| Literature DB >> 29432580 |
Yulan Shi1, Xiule Yue2, Lizhe An1,2.
Abstract
ω-3 fatty acid desaturases (FADs) are thought to contribute to plant stress tolerance mainly through linolenic acid (C18:3)-induced membrane stabilization, but a comprehensive analysis of their roles in stress adaptation is lacking. Here, we isolated a microsomal ω-3 FAD gene (CbFAD3) from a cryophyte (Chorispora bungeana) and elucidated its functions in stress tolerance. CbFAD3, exhibiting a high identity to Arabidopsis AtFAD3, was up-regulated by abiotic stresses. Its functionality was verified by heterogonous expression in yeast. Overexpression of CbFAD3 in tobacco constitutively increased C18:3 in both leaves and roots, which maintained the membrane fluidity, and enhanced plant tolerance to cold, drought, and salt stresses. Notably, the constitutively increased C18:3 induced a sustained activation of plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase, thereby, changing the stress-induced Ca2+ signaling. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging system, which was positively correlated with the level of C18:3, was also activated in the transgenic lines. Microarray analysis showed that CbFAD3-overexpressing plants increased the expression of stress-responsive genes, most of which are affected by C18:3, Ca2+, or ROS. Together, CbFAD3 confers tolerance to multiple stresses in tobacco through the C18:3-induced integrated regulation of membrane, Ca2+, ROS, and stress-responsive genes. This is in contrast with previous observations that simply attribute stress tolerance to membrane stabilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29432580 PMCID: PMC6019038 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Sequence analysis of CbFAD3 and ω-3 FADs in various plant species. (A). Amino acid alignment of CbFAD3 and other ω-3 FADs from selected plant species. The sequence were aligned and displayed using Clustal X and DNAman software, respectively. Identical residues is shown on a background of black. The three conserved histidine clusters (H1–H3) are overlined, and the four transmembrane domains (TMD) are underlined. (B). Phylogenetic tree analysis of CbFAD3 and other FAD family members from selected plant species. Alignments were calculated with Clustal X software, and the analysis was performed using the neighbor-joining method implemented in the MEGA package. Poisson correction was used for multiple substitutions, and the bootstrap value was 1000 replicates. The position of CbFAD3 is indicated by an asterisk.
Fig. 2.qPCR analysis for the expression of CbFAD3 in C. bungeana. (A) Expression of CbFAD3 in different tissues. The cDNAs for analysis were prepared from the regenerated plants and the cultured cells of C. bungeana. Data were calibrated relative to the gene expression level in leaves, which was set at a value of 1. (B) Expression of CbFAD3 is induced by cold, drought, and salt stresses. The suspension-cultured C. bungeana cells were exposed to 0 °C, or treated with 15% PEG or 200 mM NaCl. The cDNAs were prepared from the cultured cells at various treatment times (3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h). Data were calibrated relative to the gene expression level before treatment (0 h), which was set at a value of 1. CbACT was used as the internal control. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates for each experiment. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Fig. 3.Heterogonous expression of CbFAD3 in S. cerevisiae. (A) SDS-PAGE of total proteins in transgenic yeast cells grown at 20 °C. The data were measured after the induction of 2% galactose for 3 d. (B) Gas chromatogram of total fatty acids in transgenic yeast cells grown at 20 °C. The data were measured after the induction of 2% galactose, 50 µM C18:2, and 0.1% NP-40 for 3 d. Yeast cells transformed with pYES2.0 and pYES2.0-CbFAD3 are represented as (1) and (2), respectively.
Fig. 4.CbFAD3-overexpressing tobacco plants showed enhanced tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses. (A, B) Germination of transgenic and WT tobacco seeds under different treatments. Photographs were taken 24 d after low-temperature exposure and 14 d after seeding on PEG or NaCl plates. Germination rates were observed at 2-d intervals up to 30 d after treatment (n=100 seeds for each line from five individual plates). (C–E) Survival of transgenic and WT tobacco plants under cold, drought, and salt stresses. Plants were transferred into soil after plate germination (MS medium), and irrigated with water every 2 d. Four-week-old tobacco plants were exposed to −2 °C for 3 d, not watered for 10 d, or irrigated with 300 mM NaCl solution at 3-d intervals up to 21 d and photographed. Survival rates were measured after 10-d recovery growth under normal conditions (n=90 plants for each line from five individual flower pots). Transgenic lines L2, L3, and L4 were used in these experiments. Values are means ±SE from five independent trials. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Fig. 5.Physiological comparisons between CbFAD3-transgenic and WT tobacco leaves under stress conditions. (A) Electrolyte leakage, reflecting the integrity of the cellular membranes. (B) MDA content, showing the state of lipid peroxidation. (C) Fv/Fm ratio, representing the photosynthetic efficiency. Transgenic lines L2, L3, and L4 were used in these experiments, and for each line more than five plants were used in every experiment. Four-week-old tobacco plants were exposed to 0 °C, not watered, or treated with 200 mM NaCl for 3 d, and then measured. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates for each experiment. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Fig. 6.Changes in fatty acid composition, enzyme activity and membrane fluidity between CbFAD3-transgenic and WT tobacco plants after a 10-d drought treatment. (A) Fatty acid composition of leaves and roots. Data are expressed as molar percentages obtained from the quantitative analysis of peak area chromatogram. (B) Unsaturation indices calculated from fatty acid composition. Double bond index, DBI=[(%18:1)+2(%18:2)+3(%18:3)]/100. (C) Fluidity of plasma membrane from leaves and roots. Data are represented as fluorescence polarization (P). (D) Activity of PM Ca2+-ATPase from leaves and roots. (E) Activity of PM H+-ATPase from leaves and roots. Transgenic lines L2 and L3 were used in these experiments, and each line was used with more than twenty 4-week-old plants in every experiment. Data from leaves and roots are represented as L and R, respectively. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates for each experiment. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Pearson correlation coefficients (two-tailed) between membrane unsaturation indices and physiological indices in leaves (L) or roots (R) before and after drought stress
| C18:3 | C18:3/C18:2 | DBI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EL (L) | 0.26 | −0.19 | 0.33 |
| MDA (L) | 0.25 | −0.23 | 0.34 |
|
| −0.11 | 0.37 | −0.14 |
| MF (L) | −0.18 | −0.33 | 0.04 |
| MF (R) | −0.11 | −0.18 | 0.14 |
| Ca2+-ATPase (L) |
|
|
|
| Ca2+-ATPase (R) |
|
|
|
| H+-ATPase (L) | −0.42 | 0.10 | −0.43 |
| H+-ATPase (R) | −0.31 | −0.29 | −0.30 |
| SOD (L) |
| 0.37 |
|
| CAT (L) |
| −0.01 |
|
| POD (L) | 0.45 | −0.05 |
|
| H2O2 (L) | 0.28 | −0.19 | 0.36 |
The data from CbFAD3-transgenic (L2 and L3) and WT tobacco plants were used for the calculation (three replications, n=12 × 3). Significant positive correlation (R≥0.50, P<0.05) is indicated in bold. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Fig. 7.Dynamics of Ca2+ fluxes and [Ca2+]cyt in CbFAD3-transgenic and WT tobacco plants under different treatments. (A, C) Ca2+ fluxes in root tips treated with 15% PEG or 200 mM NaCl (n=10 ten-day-old seedling roots). Values are means ±SE from 10 independent trials. The inset photomicrograph showed that the detection site was in the elongation zone epidermis of root tips. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B, D) [Ca2+]cyt in root epidermis protoplasts treated with 15% PEG or 200 mM NaCl (n=30 root protoplasts). The root protoplasts were prepared from more than 100 ten-day-old seedlings for each line. The value is presented as the relative fluorescence ratio of Ft/F0. Values are means ±SE of 30 independent biological trials. The inset photomicrograph showed that the Ca2+ level was detected from the cytoplasm of intact root protoplast. Scale bar: 100 µm. The transgenic lines L2 and L3 were used in these experiments. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Fig. 8.Antioxidant response to abiotic stresses in CbFAD3-transgenic and WT tobacco leaves. (A–C) Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD), respectively. (D) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content. Transgenic lines L2, L3, and L4 were used in these experiments, and for each line more than five plants were used in every experiment. Four-week-old tobacco plants were exposed to 0 °C, not watered, or treated with 200 mM NaCl for 24 h, and then measured. Values are means ±SE of three biological replicates for each experiment. Statistical significance between samples, determined by Student’s t-test, is indicated by different letters.
Transcripts significantly increased in CbFAD3-overexpressing tobacco seedlings compared with those of WT controls under salt stress conditions
| Number | Probe name | Accession no. | Gene annotation | Fold (log2) | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A_95_P204097 | EH618725 | Cytochrome | 15.02 | Chilling and salt tolerance |
|
| 2 | A_95_P267086 | FG169445 | Monocopper oxidase-like protein | 14.00 | Plant growth (i.e. cell wall expansion) |
|
| 3 | A_95_P117392 | DV160317 | Disease resistance protein RGA2 | 12.64 | Defense against pathogen attack |
|
| 4 | A_95_P238494 | FG167609 | Asparagine synthetase | 12.55 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 5 | A_95_P113687 | CV021257 | Caffeoyl-CoA | 11.31 | Response to salt and water deficit stresses |
|
| 6 | A_95_P268896 | DW003469 | YLS2-like protein | 11.26 | Response to salt stress |
|
| 7 | A_95_P254509 | EB438355 | Histidine kinase | 10.89 | Plant growth and stress responses |
|
| 8 | A_95_P016001 | EB678560 | Non-specific lipid-transfer protein | 10.75 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 9 | A_95_P281518 | FG645498 | Chromatin-remodeling complex-like | 10.30 | Response to drought, cold and salt stresses |
|
| 10 | A_95_P035683 | BP128538 | Zinc finger protein | 9.88 | Plant growth and stress responses |
|
| 11 | A_95_P234479 | FG170626 | Methyltransferase-like protein | 9.03 | Response to abiotic/biotic stresses |
|
| 12 | A_95_P054511 | BP133457 | Cytochrome P450 -like | 5.68 | Plant development and abiotic stress tolerance |
|
| 13 | A_95_P084005 | BP528907 | MYB transcription factor | 5.48 | Plant growth, development and stress response |
|
| 14 | A_95_P134852 | EB437708 | SNF1-related protein kinase | 4.31 | Response to salt and drought stresses |
|
| 15 | A_95_P006516 | EH616694 | Glycine-rich cell wall structural protein | 3.70 | Salt tolerance and response to pathogen attack |
|
| 16 | A_95_P170234 | EH664856 | APS reductase-like protein | 3.58 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 17 | A_95_P259371 | FG171287 | APS reductase-like protein | 3.57 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 18 | A_95_P316268 | AY772945 | Pectin methylesterase | 3.45 | Cell wall architecture and response to chilling stress |
|
| 19 | A_95_P099313 | BP534878 | Methyltransferase-like protein | 3.33 | Response to abiotic/biotic stresses |
|
| 20 | A_95_P047176 | BP131588 | Ycf3 protein | 3.14 | PSI assembly and drought tolerance |
|
| 21 | A_95_P037263 | BP128958 | GST-like protein | 3.06 | Plant development and abiotic stress tolerance |
|
| 22 | A_95_P000116 | FG157904 | APS reductase-like protein | 2.98 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 23 | A_95_P192712 | EB432744 | Calcium-binding protein | 2.91 | Response to environmental stresses |
|
| 24 | A_95_P173162 | EH665543 | Aspartate aminotransferase | 2.81 | Nitrogen metabolism and synthesis of amino acids |
|
| 25 | A_95_P221852 | DV158128 | Blue copper protein | 2.68 | Plant development and response to salinity and heavy metal stress |
|
| 26 | A_95_P173657 | EH665660 | Leucine-rich receptor-like kinase | 2.56 | Protein phosphorylation |
|
| 27 | A_95_P083300 | BP528727 | Ycf2 protein | 2.54 | PSI assembly and drought tolerance |
|
| 28 | A_95_P078860 | BP527625 | Receptor-like protein kinase | 2.52 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 29 | A_95_P128347 | EB428011 | Pectate lyase | 2.52 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 30 | A_95_P122212 | DW002241 | Golgin subfamily protein | 2.51 | Golgi formation and membrane trafficking |
|
| 31 | A_95_P034973 | BJ999201 | RNA-binding protein | 2.51 | Tolerance to salt and drought stress |
|
| 32 | A_95_P297413 | FG152847 | ICR1-like protein | 2.51 | Plant growth |
|
| 33 | A_95_P035398 | BP128462 | Maturase K gene | 2.46 | Splicing of chloroplast group II introns |
|
| 34 | A_95_P157547 | EH615593 | Reticuline oxidase-like protein | 2.41 | Cell wall architecture and response to pathogen attack |
|
| 35 | A_95_P159832 | EH618298 | CCR-like protein | 2.40 | Abiotic stress tolerance |
|
| 36 | A_95_P190577 | EH615701 | LHT1-like protein | 2.38 | Ethylene responses |
|
| 37 | A_95_P005336 | BP130308 | Pectin methylesterase inhibitor | 2.36 | Anti-fungal activity disease resistance and stress tolerance |
|
| 38 | A_95_P053311 | EB425896 | Sulphur deficiency-induced protein | 2.28 | Utilization of stored sulfate |
|
| 39 | A_95_P018051 | DV160720 | SOD | 2.27 | Plant development and abiotic stress tolerance |
|
| 40 | A_95_P186302 | EB436456 | APS reductase-like protein | 2.26 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 41 | A_95_P183277 | DW001571 | Putrescine | 2.26 | Biosynthesis of alkaloid and wound response |
|
| 42 | A_95_P155202 | FG191506 | Transcription initiation factor | 2.26 | Plant growth, development and abiotic stress tolerance |
|
| 43 | A_95_P134087 | EB435916 | APS reductase-like protein | 2.23 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 44 | A_95_P145077 | EB448622 | TRB-like protein | 2.22 | Telomere formation |
|
| 45 | A_95_P164817 | EH624155 | Receptor-like protein kinase | 2.22 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 46 | A_95_P130417 | EB430467 | PPR-containing protein | 2.19 | Recovery of fertility |
|
| 47 | A_95_P284013 | FG139134 | Receptor-like protein kinase | 2.19 | Response to abiotic stresses |
|
| 48 | A_95_P258921 | X06134 | Nitrate reductase | 2.19 | Stress tolerance and plant growth |
|
| 49 | A_95_P131462 | FG191106 | PPIase-like protein | 2.18 | Salt stress response |
|
| 50 | A_95_P023626 | AW032686 | Chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase | 2.17 | Photosynthesis and growth under cold stress |
|
| 51 | A_95_P058111 | BP134390 | PPR-containing protein | 2.15 | Recovery of fertility |
|
| 52 | A_95_P107022 | CV018176 | Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter | 2.15 | Plant growth, development and salt stress response |
|
| 53 | A_95_P136752 | EB680256 | Granule-bound starch synthase | 2.14 | Amylose synthesis |
|
| 54 | A_95_P221202 | BP128310 | GDSL esterase/lipase | 2.12 | Lipid metabolism, plant development, biotic and abiotic stress responses |
|
| 55 | A_95_P248432 | AM794263 | Chloroplast ribosomal protein | 2.09 | Abiotic stress resistance |
|
| 56 | A_95_P121002 | DW000972 | Glycine dehydrogenase | 2.09 | Photosynthesis and plant growth |
|
| 57 | A_95_P249287 | AF149251 | Secretory peroxidase | 2.08 | Membrane protective function |
|
| 58 | A_95_P134072 | HO663864 | APS reductase-like protein | 2.08 | Plant development and cold stress response |
|
| 59 | A_95_P161877 | EH620463 | UCH-like protein | 2.08 | Ubiquitin recycling and protein regulation |
|
| 60 | A_95_P282903 | AM847814 | Tropinone reductase homolog | 2.03 | Biosynthesis of alkaloid |
|
| 61 | A_95_P315843 | FG189231 | Cyclin | 2.01 | Drought stress response |
|
The WT and transgenic tobacco plants were grown in the greenhouse for 2 weeks and treated with 200 mM NaCl for 6 h; total RNA was extracted from seedlings to perform gene expression profiling by microarray analysis. Transcripts exhibiting more than 2-fold increase in CbFAD3-overexpressing seedlings compared with those of WT controls were considered to show significant changes. Values are means from three independent trials for transgenic and WT plants.
Fig. 9.Hypothetical model for the role of CbFAD3 in plant stress adaptation. Abiotic stress causes an increase in [Ca2+]cyt and ROS. Overexpression of CbFAD3 constitutively increases the level of C18:3, which maintains membrane fluidity, and alters the stress-induced Ca2+ signaling through sustainably activating PM Ca2+-ATPase. The constitutively increased C18:3 along with the changed [Ca2+]cyt also switches off ROS production by activating the antioxidant defense system, and then increases the expression of various stress-responsive genes, resulting in stress responses. Overall, the CbFAD3-triggered integrated regulation of membrane, Ca2+, ROS, and stress-responsive genes contributes to plant multiple-stress tolerance.