| Literature DB >> 29433518 |
Andrew Gdowski1, Kaitlyn Johnson2, Sunil Shah1, Ignacy Gryczynski1, Jamboor Vishwanatha1, Amalendu Ranjan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The process of optimization and fabrication of nanoparticle synthesis for preclinical studies can be challenging and time consuming. Traditional small scale laboratory synthesis techniques suffer from batch to batch variability. Additionally, the parameters used in the original formulation must be re-optimized due to differences in fabrication techniques for clinical production. Several low flow microfluidic synthesis processes have been reported in recent years for developing nanoparticles that are a hybrid between polymeric nanoparticles and liposomes. However, use of high flow microfluidic synthetic techniques has not been described for this type of nanoparticle system, which we will term as nanolipomer. In this manuscript, we describe the successful optimization and functional assessment of nanolipomers fabricated using a microfluidic synthesis method under high flow parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Microfluidic; Nanoparticle synthesis; Optimization; Preclinical batch; Scale up
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29433518 PMCID: PMC5808420 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-018-0339-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of synthesis process. Staggered herringbone based microfluidic chip for synthesizing the nanolipomer nanoparticles. The PLGA + drug core is formed by nano-precipitation in the microfluidic chip and introduced from one inlet while the DSPE-PEG lipid coating is injected from the opposite port. The final nanolipomer is collected in the third port after rapid mixing has occurred
Fig. 2Instrument parameters optimization. a Effect of total flow rate (TFR) on the size and polydispersity (PDI) of the nanolipomers at polymer concentration of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/ml (DSPE-PEG concentration = 40%, aqueous:solvent FRR = 1:1). b Effect of aqueous:solvent flow rate ratio (FRR) on the size and polydispersity (PDI) of nanolipomers at polymer concentration of 10 mg/ml (DSPE-PEG concentration = 40%, TFR = 12 ml/min). (n = 3: mean ± SD)
Fig. 3Nanolipomer formulation parameters. a Effect of PLGA and DSPE-PEG concentration on the size and PDI of nanolipomers. b Nanolipomer stability assay at 4 °C over 1 week. c Effect of initial curcumin concentration on size and PDI. d Curcumin encapsulation efficiency and drug loading at various initial concentrations of curcumin. (n = 3: mean ± SD)
Fig. 4Fluorescence measurements of nanolipomers. a Absorption spectrum of curcumin and nanolipomers after curcumin encapsulation. b Time resolved lifetime measurements of curcumin vs nanolipomers. c Time resolved anisotropy measurements of curcumin vs nanolipomers
Fig. 5In vitro functional assessment of nanolipomers. a–c. C4-2B prostate cancer cell uptake experiment at 1 and 24 h. d Cell viability of C4-2B cells after 48 h of treatment. e Cell viability of C4-2B cells after 72 h of treatment (n = 3: mean ± SD)
Fig. 6In vivo nanolipomer retention assay. a Live animal imaging at various time points after tail vein injection of fluorescently labeled nanolipomer. b Quantification of fluorescent signal at various time points. (n = 3: mean ± SD)
NLP production estimate
| Polymer concentration (mg/ml) | 10 mg/ml | 10 mg/ml | 10 mg/ml |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total flow rate (ml/min) | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| Production rate (g/day) | 2.4 | 7.2 | 14.4 |