Literature DB >> 29432181

Three classes of recurrent DNA break clusters in brain progenitors identified by 3D proximity-based break joining assay.

Pei-Chi Wei1,2,3, Cheng-Sheng Lee1,2,3, Zhou Du1,2,3, Bjoern Schwer1,2,3, Yuxiang Zhang1,2,3, Jennifer Kao1,2,3, Jeffrey Zurita1,2,3, Frederick W Alt4,2,3.   

Abstract

We recently discovered 27 recurrent DNA double-strand break (DSB) clusters (RDCs) in mouse neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs). Most RDCs occurred across long, late-replicating RDC genes and were found only after mild inhibition of DNA replication. RDC genes share intriguing characteristics, including encoding surface proteins that organize brain architecture and neuronal junctions, and are genetically implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders and/or cancers. RDC identification relies on high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS), which maps recurrent DSBs based on their translocation to "bait" DSBs in specific chromosomal locations. Cellular heterogeneity in 3D genome organization allowed unequivocal identification of RDCs on 14 different chromosomes using HTGTS baits on three mouse chromosomes. Additional candidate RDCs were also implicated, however, suggesting that some RDCs were missed. To more completely identify RDCs, we exploited our finding that joining of two DSBs occurs more frequently if they lie on the same cis chromosome. Thus, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to introduce specific DSBs into each mouse chromosome in NSPCs that were used as bait for HTGTS libraries. This analysis confirmed all 27 previously identified RDCs and identified many new ones. NSPC RDCs fall into three groups based on length, organization, transcription level, and replication timing of genes within them. While mostly less robust, the largest group of newly defined RDCs share many intriguing characteristics with the original 27. Our findings also revealed RDCs in NSPCs in the absence of induced replication stress, and support the idea that the latter treatment augments an already active endogenous process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neural stem cells; neurodevelopment; nonhomologous end-joining; recurrent DNA break clusters; replication stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29432181      PMCID: PMC5828622          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719907115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Transcription-associated processes cause DNA double-strand breaks and translocations in neural stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Bjoern Schwer; Pei-Chi Wei; Amelia N Chang; Jennifer Kao; Zhou Du; Robin M Meyers; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cartography of neurexin alternative splicing mapped by single-molecule long-read mRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Barbara Treutlein; Ozgun Gokce; Stephen R Quake; Thomas C Südhof
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Targeted combinatorial alternative splicing generates brain region-specific repertoires of neurexins.

Authors:  Dietmar Schreiner; Thi-Minh Nguyen; Giancarlo Russo; Steffen Heber; Andrea Patrignani; Erik Ahrné; Peter Scheiffele
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Somatic mutation, genomic variation, and neurological disease.

Authors:  Annapurna Poduri; Gilad D Evrony; Xuyu Cai; Christopher A Walsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Y Gao; Y Sun; K M Frank; P Dikkes; Y Fujiwara; K J Seidl; J M Sekiguchi; G A Rathbun; W Swat; J Wang; R T Bronson; B A Malynn; M Bryans; C Zhu; J Chaudhuri; L Davidson; R Ferrini; T Stamato; S H Orkin; M E Greenberg; F W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells.

Authors:  Roberto Chiarle; Yu Zhang; Richard L Frock; Susanna M Lewis; Benoit Molinie; Yu-Jui Ho; Darienne R Myers; Vivian W Choi; Mara Compagno; Daniel J Malkin; Donna Neuberg; Stefano Monti; Cosmas C Giallourakis; Monica Gostissa; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress.

Authors:  Thomas E Wilson; Martin F Arlt; So Hae Park; Sountharia Rajendran; Michelle Paulsen; Mats Ljungman; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Orientation-specific joining of AID-initiated DNA breaks promotes antibody class switching.

Authors:  Junchao Dong; Rohit A Panchakshari; Tingting Zhang; Yu Zhang; Jiazhi Hu; Sabrina A Volpi; Robin M Meyers; Yu-Jui Ho; Zhou Du; Davide F Robbiani; Feilong Meng; Monica Gostissa; Michel C Nussenzweig; John P Manis; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Detecting DNA double-stranded breaks in mammalian genomes by linear amplification-mediated high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing.

Authors:  Jiazhi Hu; Robin M Meyers; Junchao Dong; Rohit A Panchakshari; Frederick W Alt; Richard L Frock
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 13.491

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage in aging, the stem cell perspective.

Authors:  Taylor McNeely; Michael Leone; Hagai Yanai; Isabel Beerman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  DNA double-strand breaks as drivers of neural genomic change, function, and disease.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

3.  Induction of recurrent break cluster genes in neural progenitor cells differentiated from embryonic stem cells in culture.

Authors:  Aseda Tena; Yuxiang Zhang; Nia Kyritsis; Anne Devorak; Jeffrey Zurita; Pei-Chi Wei; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heterogeneous interactions and polymer entropy decide organization and dynamics of chromatin domains.

Authors:  Kiran Kumari; J Ravi Prakash; Ranjith Padinhateeri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  An atlas of endogenous DNA double-strand breaks arising during human neural cell fate determination.

Authors:  Roberto Ballarino; Britta A M Bouwman; Federico Agostini; Luuk Harbers; Constantin Diekmann; Erik Wernersson; Magda Bienko; Nicola Crosetto
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 8.501

6.  Genome integrity and neurogenesis of postnatal hippocampal neural stem/progenitor cells require a unique regulator Filia.

Authors:  Jingzheng Li; Yafang Shang; Lin Wang; Bo Zhao; Chunli Sun; Jiali Li; Siling Liu; Cong Li; Min Tang; Fei-Long Meng; Ping Zheng
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Protective Mechanisms Against DNA Replication Stress in the Nervous System.

Authors:  Clara Forrer Charlier; Rodrigo A P Martins
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Increased Neural Progenitor Proliferation in a hiPSC Model of Autism Induces Replication Stress-Associated Genome Instability.

Authors:  Meiyan Wang; Pei-Chi Wei; Christina K Lim; Iryna S Gallina; Sara Marshall; Maria C Marchetto; Frederick W Alt; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 9.  The role of somatic mosaicism in brain disease.

Authors:  Alexandre Jourdon; Liana Fasching; Soraya Scuderi; Alexej Abyzov; Flora M Vaccarino
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 10.  Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: An Ever-Growing Toolbox.

Authors:  Alexandra C Vítor; Pablo Huertas; Gaëlle Legube; Sérgio F de Almeida
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.