (A) and in SkMel28 (B) treated with monomeric cGMP analogues for 24 h. (C–D) Dose-responses in MNT1 (C) and in SkMel28 (D) treated with dimeric cGMP analogues for 24 h. (E) Time-course assay in MNT1 cells treated with PA4 at 1 μM (*p = 0.04). (F) Time-course assay on SkMel28 treated with PA5 at 1 μM (p = 0.03*). Error bars: SD. Statistical comparison: in A-B-C-D NT vs treated at each concentration with Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test; in E-F NT vs treated using Student's paired two tailed t-test. Significance levels: p < 0.05 = *p < 0.01 = **p < 0.001 = ***. Red asterisks indicate significant increase of cell viability.
Figure 4Down-regulation of PKG2 in MNT1 and SkMel28 by shRNA
(A) Immunoblotting of PKG2 in MNT1 or SkMel28 not infected with retrovirus expressing any shRNA (MNT1-UI and SkMel28-UI), MNT1 or SkMel28 infected with a retrovirus expressing a scrambled control shRNA (MNT1-Scrambled and SkMel28-Scrambled), MNT1 or SkMel28 infected with a retrovirus expressing an shRNA targeting mRNA for PKG2 (MNT1-ShPKG2 and SkMel28-ShPKG2). Western blotting was normalized analyzing actin (lower panel). Histograms at the right-hand side show the quantification of PKG2 protein. (B) MTT assay on MNT1-UI, MNT1-Scrambled and MNT1-ShPKG2 not treated (NT) and after treatment with 1 μM of PA4 for 24 h (PA4) and on SkMel28-UI, SkMel28-Scrambled and SkMel28-ShPKG2 not treated (NT) and after treatment with 1 μM of PA5 for 24 h or 72 h (PA5). Not treated cells (NT) in uninfected (UI) samples were set as 100% cell viability. Error bars: SD. Statistical comparison: NT vs treated with Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test. Significance levels: p < 0.05 = *p < 0.01 = **p < 0.001 =***.
Figure 5Cell death and proliferation assays
(A) Cell death was analyzed by ethidium homodimer (Eth Hom) staining in untreated (NT) vs PA4 treated (PA4) MNT1 cells. White arrows indicate positive cells. Percentage of cell death is shown below. (B) Cell proliferation was analyzed by BrdU incorporation (BrdU) in untreated (NT) vs PA4 treated (PA4) MNT1cells. Percentage of cell proliferation is shown below. (C) Cell death was analyzed by ethidium homodimer (Eth Hom) staining at 24 h and 72 h in untreated (NT) vs PA5 treated (PA5) SkMel28 cells. Percentage of cell death is shown below. (D) Cell proliferation was analyzed by BrdU incorporation (BrdU) at 24 h and 72 h in untreated (NT) vs PA5 treated (PA5) SkMel28 cells. Percentage of cell proliferation is shown below. Error bars: SD. Statistical comparison: NT vs treated with Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test; Significance levels: p < 0.05 = *p < 0.01 = **p < 0.001 = ***.
Figure 6SkMel28 cell migration assay after treatment with PA5
(A) Images of the wound healing assay on SkMel28 cells not treated (NT) or treated with 1 μM PA5 for 24 h or 72 h. t = 0 indicates the starting point of the assay. (B) The entire wound was analyzed and the number of cells that migrated into the wound was counted. Error bars: SD. Statistical comparison: NT vs treated with Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test; Significance levels: p < 0.05 = *p < 0.01 = **p < 0.001 = ***.
Figure 7Analysis of VASP phosphorylation at S239
(A–B) VASP phosphorylation at S239 was analyzed in MNT1 cells not treated (NT) and treated with 1 μM PA4 for 24 h. (A) Immunolocalization of S239 pVASP shows increased pVASP after treatment. White arrows indicate the nuclear localization of pVASP. At the right-hand side, confocal analysis shows one optical section at the nuclear level confirming nuclear localization of S239 pVASP in PA4 treated MNT1. (B) Immunoblotting on nuclear extracts and cytoplasmic extracts of pVASP phosphorylated at S239 in MNT1 cells not treated (NT) or PA4 and PA5 treated. Treatment was performed at 1μM concentration for 24 h. The blot was normalized by the analysis of tubulin for cytoplasm extracts and histone H3 for nuclear extracts. (C–D) VASP phosphorylation at S239 was analyzed in SkMel28 cells not treated (NT) and treated with 1 μM PA5 for 24 h and 72 h. (C) Immunolocalization of S239 pVASP shows increased pVASP after treatment. (D) Immunoblotting on nuclear extracts and cytoplasmic extracts of pVASP phosphorylated at S239 in SkMel28 cells not treated (NT) or PA4 and PA5 treated. Treatment was performed with 1μM concentration of the compounds for 24 h. The blot was normalized by the analysis of tubulin for cytoplasm extracts and histone H3 for nuclear extracts. (E) Immunoblotting of RhoA phosphorylated at S188 (pRhoA) in MNT1 cells not treated (NT) or treated with 1 μM PA4 for 24 h and in SkMel28 cells not treated (NT) or treated with 1 μM of PA5 for 24 h or 72 h. The immunoblot was normalized by analysis of actin.
Figure 8Analysis of VASP phosphorylation at S157
(A–B) VASP phosphorylation at S157 was evaluated in MNT1 cells not treated (NT) or treated with PA4 at 1 μM for 24 h. (A) Immunolocalization of S157 pVASP shows decreased pVASP after treatment. (B) Immunoblotting of pVASP phosphorylated at S157 in MNT1 cells. The immunoblot was normalized by analysis of actin. The histogram at the right-hand side shows quantitative analysis of three replicates. (C–D) VASP phosphorylation at S157 was evaluated in SkMel28 cells not treated (NT) or treated with PA5 at 1 μM for 24 h or 72 h. (C) Immunolocalization of S157 pVASP shows no change after treatment. (D) Immunoblotting of pVASP at S157 in SkMel28 cells after treatment with PA5 at 1 μM for 24 h or 72 h. The immunoblot was normalized by analysis of actin. The histogram shows quantitative analysis of three replicates. Error bars: SD. Statistical comparison: NT vs treated with Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test; Significance levels: p < 0.05 = *p < 0.01 = **p < 0.001 = ***.
PKA activation
| RIα ( | RIIα ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 ± 0.8 | 0.0 ± 2.1 | ||
| 100 ± 2 | 100 ± 2 | ||
| 1.7 ± 0.9 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | ||
| 10.4 ± 3.3 | 1.1 ± 2.5 | ||
| 1.4 ± 2.9 | 0.6 ± 2.2 | ||
| –0.2 ± 2.2 | –0.4 ± 1.5 | ||
| 9.1 ± 0.9 | 2.2 ± 3.2 | ||
| 6.0 ± 3.1 | 1.6 ± 3.2 | ||
| 1.6 ± 3.3 | 1.6 ± 2.6 | ||
Normalized PKA activation data of human PKA isoforms RIα and RIIα employing 250 nM of cAMP, cGMP, PA1, PA2, PA3, PA4, PA5 and PA6, respectively, in in vitro PKA activation assays (see Materials and Methods). Values denote the mean ± standard deviation (SD). n = number of measurements.
Primers for RT-PCR
| Forward primer | Reverse primer | |
|---|---|---|
| 5′-GACAGGCATTCCGGAAGTTC-3′ | 5′-TGCGACAGCTCCAAGTTCTT-3′ | |
| 5′-CCAGGATCTCAGCCATGTG-3′ | 5′-GGATCTGCGACAGCTCCA-3′ | |
| 5′-TACCTTGAAGGATATGTGGCAAACC-3′ | 5′-GCCTCCAGAAGCATGTATACATAC-3′ | |
| 5′-CCGTGCCTCCAAGATGACAA-3′ | 5′-CGAATGACGAATTTCTTAATGGCC-3′ |
In brackets the length in base pairs (bp) is indicated.
List of primary antibodies used in western blotting (WB) and immunofluorescence (IF) experiments
| Antibody | Provider | Cat. no. | Dilution | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goat-anti-PKG1α | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | Sc-10335 | 1:1000 | WB |
| Goat-anti-PKG1β | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | Sc-10341 | 1:1000 | WB |
| Rabbit-anti-PKG2 | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | Sc-25430 | 1:1000 | WB |
| Goat-anti-BIP (GRP78 (c-20) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | Sc-1051 | 1:100 | IF |
| Mouse-anti-cytochrome C | BD Biosciences | 556432 | 1:100 | IF |
| Sheep-anti-cGMP | Jan de Vente & Harry Steinbusch, Maastricht University, the Netherlands | /// | 1:500 | IF |
| Mouse anti-pVASP at S239 | Nanotools | 0047-100/VASP-16C2 | 1:2500 | WB |
| Mouse anti-pVASP at S157 | Nanotools | 0085-100/VASP-5C6 | 1:2500 | WB |
| Rabbit anti-pRhoA at S188 | Abcam | Ab32046 | 1:1000 | WB |
| Mouse-anti-actin | Sigma-Aldrich | A2228 | 1:2000 | WB |
| Rabbit anti-Histone H3 | Cell Signaling | 9715 | 1:1000 | WB |
| Mouse anti- Tubulin | Cell Signaling | 2144 | 1:2000 | WB |