| Literature DB >> 29426277 |
Shuang Tian1,2, Yixuan Kou1, Zhirong Zhang3, Lin Yuan1, Derong Li1, Jordi López-Pujol4, Dengmei Fan5, Zhiyong Zhang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mountains have not only provided refuge for species, but also offered dispersal corridors during the Neogene and Quaternary global climate changes. Compared with a plethora of studies on the refuge role of China's mountain ranges, their dispersal corridor role has received little attention in plant phylogeographic studies. Using phylogeographic data of Eomecon chionantha Hance (Papaveraceae), this study explicitly tested whether the Nanling Mountains, which spans from west to east for more than 1000 km in subtropical China, could have functioned as a dispersal corridor during the late Quaternary in addition to a glacial refugium.Entities:
Keywords: Chloroplast intergenic spacer; Dispersal corridor; Eomecon chionantha Hance; Microsatellite; Phylogeographic structure; Ribosomal internal transcribed spacer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29426277 PMCID: PMC5807764 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1093-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1a Distribution of chloroplast haplotypes of Eomecon chionantha. b The network of 15 chloroplast haplotypes. c The distribution of Eomecon chionantha in China, the Nanling mountains is indicated with dark red color
Sample location, sample size, and genetic variation of 38 populations of Eomecon chionantha
| Province | Location | Code | Lat. | Long. | Alt. |
| cp | ITS | nSSRs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Gansu | Wenxian | 1 | 32.7142 | 105.2310 | 860 | 9/7/9 | 0.2222 | 0.4762 | 3.50 | 0.593 | 0.500 | 0.213 |
| Yunnan | Wenshan | 2 | 23.3789 | 103.9597 | 2049 | 10/13/15 | 0.3556 | 0.7821 | 2.48 | 0.396 | 0.522 | −0.289 |
| Chong | Jinfoshan | 3 | 29.0529 | 107.1999 | 1253 | 9/3/14 | 0 | 0 | 2.33 | 0.412 | 0.510 | −0.201 |
| Jinfoshan | 4 | 28.9917 | 107.0978 | 1388 | 3/0/3 | 0 | – | 1.17 | 0.083 | 0.167 | −1.000 | |
| Chongqing | 5 | 29.5300 | 108.7700 | 456 | 4/1/10 | 0 | – | 5.83 | 0.689 | 0.666 | 0.092 | |
| Guizhou | Xishui | 6 | 28.5374 | 106.3943 | 1021 | 10/0/15 | 0 | – | 2.00 | 0.500 | 0.989 | −0.978 |
| Suiyang | 7 | 28.2842 | 107.1716 | 1540 | 10/9/15 | 0 | 0 | 4.99 | 0.580 | 0.600 | 0 | |
| Leigongshan | 8 | 26.3703 | 108.1953 | 1464 | 14/13/12 | 0 | 0.6667 | 6.50 | 0.746 | 0.875 | −0.131 | |
| Fanjingshan | 9 | 27.9153 | 108.6358 | 1323 | 12/6/15 | 0.1667 | 0 | 8.24 | 0.805 | 0.818 | 0.019 | |
| Hubei | Xingdoushan | 10 | 30.0256 | 109.1020 | 828 | 9/0/15 | 0 | – | 5.64 | 0.690 | 0.611 | 0.148 |
| Guangxi | Lingui | 11 | 25.5356 | 110.0884 | 321 | 9/18/12 | 0 | 0.5294 | 3.00 | 0.485 | 0.558 | −0.106 |
| Hunan | Suining | 12 | 26.3835 | 110.0971 | 882 | 10/10/12 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.613 | 0.447 | 0.311 |
| Huitong | 13 | 26.6144 | 109.8807 | 564 | 10/18/15 | 0 | 0.5294 | 2.16 | 0.510 | 0.989 | −0.935 | |
| Guzhang | 14 | 28.6600 | 110.0824 | 1390 | 10/12/15 | 0.2000 | 0.3030 | 7.11 | 0.784 | 0.742 | 0.090 | |
| Xiaoxi | 15 | 28.8675 | 110.2579 | 660 | 10/7/14 | 0.5556 | 0 | 3.64 | 0.533 | 0.591 | −0.068 | |
| Sangzhi | 16 | 29.7871 | 110.0918 | 1390 | 10/1/0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Shimen | 17 | 30.0496 | 110.5237 | 1830 | 10/12/0 | 0 | 0.5455 | – | – | – | – | |
| Yangmingshan | 18 | 26.0932 | 111.9219 | 867 | 10/20/15 | 0 | 0.5263 | 2.82 | 0.429 | 0.555 | −0.259 | |
| Yizhang | 19 | 24.9719 | 112.9421 | 812 | 10/16/14 | 0 | 0.5333 | 4.61 | 0.605 | 0.690 | −0.106 | |
| Daweishan | 20 | 28.4275 | 114.0516 | 412 | 8/10/0 | 0 | 0.4667 | – | – | – | – | |
| Jiangxi | Dayu | 21 | 25.4168 | 114.0499 | 520 | 3/6/3 | 0 | 0.6000 | 2.17 | 0.389 | 0.667 | −0.600 |
| Jinggangshan | 22 | 26.5175 | 114.0994 | 896 | 9/0/15 | 0.6667 | – | 4.52 | 0.547 | 0.530 | 0.065 | |
| Luxi | 23 | 27.5613 | 114.1933 | 525 | 11/7/5 | 0 | 0 | 2.67 | 0.499 | 0.633 | −0.160 | |
| Xiushui | 24 | 28.7871 | 114.7388 | 651 | 9/7/15 | 0.2222 | 0.5714 | 3.29 | 0.411 | 0.579 | −0.377 | |
| Guanshan | 25 | 28.5549 | 114.5923 | 488 | 10/10/15 | 0 | 0.5556 | 5.02 | 0.630 | 0.733 | −0.130 | |
| Xinfeng | 26 | 25.2429 | 115.1833 | 278 | 9/20/15 | 0 | 0.5263 | 1.50 | 0.250 | 0.500 | −1.000 | |
| Yihuang | 27 | 27.3806 | 116.0814 | 500 | 4/9/5 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 0.267 | 0.444 | −0.569 | |
| Yifeng | 28 | 26.8678 | 115.7725 | 470 | 10/10/5 | 0 | 0 | 3.17 | 0.457 | 0.500 | 0.016 | |
| Ruijin | 29 | 26.0231 | 115.8370 | 320 | 4/6/6 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 0.275 | 0.528 | −0.900 | |
| Shicheng | 30 | 26.0245 | 116.3417 | 407 | 8/16/6 | 0 | 0.5333 | 3.00 | 0.514 | 0.694 | −0.269 | |
| Lichuan | 31 | 27.0694 | 116.9326 | 682 | 10/0/15 | 0.5556 | – | 4.30 | 0.572 | 0.646 | −0.095 | |
| Bijiafeng | 32 | 27.9242 | 117.8781 | 470 | 6/15/11 | 0 | 0.4762 | 3.67 | 0.570 | 0.476 | 0.231 | |
| Guixi | 33 | 28.3597 | 117.2083 | 1100 | 8/10/9 | 0 | 0 | 2.33 | 0.347 | 0.375 | −0.015 | |
| Shangrao | 34 | 27.9864 | 118.0458 | 997 | 8/4/15 | 0 | 0.5000 | 3.49 | 0.544 | 0.481 | 0.153 | |
| Wuyishan | 35 | 27.8433 | 117.7264 | 909 | 3/0/14 | 0.6667 | – | 4.95 | 0.644 | 0.553 | 0.203 | |
| Fujian | Jiangle | 36 | 26.5196 | 117.2682 | 699 | 9/0/15 | 0 | – | 3.48 | 0.515 | 0.522 | 0.024 |
| Zhejiang | Suichang | 37 | 28.3159 | 119.0049 | 586 | 8/3/0 | 0.4286 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Qingyuan | 38 | 27.6464 | 119.1687 | 586 | 7/2/0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | |
| Total/mean | 38 | 0.5662 | 0.7830 | 3.66 | 0.512 | 0.597 | −0.201 | |||||
-: data not available
Fig. 2a Distribution of ITS ribotypes of Eomecon chionantha. b The network of 15 ribotypes
Fig. 3Bayesian skyline analysis based on cpDNA and nITS sequence of Eomecon chionantha
Fig. 4a, b, c Potential distribution of Eomecon chionantha at present, the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the Mid Holocene, respectively. The climate data at LGM and MH were simulated by the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4). d, e, f cpDNA dispersal corridor of E. chionantha at the present, the LGM and the MH, respectively. g, h, i nITS dispersal corridor of E. chionantha at the present, the LGM and the MH, respectively. Warmer color depicts higher population connectivity