Literature DB >> 29428071

Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.

João Otávio Bandeira Diniz1, Pedro Henrique Bandeira Diniz2, Thales Levi Azevedo Valente3, Aristófanes Corrêa Silva4, Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva5, Marcelo Gattass6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The processing of medical image is an important tool to assist in minimizing the degree of uncertainty of the specialist, while providing specialists with an additional source of detect and diagnosis information. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer that affects the female population around the world. It is also the most deadly type of cancer among women. It is the second most common type of cancer among all others. The most common examination to diagnose breast cancer early is mammography. In the last decades, computational techniques have been developed with the purpose of automatically detecting structures that maybe associated with tumors in mammography examination. This work presents a computational methodology to automatically detection of mass regions in mammography by using a convolutional neural network.
METHODS: The materials used in this work is the DDSM database. The method proposed consists of two phases: training phase and test phase. The training phase has 2 main steps: (1) create a model to classify breast tissue into dense and non-dense (2) create a model to classify regions of breast into mass and non-mass. The test phase has 7 step: (1) preprocessing; (2) registration; (3) segmentation; (4) first reduction of false positives; (5) preprocessing of regions segmented; (6) density tissue classification (7) second reduction of false positives where regions will be classified into mass and non-mass.
RESULTS: The proposed method achieved 95.6% of accuracy in classify non-dense breasts tissue and 97,72% accuracy in classify dense breasts. To detect regions of mass in non-dense breast, the method achieved a sensitivity value of 91.5%, and specificity value of 90.7%, with 91% accuracy. To detect regions in dense breasts, our method achieved 90.4% of sensitivity and 96.4% of specificity, with accuracy of 94.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the results achieved by CNN, we demonstrate the feasibility of using convolutional neural networks on medical image processing techniques for classification of breast tissue and mass detection.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral asymmetry; Breast cancer; Computer-aided detection; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Similary indexes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29428071     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  11 in total

1.  Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Increase or Predict the Success Rate of Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Patients With Azoospermia?

Authors:  Heng Xue; Shou-Yang Wang; Li-Gang Cui; Kai Hong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Segmentation of Masses on Mammograms Using Data Augmentation and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Felipe André Zeiser; Cristiano André da Costa; Tiago Zonta; Nuno M C Marques; Adriana Vial Roehe; Marcelo Moreno; Rodrigo da Rosa Righi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on DCE-MRI by Using Radiomics and Deep Learning With Consideration of Peritumor Tissue.

Authors:  Jiejie Zhou; Yang Zhang; Kai-Ting Chang; Kyoung Eun Lee; Ouchen Wang; Jiance Li; Yezhi Lin; Zhifang Pan; Peter Chang; Daniel Chow; Meihao Wang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence and convolution neural networks assessing mammographic images: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Dennis Jay Wong; Ziba Gandomkar; Wan-Jing Wu; Guijing Zhang; Wushuang Gao; Xiaoying He; Yunuo Wang; Warren Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 5.  Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Sensors, Signals, and Imaging Informatics.

Authors:  William Hsu; Christian Baumgartner; Thomas Deserno
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Segmentation and quantification of COVID-19 infections in CT using pulmonary vessels extraction and deep learning.

Authors:  João O B Diniz; Darlan B P Quintanilha; Antonino C Santos Neto; Giovanni L F da Silva; Jonnison L Ferreira; Stelmo M B Netto; José D L Araújo; Luana B Da Cruz; Thamila F B Silva; Caio M da S Martins; Marcos M Ferreira; Venicius G Rego; José M C Boaro; Carolina L S Cipriano; Aristófanes C Silva; Anselmo C de Paiva; Geraldo Braz Junior; João D S de Almeida; Rodolfo A Nunes; Roberto Mogami; M Gattass
Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Automatic method for classifying COVID-19 patients based on chest X-ray images, using deep features and PSO-optimized XGBoost.

Authors:  Domingos Alves Dias Júnior; Luana Batista da Cruz; João Otávio Bandeira Diniz; Giovanni Lucca França da Silva; Geraldo Braz Junior; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Rodolfo Acatauassú Nunes; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.954

8.  Deep Learning strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Pedro H B Diniz; Yi Yin; Sally Collins
Journal:  Eur Med J Reprod Health       Date:  2020-08-25

9.  Deep learning can be used to train naïve, nonprofessional observers to detect diagnostic visual patterns of certain cancers in mammograms: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-04

10.  Automated Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Mammograms of Various Densities via Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yong Joon Suh; Jaewon Jung; Bum-Joo Cho
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.