| Literature DB >> 32699553 |
Dadi Chen1,2, Xiaoyu Zuo1, Juan Li1,3, Xitong Wang1, Jie Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considerable interest has been expressed in the development of anaerobic digestion (AD) of straw to solve the environmental problems caused by the dumping and burning of straw and to generate clean energy. However, the poor biodegradability of straw and the low efficiency of energy generation achieved during its AD are problematic. Studying the parameter changes involved in the process of AD is helpful for clarifying its micro-mechanisms and providing a theoretical basis for improving its efficiency. Currently, most research into process parameters has focused on gas production, methane content, pH, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) content; limited research has focused on carbon migration and functional gene changes during the AD of straw.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Metabolic pathway; Metagenome; Methane metabolism; Process parameter; Straw
Year: 2020 PMID: 32699553 PMCID: PMC7372879 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01770-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Daily and cumulative biogas production and methane content of rice straw during anaerobic digestion. aThe highlighted section indicates that the methane content had reached a stable state. bThe three stages of the anaerobic digestion process are indicated by vertical dotted lines
Fig. 2The distribution of carbon in the solid, liquid, and gas phases (a) and the distribution of carbon in the gas phase (b) during the anaerobic digestion of rice straw
Fig. 3Simulation results of the degree of hydrolysis and the degree of gasification using a first-order kinetics model, a Cone model, and a modified Gompertz model
Parameters estimated by a first-order kinetic model, a modified Gompertz model, and a Cone model
| Degree of anaerobic digestion | Model | Parameter | Accuracy of the model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSPEa/g | AICb | ||||||||
| Degree of hydrolysis | First-order kinetic | 46.8 | – | 0.21 | – | – | 0.9364 | 36.24 | 46.01 |
| modified Gompertz | 45.67 | 21.99 | – | 0.17 | – | 0.9128 | 36.57 | 48.48 | |
| Cone | 53.49 | – | 0.26 | – | 0.97 | 0.9605 | 9.93 | 34.14 | |
| Degree of gasification | First-order kinetic | 58.67 | 0.04 | – | – | 0.9947 | 31.83 | 44.58 | |
| modified Gompertz | 49.54 | 4.50 | – | 0.46 | – | 0.9891 | 35.73 | 48.22 | |
| Cone | 71.56 | – | 0.04 | – | 1.18 | 0.9934 | 4.35 | 25.07 | |
aRoot mean square prediction error
bAkaike information criterion
Fig. 4Composition of the pathways on level 1 and level 2 (a), modules (b), and archaea (c)
Fig. 5KOs with high abundance in ko00680
Biochemical reactions corresponding to the names of the reactions
| Name | Reaction |
|---|---|
| R00235 | ATP + acetate + CoA ⟺⟺ AMP + diphosphate + acetyl-CoA |
| R00351 | Citrate + CoA ⟺ Acetyl-CoA + H2O + oxaloacetate |
| R00230 | Acetyl-CoA + orthophosphate ⟺ CoA + acetyl phosphate |
| R09096 | Acetyl-CoA + 5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin ⟺ CoA + 5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin + CO |
| R01196 | 2 Reduced ferredoxin + acetyl-CoA + CO2 + 2H + ⟺ 2 oxidized ferredoxin + Pyruvate + CoA |
| R00199 | ATP + pyruvate + H2O ⟺ AMP + Phosphoenolpyruvate + orthophosphate |
| R00658 | 2-Phospho- |
| R01518 | 2-Phospho- |
| R01513 | 3-Phospho- |
| R04173 | O-Phospho- |
| R00582 | O-Phospho- |
| R09099 | |
| R04464 | 5,10-Methylenetetrahydromethanopterin + reduced coenzyme F420 ⟺ 5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin + coenzyme F420 |
| R04347 | 5-Methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin + coenzyme M + 2 sodium cation(in) ⟺ 5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin + 2-(Methylthio)ethanesulfonate + 2 sodium cations (out) |
Enzyme abundance associated with the formation or degradation of acetic acid, propionic acid and butyrate
| Enzyme | A1 | A5 | A10 | A15 | A20 | A25 | A50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetic acid | 31 | 2251.83 | 2475.83 | 2278.51 | 2450.26 | 2429.41 | 2489.79 | 2615.49 |
| Acetic acid as substrate | 11 | 808.16 | 837.49 | 854.72 | 951.58 | 1020.45 | 661.37 | 1230.52 |
| Acetic acid as product | 20 | 1443.67 | 1638.34 | 1423.79 | 1498.68 | 1408.97 | 1828.42 | 1384.97 |
| Propionic acid | 7 | 1334.17 | 1215.60 | 1343.20 | 1146.57 | 1324.50 | 1312.35 | 1527.32 |
| Butyrate | 5 | 1080.15 | 780.09 | 698.41 | 751.48 | 735.21 | 917.98 | 558.77 |
Fig. 6Principal component analysis (PCA) of the microbial community (a), PCA of the KEGG functions (b), and ipath analysis (c)
Specific characteristics of the raw material (rice straw) and the inoculum
| Index | Rice straw | Inoculum |
|---|---|---|
| Total solids (TS)a (%) | 93.70 | 11.59 |
| Volatile solids (VS)a (%) | 80.82 | 7.61 |
| Total carbon (TC)b (%) | 38.14 | 35.15 |
| Total nitrogen (TN)b (%) | 0.51 | 2.56 |
| C/N | 74.78 | 13.75 |
| Celluloseb (%) | 40.44 | ND |
| Hemicelluloseb (%) | 29.27 | ND |
| Ligninb (%) | 5.17 | ND |
aContent of fresh matter
bContent of dry matter