Literature DB >> 29427960

Performance and genome-centric metagenomics of thermophilic single and two-stage anaerobic digesters treating cheese wastes.

Alessandra Fontana1, Stefano Campanaro2, Laura Treu3, Panagiotis G Kougias4, Fabrizio Cappa5, Lorenzo Morelli5, Irini Angelidaki3.   

Abstract

The present research is the first comprehensive study regarding the thermophilic anaerobic degradation of cheese wastewater, which combines the evaluation of different reactor configurations (i.e. single and two-stage continuous stirred tank reactors) on the process efficiency and the in-depth characterization of the microbial community structure using genome-centric metagenomics. Both reactor configurations showed acidification problems under the tested organic loading rates (OLRs) of 3.6 and 2.4 g COD/L-reactor day and the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 15 days. However, the two-stage design reached a methane yield equal to 95% of the theoretical value, in contrast with the single stage configuration, which reached a maximum of 33% of the theoretical methane yield. The metagenomic analysis identified 22 new population genomes and revealed that the microbial compositions between the two configurations were remarkably different, demonstrating a higher methanogenic biodiversity in the two-stage configuration. In fact, the acidogenic reactor of the serial configuration was almost solely composed by the lactose degrader Bifidobacterium crudilactis UC0001. The predictive functional analyses of the main population genomes highlighted specific metabolic pathways responsible for the AD process and the mechanisms of main intermediates production. Particularly, the acetate accumulation experienced by the single stage configuration was mainly correlated to the low abundant syntrophic acetate oxidizer Tepidanaerobacter acetatoxydans UC0018 and to the absence of aceticlastic methanogens.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acidogenesis; Dairy wastes; Metagenomics; Methanogens; Syntrophisms; Thermophilic anaerobic digestion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427960     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  8 in total

1.  Carbon migration and metagenomic characteristics during anaerobic digestion of rice straw.

Authors:  Dadi Chen; Xiaoyu Zuo; Juan Li; Xitong Wang; Jie Liu
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 2.  Integrating Systems and Synthetic Biology to Understand and Engineer Microbiomes.

Authors:  Patrick A Leggieri; Yiyi Liu; Madeline Hayes; Bryce Connors; Susanna Seppälä; Michelle A O'Malley; Ophelia S Venturelli
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Characterisation and microbial community analysis of lipid utilising microorganisms for biogas formation.

Authors:  Alexis Nzila; Shaikh Abdur Razzak; Saravanan Sankara; Mazen K Nazal; Marwan Al-Momani; Gi-Ung Kang; Jerald Conrad Ibal; Jae-Ho Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  New insights from the biogas microbiome by comprehensive genome-resolved metagenomics of nearly 1600 species originating from multiple anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Stefano Campanaro; Laura Treu; Luis M Rodriguez-R; Adam Kovalovszki; Ryan M Ziels; Irena Maus; Xinyu Zhu; Panagiotis G Kougias; Arianna Basile; Gang Luo; Andreas Schlüter; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Identification of key microorganisms in facultative stabilization ponds from dairy industries, using metagenomics.

Authors:  Jose M Irazoqui; Maria F Eberhardt; Maria M Adjad; Ariel F Amadio
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Analysis of the anaerobic digestion metagenome under environmental stresses stimulating prophage induction.

Authors:  Alessandro Rossi; Maria Silvia Morlino; Maria Gaspari; Arianna Basile; Panagiotis Kougias; Laura Treu; Stefano Campanaro
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 16.837

Review 7.  Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production.

Authors:  Seyedbehnam Hashemi; Sayed Ebrahim Hashemi; Kristian M Lien; Jacob J Lamb
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-28

8.  Microbial activity response to hydrogen injection in thermophilic anaerobic digesters revealed by genome-centric metatranscriptomics.

Authors:  Alessandra Fontana; Panagiotis G Kougias; Laura Treu; Adam Kovalovszki; Giorgio Valle; Fabrizio Cappa; Lorenzo Morelli; Irini Angelidaki; Stefano Campanaro
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 14.650

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.