Chemoselective Polymerization of Polar Divinyl Monomers with Rare-Earth/Phosphine Lewis Pairs.

This work reports the chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers, including allyl methacrylate (AMA), vinyl methacrylate (VMA), and 4-vinylbenzyl methacrylate (VBMA), by using simple Lewis pairs comprised of homoleptic rare-earth (RE) aryloxide complexes RE(OAr)₃ (RE = Sc (1), Y (2), Sm (3), La (4), Ar = 2,6-tBu₂C₆H₃) and phosphines PR₃ (R = Ph, Cy, Et, Me). Catalytic activities of polymerizations relied heavily upon the cooperation of Lewis acid and Lewis base components. The produced polymers were soluble in common organic solvents and often had a narrow molecular weight distribution. A highly syndiotactic poly(allyl methacrylate) (PAMA) with rr ~88% could be obtained by the scandium complex 1/PEt₃ pair at -30 °C. In the case of poly(4-vinylbenzyl methacrylate) (PVBMA), it could be post-functionalized with PhCH₂SH. Mechanistic study, including the isolation of the zwitterionic active species and the end-group analysis, revealed that the frustrated Lewis pair (FLP)-type addition was the initiating step in the polymerization.

1. Introduction

The post-modification of polymers containing reactive vinyl groups offers a great opportunity to obtain many advanced functional materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers represents one of the most powerful methods to produce such polymers. Among the enormous efforts which have been made so far, anionic [8,9] and radical [10,11,12,13] polymerization have been extensively investigated. However, achieving complete chemoselectivity and preventing crosslinking during the whole process remains a great challenge, especially in the later stage of the polymerization [14]. To maintain the chemoselectivity of the polymerization at the later stage, harsh reaction conditions (e.g., low temperature or suitable Lewis acid additive) were often required [15,16]. Limited catalyst systems have been developed for the chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers under mild conditions [15]. Chen’s group recently reported an elegant example of the chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers by using chiral ansa-zirconocene enolates, affording a highly stereotactic polymer [17,18]. The same group achieved complete chemoselectivity in the polymerization of multivinyl-functionalized γ-butyrolactones by utilizing N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysts [19]. Chemoselective polymerization of allyl methacrylate was also realized by a yttrium monoalkyl complex [20].

Inspired by flourishing frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) chemistry [21,22], Lewis pair polymerization (LPP) of polar alkenes by main-group Al- or B-based Lewis pairs was successfully achieved in recent years [23,24,25,26,27,28]. We reported the polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and its cyclic analogues by using the intramolecular cationic rare-earth (RE)-based Lewis pairs [29]. Subsequently, enhanced polymerization activity and extended monomer scope were realized by utilizing simple intermolecular Lewis pairs which are composed of homoleptic rare-earth metal tris-aryloxides RE(OAr)3 and phosphines PR3 [30]. We herein found that such rare-earth/phosphine systems also enabled the chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers, affording polymers with the retention of pendant C=C bonds (Scheme 1). These results will be described and discussed in this article.

Scheme 1

Rare-earth (RE)-based Lewis pairs and monomers examined in this work. AMA: allyl methacrylate; VBMA: 4-vinylbenzyl methacrylate; VMA: vinyl methacrylate.

2. Results and Discussion

First, we examined the polymerization of allyl methacrylate (AMA) using our RE-based Lewis pairs. Polymerization experiment was conducted with the 1/PPh3 pair in a Lewis acid/Lewis base (LA/LB) ratio of 2 and a [AMA]/[LB] ratio of 200, and no polymer was yielded up to 24 h (Table 1, entry 1). Replacement of the Lewis base PPh3 with a more basic tris-alkyl phosphine tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy3) led to a 100% monomer conversion after 25 min (Table 1, entry 2). The 1H-NMR spectrum of the resulting polymer clearly showed that the allylic C=C bond remained unreacted. The high Mn (12.3 × 104 g/mol) of the polymer probably resulted from the steric hindrance of the zwitterionic propagating species [26,30]. We thus performed the same polymerization with the less-sterically hindered triethylphosphine (PEt3), which yielded a polymer with a more controlled Mn of 5.03 × 104 g/mol and a syndiotacticity of 79.9% (Table 1, entry 3). A higher syndiotactic PAMA (rr value of 87.8%) could be obtained by conducting the polymerization at −30 °C, albeit with a low activity (Table 1, entry 4). Even switching to a less-sterically hindered trimethylphosphine (PMe3) did not obviously change the polymerization results (Table 1, entry 5). It is well-established that the catalytic reactivity of rare-earth metal complexes highly relies on the metal ionic radii [31,32]. Subsequently, the larger metals in the series were employed as the Lewis acid components in the polymerization, with PEt3 as the Lewis base component. Excitingly, all of the polymerizations showed complete chemoselective behaviors. Quantitative monomer consumptions were achieved in 3 min for 2 (Table 1, entry 6) and 1 min for 3 and 4 (Table 1, entries 7 and 8), respectively. The polydispersity (PDI) of the produced polymer was also narrow (1.34–1.42). This showed that the polymerization activity increased with the increasing of metal ionic radius (La > Sm > Y > Sc). For the 4/PEt3 pair, with a very small amount of catalyst loading (0.25 mol %), quantitative monomer conversion could be achieved in 5 min, producing syndiotactic-rich PAMA with high molecular weight (Table 1, entry 9). Notably, control experiments by using either the Sc complex 1 or the La complex 4 alone in the AMA polymerization under standard conditions led to no monomer conversion, even up to 24 h (Table S1, entries 12 and 13).

Table 1

Chemoselective polymerization of polar divinyl monomers with homoleptic rare-earth aryloxide-based Lewis pairs a.

Entry	Monomer	LA	LB	[M]/[LB]	T (min)	Conv. (%)	Mn (104 g/mol)	PDI (Mw/Mn)	Mn(theo) b (104 g/mol)	rr (%)	mr (%)	mm (%)
1	AMA	1	PPh3	200	1440	0	-	-	-	-	-	-
2	AMA	1	PCy3	200	25	100	12.3	1.33	2.55	79.8	19.6	0.6
3	AMA	1	PEt3	200	15	100	5.03	1.23	2.54	79.9	19.5	0.6
4 c	AMA	1	PEt3	200	1440	75	10.8	1.38	2.54	87.8	11.4	0.8
5	AMA	1	PMe3	200	30	90	5.09	1.23	2.53	79.2	20.0	0.8
6	AMA	2	PEt3	200	3	100	8.57	1.41	2.54	75.3	23.5	1.2
7	AMA	3	PEt3	200	1	100	9.16	1.34	2.54	75.0	23.7	1.7
8	AMA	4	PEt3	200	<1	100	10.0	1.42	2.54	72.5	26.0	1.5
9	AMA	4	PEt3	400	5	100	15.3	1.76	5.06	72.8	25.4	1.8
10	VMA	1	PEt3	100	10	100	5.62	1.36	1.13	75.6	22.6	1.8
11	VMA	1	PMe3	100	10	100	7.59	1.31	1.13	76.8	21.6	1.6
12	VMA	4	PEt3	100	1	100	4.74	1.76	1.13	69.3	29.1	1.6
13	VBMA	1	PEt3	100	45	100	2.55	1.87	2.03	75.0	22.5	2.5
14	VBMA	1	PMe3	100	45	100	2.42	1.99	2.03	76.2	22.8	1.0
15	VBMA	4	PEt3	100	5	100	2.92	2.00	2.03	72.1	26.3	1.6

a Conditions: polymerizations were conducted at room temperature in toluene (Vmonomer/Vsolvent: 1:2) and a Lewis acid (LA)/Lewis base (LB) ratio of 2, where n[LA] = 40 μmol. Monomer conversions were determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by gravimetric methods; rr, mr, mm were measured by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Mn and polydispersity (PDI) were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) relative to the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) standards; b Mn(theo) = Mw(M) × [M]/[I] × conversion (%) + MW (chain-end groups); c Polymerization was conducted at −30 °C.

We next examined our RE/P catalytic system for the polymerization of VMA, an analogue of AMA. The 1/PEt3 pair exhibited good activity for the polymerization of VMA, achieving 100% monomer conversion after 10 min. The produced PVMA had a Mn of 5.62 × 104 g/mol and a PDI of 1.34 (Table 1, entry 10). Switching to trimethylphosphine (PMe3) did not noticeably change the polymerization results (Table 1, entry 11). The La complex 4/PEt3 pair also showed high activity in the polymerization, which consumed 100 equivalent monomers within only 1 minute and yielded polymer with a relatively broad PDI of 1.76 (Table 1, entry 12). We then conducted the same polymerization in CH2Cl2, and the resulting polymer showed a narrower PDI of 1.43 (Table S1, entry 17).

A more challenging monomer was VBMA, because the relative reactivity ratio for the methacrylic C=C and the styrenic vinyl group is quite small (r1/r2 = 1.2) [33,34]. Gratifyingly, our intermolecular RE/P systems were found to be active for the chemoselective polymerization of VBMA with the retention of styrenic C=C bonds. This monomer was quantitatively converted to PVBMA in 45 min by the Sc complex 1/PEt3(or PMe3) pair (Table 1, entries 13 and 14). When using the La complex 4/PEt3 pair as a catalyst, polymerization proceeded rapidly and gave 100% monomer conversion in only 5 min (Table 1, entry 15). The resulting PVBMA had a syndiotacticity of 72.1% rr.

Since the polymer obtained in the current polymerization still possessed reactive pendant C=C bonds, we decided to examine if it could undergo post-functionalization reaction. Treatment of the PVBMA with a stoichiometric excess amount of benzyl thiol (PhCH2SH), using catalytic amount of 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN) as the initiator, afforded functionalized product as expected (Scheme 2). The produced polymer had an increased Mn of 6.80 × 104 g/mol and a broader PDI of 3.27, which indicated some degree of cross-linking during the post-functionalization reaction. The 1H-NMR spectrum of the product showed a full conversion of the pendant C=C double bonds, which was evidenced by complete disappearance of the signals corresponding to the olefinic protons in PVBMA (δ 6.64, 5.71 and 5.22 ppm) and appearance of new saturated CH2 signals at δ 2.76 and 2.61 ppm ascribed to [S]CH2CH2[Ph] units (Figure S10).

Scheme 2

Post-functionalization of PVBMA with PhCH2SH. AIBN: 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile).

To explore the mechanism of the current polymerizations, we investigated stoichiometric reactions of the Sc complex 1/PEt3 pair with the abovementioned polar divinyl compounds. First, treatment of the 1/PEt3 pair with AMA in a 1:1 molar ratio in toluene at room temperature yielded the addition product 5 as a white crystalline solid (Scheme 3, 79% yield). Complex 5 could be readily characterized by NMR for the phosphonium cation Et3P+ [δ 36.9 ppm in 31P-NMR; δ 2.05 (m, CH2), 1.25 (m, CH3) ppm in 1H-NMR] and for the ester enolate moiety [δ 5.84 (m, 1H, CH=CH2), 5.08 (m, 2H, CH=CH2), 4.32 (m, 2H, OCH2) ppm in 1H-NMR]. The molecular structure of 5 was also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1), which clearly showed that a kinetically-controlled 1,4-addition reaction occurred during the reaction to produce trans-configured product with an enolate moiety (Sc1-O1 1.9671(11) Å, O1-C1 1.3117(19) Å, C1-C2 1.350(2) Å, O1-C1-C2-C4 4.284(153)°) and an unreacted terminal C=C bond (C6-C7 1.309(3) Å). The analogous reaction of the 1/PEt3 pair with VMA also yielded the trans Sc/P 1,4-addition complex 6 as a white crystalline solid (77% yield, Scheme 3), which was also comprehensively characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure S7). Complex 6 showed similar structural features and spectroscopy properties to those of the AMA addition product 5 (for details, see the Supporting Information). Notably, the 1,4-addition reaction occurred through the conjugated C=C bond, leaving the non-conjugated C=C intact, which is at the origin of the high level of chemoselectivity observed in the polymerization reaction. Subsequently, the polymerizations with the isolated complexes 5 and 6 as initiators were performed. Complex 5 exhibited a low activity for the polymerization of AMA in CH2Cl2, achieving 32% monomer conversion after 24 h (Table 2, entry 1). On the other hand, highly active polymerization could be achieved by adding an additional equivalent of the Lewis acidic Sc complex 1, affording a 100% monomer conversion in 20 min (Table 2, entry 2). The polymerization of VMA catalyzed by complex 6 with [VMA]/[6] = 100 in CH2Cl2 led to no monomer conversion up to 24 h (Table 2, entry 3). Nevertheless, a quantitative monomer consumption was realized in 20 min by adding an additional equivalent of the Sc complex 1 (Table 2, entry 4). These observations indicated that the polymerization requires another equivalent of Lewis acid to activate monomer, which is consistent with the activated monomer propagation mechanism [23,24,25,26,29,30].

Scheme 3

1,4-Addition reactions of the Sc/P Lewis pair to AMA and VMA.

Figure 1

Molecular structure of the AMA addition product 5. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, ellipsoids are drawn at 30% probability. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles(o): Sc1-O1 1.9671(11); O1-C1 1.3117(19); C1-C2 1.350(2); C2-C3 1.498(2); C2-C4 1.516(2); C5-C6 1.482(3); C6-C7 1.309(3); P1-C4 1.8091(17); O1-C1-O2 115.40(14); O1-C1-C2 127.30(16); O2-C1-C2 117.29(14); C1-C2-C3 122.71(15); C4-C2-C3 117.94(15); C4-C2-C1 119.25(15).

Table 2

Chemoselective polymerization of AMA and VMA with complexes 5 and 6. a

Entry	Monomer	Cat.	LA	[M]/[Cat.]	T (min)	Conv. (%)	Mn (104 g/mol)	PDI (Mw/Mn)	rr (%)	mr (%)	mm (%)
1	AMA	5	-	100	1440	32	2.12	1.45	75.3	21.5	3.2
2	AMA	5	1	100	20	100	4.23	1.42	78.4	19.6	2.0
3	VMA	6	-	100	1440	0	-	-	-	-	-
4	VMA	6	1	100	20	100	4.89	1.42	77.4	21.7	0.9

a Conditions: polymerizations were conducted at room temperature in CH2Cl2 (Vmonomer/Vsolvent: 1:2) by using 20 μmol catalyst. Monomer conversions were determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by gravimetric methods; rr, mr and mm were measured by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Mn and PDI were determined by GPC in DMF relative to the PMMA standards.

Finally, we also conducted an oligomerization reaction using the scandium complex 1/PEt3 pair in an [AMA]/[PEt3] molar ratio of 20. After quenching with wet MeOH, the resulting oligomer was then analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS spectrum (Figure S11). It clearly showed a major series of mass ions with a repeat unit of 126.10, which corresponded to the mass of the AMA monomer. A plot of m/z values of this series versus the number of AMA repeat units produced a straight line with a slope of 126.10 and an intercept of 119.47 (Figure S12). The intercept is equal to the sum of H+ and PEt3, suggesting that the produced oligomer has a structural formula of Et3P+-(AMA)n-H, where the phosphorus atom is attached to AMA. Thus, the polymerization was initiated by an FLP-type 1,4-addition reaction of the RE/P Lewis pair to the monomer.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All manipulations were performed under a dry Argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques or in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. Solvents (including deuterated solvents used for NMR) were dried and distilled prior to use. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker (Beijing) Scientific Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Chemical shifts were reported as δ units with reference to the residual solvent resonance or an external standard. The assignments of NMR data were supported by 1D and 2D-NMR experiments. Elemental analysis data was recorded on a Carlo-Erba EA-1110 instrument (CE Instruments Ltd, Wigan, UK). AMA and VMA were purchased from TCI (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The VBMA was synthesized by following the literature procedures [35]. These monomers were dried over CaH2 and distilled prior to use. Phosphines—including PPh3, PCy3, PEt3, and PMe3—were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Alfa Aesar (China) Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and used as received. RE(OAr)3 (RE = Sc (1), Y (2), Sm (3), La (4), Ar = 2,6-tBu2C6H3) were synthesized by following the literature procedures [36]. The AIBN was purchased from TCI and purified by recrystallization from methanol prior to use.

3.2. Procedures and Compound Characterization

3.2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Complex 5

To a solution of Sc(OAr)3 (132 mg, 0.2 mmol) and AMA (25 mg, 0.2 mmol) in toluene (0.5 mL), PEt3 (24 mg, 0.2 mmol, in 0.5 mL of toluene) was added. After standing at room temperature for 1 h, a large amount of colorless crystalline solid was precipitated, which was then washed with hexane (2 × 0.5 mL) to give complex 5 (150 mg, 79%). Crystals suitable for the single-crystal X-ray structure analysis were grown from a benzene solution of 5 at room temperature. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 7.04 (m, 6H, m-OAr), 6.50 (m, 3H, p-OAr), 5.84 (m, 1H, CH=CH2), 5.08 (m, 2H, CH=CH2), 4.32 (m, 2H, OCH2), 2.88 (d, 2JPH = 11.1 Hz, 2H, PCH2C=), 2.05 (m, 6H, PCH2CH3), 1.52 (m, 3H, CH3C=), 1.42 (s, 54H, C(CH3)3), 1.25 (m, 9H, PCH2CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 163.4 (i-OAr), 159.5 (d, 3JPC = 8.9 Hz, OC=), 139.0 (o-OAr), 135.6 (CH=CH2), 125.1 (m-OAr), 116.8 (CH=CH2), 115.8 (p-OAr), 68.3 (d, 5JPC = 1.4 Hz, OCH2), 67.2 (d, 2JPC = 9.6 Hz, CH3C=), 35.8 (C(CH3)3), 32.7 (C(CH3)3), 24.1 (d, 1JPC = 45.7 Hz, PCH2C=), 18.5 (d, 3JPC = 1.0 Hz, CH3C=), 12.5 (d, 1JPC = 47.1 Hz, PCH2CH3), 6.0 (d, 2JPC = 5.1 Hz, PCH2CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 36.9 (ν1/2 ~ 5 Hz). Elemental Analysis: calculated for C55H88O5PSc·0.5C7H8: C, 73.86; H, 9.75. Found: C, 73.75; H, 9.30.

X-ray crystal structure analysis of complex 5: formula C55H88O5PSc·C6H6, M = 944.24, colorless, 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm, a = 18.7281(8), b = 18.5836(7), c = 16.1009(7) Å, β = 100.6070°, V = 5507.9(4) Å3, ρcalc = 1.139 g cm−3, μ = 0.207 mm−1, Z = 4, monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c, λ = 0.71073 Å, T = 120(2) K, Multi-scan, 87,725 reflections collected (±h, ±k, ±l), 12,616 independent (R(int) = 0.0565) and 9925 observed reflections [I > 2σ(I)], 608 refined parameters, R = 0.0381, wR2 = 0.1267, max. (min.) residual electron density 0.550 (−0.625) e.Å−3, hydrogen atoms were calculated and refined as riding atoms.

3.2.2. Preparation and Characterization of Complex 6

Following the procedure described for 5, reaction of Sc(OAr)3 (132 mg, 0.2 mmol) and VMA (22 mg, 0.2 mmol) with PEt3 (24 mg, 0.2 mmol) gave 6 as colorless crystals (151 mg, 77%). Crystals suitable for the X-ray single-crystal structure analysis were grown from a benzene solution of 6 at room temperature. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 7.05 (m, 6H, m-OAr), 6.98 (overlapped, 1H, CH=CH2), 6.51 (m, 3H, p-OAr), 4.36 (m, 1H, CH=CH2), 3.99 (m, 1H, CH=CH2), 2.90 (d, 2JPH = 11.5 Hz, 2H, PCH2C=), 2.07 (m, 6H, PCH2CH3), 1.48 (d, 4JPH = 2.9 Hz, 3H, CH3C=), 1.41 (s, 54H, C(CH3)3), 1.28 (m, 9H, PCH2CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 163.3 (i-OAr), 157.3 (d, 3JPC = 9.0 Hz, OC=), 148.1 (OCH=CH2), 139.0 (o-OAr), 125.1 (m-OAr), 116.0 (p-OAr), 89.8 (OCH=CH2), 68.4 (d, 2JPC = 9.4 Hz, CH3C=), 35.7 (C(CH3)3), 32.6 (C(CH3)3), 23.4 (d, 1JPC = 45.7 Hz, PCH2C=), 18.2 (d, 3JPC = 1.0 Hz, CH3C=), 12.4 (d, 1JPC = 47.3 Hz, PCH2CH3), 6.0 (d, 2JPC = 5.2 Hz, PCH2CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz, CD2Cl2, 298 K): δ = 36.9 (ν1/2 ~ 5 Hz). Elemental Analysis: calculated for C54H86O5PSc·C7H8: C, 74.51; H, 9.64. Found: C, 74.66; H, 9.26.

X-ray crystal structure analysis of complex 6: formula C54H86O5PSc·0.5C6H6, M = 930.21, colorless, 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm, a = 18.8243(9), b = 18.4532(8), c = 16.0590(8) Å, β = 100.998(2)°, V = 5475.9(4) Å3, ρcalc = 1.128 gcm−3, μ = 0.208 mm−1, Z = 4, monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c, λ = 0.71073 Å, T = 120(2) K, Multi-scan, 118,961 reflections collected (±h, ±k, ±l), 12,526 independent (R(int) = 0.0499) and 10,196 observed reflections [I > 2σ(I)], 599 refined parameters, R = 0.0358, wR2 = 0.1288, max. (min.) residual electron density 0.601 (−0.713) e.Å−3, hydrogen atoms were calculated and refined as riding atoms.

3.2.3. General Polymerization Procedures

Polymerizations were performed in 20 mL oven-dried glass reactors at room temperature inside the glovebox. A predetermined amount of RE(OAr)3 (2 equiv.) was first dissolved in the solvent and monomer. Then, the polymerization was started by rapid addition of a solution of Lewis base via a pipette to the above solution under vigorous stirring. After the measured time interval, a 0.1 mL aliquot was taken from the reaction mixture and quickly quenched into a 4-mL vial containing 0.6 mL of undried “wet” CDCl3. The quenched aliquots were later analyzed by 1H-NMR to obtain the monomer conversion data. After the removal of the aliquot, the polymerization was immediately quenched by the addition of 5 mL 5% HCl-acidified methanol. The quenched mixture was poured into 50 mL methanol, stirred for 1 h, filtered, washed, and dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C overnight to a constant weight to verify the polymer conversions determined by 1H-NMR.

3.2.4. Polymer Characterizations

Polymer number (Mn) and weight (Mw) average molecular weights and polydispersity index (PDI = Mw/Mn) were measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analyses carried out at 40 °C and a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min with DMF as the eluent, on a Waters University 1515 GPC instrument coupled with a Waters RI detector and equipped with four PLgel 5 μm mixed-C columns. The instrument was calibrated with 10 PMMA standards, and chromatograms were processed with Waters Empower 2 software.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have reported the complete chemoselective polymerization of a series of polar divinyl monomers under mild condition by the utilization of homoleptic rare-earth aryloxide-based Lewis pairs. Catalytic activities of polymerizations were highly dependent on the ionic radii of RE ions and electronic/steric profiles of the Lewis bases. The resulting polymers, bearing pendant C=C double bonds, could easily undergo post-functionalization with the thiol reagent. Remarkably, a highly syndiotactic PAMA with rr ~88% could be produced by such an RE-based Lewis pair system. The isolation of zwitterionic propagating species and the end-group analysis suggested that current polymerization was initiated by an RE/P FLP-type 1,4-addition, rather than RE covalent bond insertion or single-electron transfer in the traditional RE-catalyzed polymerizations.