Literature DB >> 35556231

Measurement of interpersonal physiological synchrony in dyads: A review of timing parameters used in the literature.

Analia Marzoratti1, Tanya M Evans2.   

Abstract

When individuals share interpersonal connections, such as the bond between a mother and child or between a therapist and their client, they often exhibit measurable coordination of some physiological response patterns during their interactions known as interpersonal physiological synchrony (IPS Butler, 2011; Palumbo et al., 2016; Tscacher & Meier, 2019). However, as there is no single definition of IPS in the literature, researchers across fields have not established a standardized method for its study. This paper outlines methodological considerations that researchers should take into account when designing studies of IPS. Due to the inherent temporal component of synchrony analyses, we direct particular focus to the issue of measurement timing. Synchrony is described across multiple physiological processes, including electrodermal skin activation, cardiac function, respiration, and neural oscillatory activity, and we make specific recommendations for each. Across physiological measures and analytic strategies, we recommend that when determining an experimental timeframe in which to isolate periods of dyadic IPS, researchers should account for the timing of both the biological systems of interest and the psychological processes theorized to underlie their activity in that particular context. In adopting this strategy, researchers can ensure that they capture all of the fluctuations associated with a psychological process of interest and can add to the growing body of literature examining physiological correlates of interpersonal bonds.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic response; Empathy; Interpersonal bonds; Interpersonal physiological synchrony; Neural oscillations; Research methodology; Temporal analysis; Timing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35556231     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01011-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  52 in total

1.  A Method for Modeling the Intrinsic Dynamics of Intraindividual Variability: Recovering the Parameters of Simulated Oscillators in Multi-Wave Panel Data.

Authors:  Steven M Boker; John R Nesselroade
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the "TIES" that form relationships.

Authors:  Emily A Butler
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-06-21

3.  Social hierarchies and emotions: cortical prefrontal activity, facial feedback (EMG), and cognitive performance in a dynamic interaction.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Silvia Pagani
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 4.  Model-based analysis of skin conductance responses: Towards causal models in psychophysiology.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour.

Authors:  Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in social decision-making.

Authors:  Florian Bitsch; Philipp Berger; Arne Nagels; Irina Falkenberg; Benjamin Straube
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Social Relationships and Health: The Toxic Effects of Perceived Social Isolation.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; Stephanie Cacioppo
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 8.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

Authors:  R F Baumeister; M R Leary
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function.

Authors:  Florian Beissner; Karin Meissner; Karl-Jürgen Bär; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Flow of affective information between communicating brains.

Authors:  Silke Anders; Jakob Heinzle; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Thomas Ethofer; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.