Literature DB >> 29427846

Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair.

Hua Xue1, Kelong Lu1, Ning Hao2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate which type of group (e.g., consisting of less-creative or highly-creative individuals) would perform better in solving creativity problems, and explore the underlying inter-brain neural correlates between team members. A preliminary test (an alternative-uses task) was performed to rank individuals' level of creativity, and divide participants into three types of dyads: high-high (two highly-creative individuals), low-low (two less-creative individuals), and high-low (one highly-creative and one less-creative individual). Dyads were then asked to solve a realistic presented problem (RPP; a typical creativity problem) during which a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based hyperscanning device was used to record the variation of interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS). Results revealed that less-creative individuals, while working together, would perform as well as highly-creative individuals. The low-low dyads showed higher levels of cooperation behaviour than the other two types of dyads. The fNIRS results revealed increased IBS only for low-low dyads at PFC (prefrontal cortex) and rTPJ (right temporal-parietal junction) brain regions during RPP task performance. In the rDLPFC (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), the IBS in the low-low dyads was stronger than that of high-high and high-low dyads. In the rTPJ, the IBS in the low-low dyads was only stronger than that of the high-low dyads. Besides, the IBS at rDLPFC and rTPJ regions in the low-low dyads was positively correlated with their cooperation behaviour and group creative performance. These findings indicated when two less-creative individuals worked on a creativity problem together, they tended to cooperate with each other (indicated by both behaviour index and increased IBS at rDLPFC and rTPJ), which benefited their creative performance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brainstorming; Creativity; Hyperscanning; Interpersonal brain synchronization; fNIRS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427846     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  22 in total

Review 1.  Concurrent mapping of brain activation from multiple subjects during social interaction by hyperscanning: a mini-review.

Authors:  Meng-Yun Wang; Ping Luan; Juan Zhang; Yu-Tao Xiang; Haijing Niu; Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-09

2.  Wavelet-based method for removing global physiological noise in functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lian Duan; Ziping Zhao; Yongling Lin; Xiaoyan Wu; Yuejia Luo; Pengfei Xu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Measurement of interpersonal physiological synchrony in dyads: A review of timing parameters used in the literature.

Authors:  Analia Marzoratti; Tanya M Evans
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Inter-brain neural mechanism underlying turn-based interaction under acute stress in women: a hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hanxuan Zhao; Yadan Li; Xuewei Wang; Yuecui Kan; Sihua Xu; Haijun Duan
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.235

5.  Creativity slumps and bumps: Examining the neurobehavioral basis of creativity development during middle childhood.

Authors:  Manish Saggar; Hua Xie; Roger E Beaty; Atanas D Stankov; Meredith Schreier; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A cross-brain neural mechanism for human-to-human verbal communication.

Authors:  Joy Hirsch; J Adam Noah; Xian Zhang; Swethasri Dravida; Yumie Ono
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  When do we fall in neural synchrony with others?

Authors:  Kelong Lu; Ning Hao
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Self-other overlap and interpersonal neural synchronization serially mediate the effect of behavioral synchronization on prosociality.

Authors:  Xiaodan Feng; Binghai Sun; Chuansheng Chen; Weijian Li; Ying Wang; Wenhai Zhang; Weilong Xiao; Yuting Shao
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Interactive Brain Activity: Review and Progress on EEG-Based Hyperscanning in Social Interactions.

Authors:  Difei Liu; Shen Liu; Xiaoming Liu; Chong Zhang; Aosika Li; Chenggong Jin; Yijun Chen; Hangwei Wang; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-08

10.  Optimization of wavelet coherence analysis as a measure of neural synchrony during hyperscanning using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; J Adam Noah; Swethasri Dravida; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.