Literature DB >> 33123376

Deep Learning strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy.

Pedro H B Diniz1, Yi Yin1, Sally Collins1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is one of the most ubiquitous imaging modalities in clinical practice. It is cheap, does not require ionizing radiation and can be performed at the bedside, making it the most commonly utilized imaging technique in pregnancy. Despite these advantages, it does have some drawbacks such as relatively low imaging quality, low contrast, and high variability. With these constraints, automating the interpretation of ultrasound images is challenging. However, successful automated identification of structures within 3D ultrasound volumes has the potential to revolutionize clinical practice. For example, a small placental volume in the first trimester has been shown to be correlated to adverse outcome later in pregnancy. If the placenta could be segmented reliably and automatically from a static 3D ultrasound volume, it would facilitate the use of its estimated volume, and other morphological metrics, as part of a screening test for increased risk of pregnancy complications potentially improving clinical outcomes. Recently, deep learning has emerged, achieving state-of-the-art performance in various research fields, notably medical image analysis involving classification, segmentation, object detection, and tracking tasks. Due to its increased performance with large datasets, it has gained great interest in medical imaging applications. In this review, we present an overview of deep learning methods applied to ultrasound in pregnancy, introducing their architectures and analyzing their strategies. We then present some common problems and provide some perspectives into potential future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep Learning; Morphometry; Pregnancy; Segmentation; Ultrasound Imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 33123376      PMCID: PMC7590498     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Med J Reprod Health        ISSN: 2059-450X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Placenta and fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Carolyn M Salafia; Adrian K Charles; Elizabeth M Maas
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination.

Authors:  L J Salomon; N Winer; J P Bernard; Y Ville
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning.

Authors:  Pádraig Looney; Gordon N Stevenson; Kypros H Nicolaides; Walter Plasencia; Malid Molloholli; Stavros Natsis; Sally L Collins
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  Fully-automated alignment of 3D fetal brain ultrasound to a canonical reference space using multi-task learning.

Authors:  Ana I L Namburete; Weidi Xie; Mohammad Yaqub; Andrew Zisserman; J Alison Noble
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Intervertebral disc detection in X-ray images using faster R-CNN.

Authors:  William Owens; Raymond Wiegand; Mark Studin; Donald Capoferri; Kenneth Barooha; Alexander Greaux; Robert Rattray; Adam Hutton; John Cintineo; Vipin Chaudhary
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2017-07

Review 6.  Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities.

Authors:  Laura J Brattain; Brian A Telfer; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

7.  Standardization of blood flow measurements by automated vascular analysis from power Doppler ultrasound scan.

Authors:  Yi Yin; Pádraig Looney; Sally L Collins
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

Review 8.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Roy A Filly; Joshua A Copel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Weakly Supervised Learning of Placental Ultrasound Images with Residual Networks.

Authors:  Huan Qi; Sally Collins; Alison Noble
Journal:  Med Image Underst Anal Conf (2017)       Date:  2017-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.