Literature DB >> 32206943

Segmentation of Masses on Mammograms Using Data Augmentation and Deep Learning.

Felipe André Zeiser1, Cristiano André da Costa2, Tiago Zonta1,3, Nuno M C Marques4, Adriana Vial Roehe5, Marcelo Moreno6, Rodrigo da Rosa Righi1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of breast cancer in early stage is essential for successful treatment. Detection can be performed in several ways, the most common being through mammograms. The projections acquired by this type of examination are directly affected by the composition of the breast, which density can be similar to the suspicious masses, being a challenge the identification of malignant lesions. In this article, we propose a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to aid in the diagnosis of masses in digitized mammograms using a model based in the U-Net, allowing specialists to monitor the lesion over time. Unlike most of the studies, we propose the use of an entire base of digitized mammograms using normal, benign, and malignant cases. Our research is divided into four stages: (1) pre-processing, with the removal of irrelevant information, enhancement of the contrast of 7989 images of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), and obtaining regions of interest. (2) Data augmentation, with horizontal mirroring, zooming, and resizing of images; (3) training, with tests of six-based U-Net models, with different characteristics; (4) testing, evaluating four metrics, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Dice Index. The tested models obtained different results regarding the assessed parameters. The best model achieved a sensitivity of 92.32%, specificity of 80.47%, accuracy of 85.95% Dice Index of 79.39%, and AUC of 86.40%. Even using a full base without case selection bias, the results obtained demonstrate that the use of a complete database can provide knowledge to the CAD expert.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Computer-aided detection; Deep learning; Fully convolutional network; Segmentation; U-Net

Year:  2020        PMID: 32206943      PMCID: PMC7522129          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00330-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

1.  A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention.

Authors:  Neeraj Dhungel; Gustavo Carneiro; Andrew P Bradley
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  A fully integrated computer-aided diagnosis system for digital X-ray mammograms via deep learning detection, segmentation, and classification.

Authors:  Mugahed A Al-Antari; Mohammed A Al-Masni; Mun-Taek Choi; Seung-Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Computer-aided diagnosis of malignant mammograms using Zernike moments and SVM.

Authors:  Shubhi Sharma; Pritee Khanna
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  João Otávio Bandeira Diniz; Pedro Henrique Bandeira Diniz; Thales Levi Azevedo Valente; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Masni; Mugahed A Al-Antari; Jeong-Min Park; Geon Gi; Tae-Yeon Kim; Patricio Rivera; Edwin Valarezo; Mun-Taek Choi; Seung-Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  C Dromain; B Boyer; R Ferré; S Canale; S Delaloge; C Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Automatic Detection of Masses in Mammograms Using Quality Threshold Clustering, Correlogram Function, and SVM.

Authors:  Joberth de Nazaré Silva; Antonio Oseas de Carvalho Filho; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Image Augmentation Techniques for Mammogram Analysis.

Authors:  Parita Oza; Paawan Sharma; Samir Patel; Festus Adedoyin; Alessandro Bruno
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Machine learning predictive model for severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Jianhong Kang; Ting Chen; Honghe Luo; Yifeng Luo; Guipeng Du; Mia Jiming-Yang
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.393

3.  Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammogram Image Using Multilevel Multiobjective Electromagnetism-Like Optimization Algorithm.

Authors:  S S Ittannavar; R H Havaldar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Image Segmentation under the Optimization Algorithm of Krill Swarm and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Qiang Geng; Huifeng Yan
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 5.  Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials.

Authors:  Epimack Michael; He Ma; Hong Li; Frank Kulwa; Jing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.