| Literature DB >> 29434250 |
Fernanda Neumann1, Stéphanie Gourdain1, Christelle Albac2, Alain D Dekker2,3, Linh Chi Bui4, Julien Dairou5, Isabelle Schmitz-Afonso1, Nathalie Hue1, Fernando Rodrigues-Lima4, Jean M Delabar2, Marie-Claude Potier2, Jean-Pierre Le Caër1, David Touboul1, Benoît Delatour2, Kevin Cariou1, Robert H Dodd6.
Abstract
Inhibition of DYRK1A kinase, produced by chromosome 21 and consequently overproduced in trisomy 21 subjects, has been suggested as a therapeutic approach to treating the cognitive deficiencies observed in Down syndrome (DS). We now report the synthesis and potent DYRK1A inhibitory activities of fluoro derivatives of 3,5-di(polyhydroxyaryl)-7-azaindoles (F-DANDYs). One of these compounds (3-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, 5a) was selected for in vivo studies of cognitive rescuing effects in a standard mouse model of DS (Ts65Dn line). Using the Morris water maze task, Ts65Dn mice treated i.p. with 20 mg/kg of 5a performed significantly better than Ts65Dn mice treated with placebo, confirming the promnesiant effect of 5a in the trisomic mice. Overall, these results demonstrate for the first time that selective and competitive inhibition of DYRK1A kinase by the F-DANDY derivative 5a may provide a viable treatment strategy for combating the memory and learning deficiencies encountered in DS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29434250 PMCID: PMC5809559 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20984-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Naturally-occurring and synthetic inhibitors of DYRK1A kinase.
Figure 2Structures of the most active DYRK1A competitive inhibitors of the 3,5-diaryl-7-indole family (DANDYs)[34].
Figure 3Chemical synthesis of the target substituted 3,5-diaryl-7-azaindole derivatives 5a-5ga.
Figure 4In Vitro inhibition of DYRK1A by 3,5-diaryl-7-azaindoles 4a-4f compared to activities of previously reported DANDYs (IC50 values in μM)[34].
Figure 5In Vitro inhibition of DYRK1A by 3,5-diaryl-7-azaindoles 5a-5g compared to activities of previously reported DANDYs (IC50 values in nM)[34].
Inhibition of KB Cell Proliferation in vitro by Selected F-DANDYs.
| Compound | % Growth inhibition 10−5 M | % Growth inhibition 10−6 M |
|---|---|---|
|
| 49 ± 3 | 0 ± 9 |
|
| 22 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 |
|
| 66 ± 3 | 30 ± 1 |
|
| 95 ± 1 | 46 ± 1 |
Inhibition of Tau Phosphorylation by DYRK1A by Selected DANDYs.
| Compound | IC50 for tau phosphorylation (μM) |
|---|---|
|
| 1 |
|
| 0.38 |
| Harmine | 0.19 |
Figure 6In vitro inhibition of a panel of 13 kinases by F-DANDYs 5a and 5g (5.10−8 M) and harmine (10−6 M) (100 represents full inhibition of the enzyme).
Figure 7Evolution of compound 5a concentration in plasma extracts after i.p. injection in WT mice. Standard deviations are noted after 3 injections except for points at 5.4, 8, 30 and 45 min where 3 extractions of each sample were realized.
Figure 8Mice were trained in a standard spatial learning protocol (MWM paradigm). (A) All mice showed a gradual improvement across training sessions. As expected, Ts65Dn mice showed a behavioral impairment (increased path lengths to reach the goal location as compared to WT mice). This deficit was partly corrected following treatment with 5a. (B) The same differences between groups were observed using pooled data over the 5 training sessions. Overall comparisons between groups: *p < 0.05; **p < .01; ***p < 0.001. Different from control (WT-Vehicle group): #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01; ###p < 0.001.
Figure 9Structure of internal standard compound V.