Literature DB >> 29416007

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveals that mouse chemical iPSCs have closer epigenetic features to mESCs than OSKM-integrated iPSCs.

Wangfang Ping1,2,3, Jian Hu4, Gongcheng Hu1,3, Yawei Song1,3, Qing Xia1,3, Mingze Yao1,3, Shixin Gong1,3, Cizhong Jiang5, Hongjie Yao6,7.   

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cells can be derived from somatic cells through ectopic expression of transcription factors or chemical cocktails. Chemical iPSCs (C-iPSCs) and OSKM-iPSCs (4F-iPSCs) have been suggested to have similar characteristics to mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). However, their epigenetic equivalence remains incompletely understood throughout the genome. In this study, we have generated mouse C-iPSCs and 4F-iPSCs, and further compared the genome-wide DNA methylomes of C-iPSCs, 4F-iPSCs, and mESCs that were maintained in 2i and LIF. Three pluripotent stem cells tend to be low methylated overall, however, DNA methylations in some specific regions (such as retrotransposons) are cell type-specific. Importantly, C-iPSCs are more hypomethylated than 4F-iPSCs. Bisulfite sequencing indicated that DNA methylation status in several known imprinted clusters, such as: Dlk1-Dio3 and Peg12-Ube3a, in C-iPSCs are closer to those of mESCs than 4F-iPSCs. Overall, our data demonstrate the reprogramming methods-dependent epigenetic differences of C-iPSCs and 4F-iPSCs and reveal that C-iPSCs are more hypomethylated than OSKM-integrated iPSCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29416007      PMCID: PMC5833453          DOI: 10.1038/s41419-017-0234-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Dis            Impact factor:   8.469


  51 in total

1.  Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12.

Authors:  Shau-Ping Lin; Neil Youngson; Shuji Takada; Hervé Seitz; Wolf Reik; Martina Paulsen; Jerome Cavaille; Anne C Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-24       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  X-inactivation, imprinting, and long noncoding RNAs in health and disease.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease.

Authors:  Denes Hnisz; Brian J Abraham; Tong Ihn Lee; Ashley Lau; Violaine Saint-André; Alla A Sigova; Heather A Hoke; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines.

Authors:  Kyoko Miura; Yohei Okada; Takashi Aoi; Aki Okada; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Keisuke Okita; Masato Nakagawa; Michiyo Koyanagi; Koji Tanabe; Mari Ohnuki; Daisuke Ogawa; Eiji Ikeda; Hideyuki Okano; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Mouse models of Prader-Willi Syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandrina Bervini; Herbert Herzog
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state.

Authors:  Marius Wernig; Alexander Meissner; Ruth Foreman; Tobias Brambrink; Manching Ku; Konrad Hochedlinger; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all-iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Effie Apostolou; Francesco Ferrari; Jiho Choi; Ryan M Walsh; Taiping Chen; Steen S K Ooi; Sang Yong Kim; Timothy H Bestor; Toshi Shioda; Peter J Park; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  MOABS: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data.

Authors:  Deqiang Sun; Yuanxin Xi; Benjamin Rodriguez; Hyun Jung Park; Pan Tong; Mira Meong; Margaret A Goodell; Wei Li
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  Jill M Dowen; Zi Peng Fan; Denes Hnisz; Gang Ren; Brian J Abraham; Lyndon N Zhang; Abraham S Weintraub; Jurian Schujiers; Tong Ihn Lee; Keji Zhao; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Chemical compound-based direct reprogramming for future clinical applications.

Authors:  Yukimasa Takeda; Yoshinori Harada; Toshikazu Yoshikawa; Ping Dai
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Somatic Reprogramming-Above and Beyond Pluripotency.

Authors:  Yaa-Jyuhn James Meir; Guigang Li
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Stabilization of heterochromatin by CLOCK promotes stem cell rejuvenation and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Chuqian Liang; Zunpeng Liu; Moshi Song; Wei Li; Zeming Wu; Zehua Wang; Qiaoran Wang; Si Wang; Kaowen Yan; Liang Sun; Tomoaki Hishida; Yanning Cai; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Pedro Guillen; Piu Chan; Qi Zhou; Weiqi Zhang; Jing Qu; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 25.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.