| Literature DB >> 29415922 |
Takayuki Mineshige1,2, Kikumi Ogihara3, Junichi Kamiie1, Go Sugahara1, James Kenn Chambers4, Kazuyuki Uchida4, Hiroo Madarame5, Kinji Shirota1.
Abstract
Canine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) shows highly invasive and locally destructive growth. In animal models and human cancer cases, periostin plays a critical role in the enhancement of cancer growth; however, the mechanism of involvement in canine cancers remains unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the involvement of periostin in the pathophysiology of SCC in dogs. We examined the localization of periostin and periostin-producing cells in 20 SCC and three squamous papilloma specimens. Furthermore, we focused on transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, which was assumed to be an inducing factor of periostin, using culture cells. By immunohistochemistry, limited periostin expression in the stroma was observed in all squamous papillomas. In SCC, periostin protein diffusely expressed at the tumor invasion front of cancer growth. In situ hybridization revealed that periostin mRNA was expressed in the stromal fibroblasts in SCC. In vitro analysis determined that canine SCC cells expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 mRNA compared with canine keratinocytes. In addition, recombinant TGF-β1 induced secretion of periostin from cultured dermal fibroblasts. These data suggest that periostin produced by stromal fibroblasts may be involved in the pathophysiology of canine SCC. TGF-β1 derived from SCC cells may stimulate fibroblasts to produce periostin.Entities:
Keywords: dog; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization; periostin; squamous cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29415922 PMCID: PMC5880828 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Signalment of dogs with squamous cell carcinoma, histopathological subtypes and the results of immunohistochemical examination of periostin
| Case No. | Signalment of dogs | Histopathological Subtypes | Immunohistochemical score and localization of periostinb) | Remark | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Breed | Sex/Agea) | Non-marginal region of cancer | Marginal region of cancer | |||||||
| BMc) | Mesh-liked) | Diffusee) | BMc) | Mesh-liked) | Diffusee) | ||||||
| 1 | Nose | Mixed | F/7y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | |
| 2 | Armpit | Shih Tzu | F/10y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 3+ | 0 | 0 | 3+ | |
| 3 | Eyelid | Labrador Retriever | F/13y | Well-differented | 1+ | 1+ | 2+ | 0 | 0 | 1+ | |
| 4 | Hind leg | Welsh Corgi | M/10y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 3+ | |
| 5 | Eyelid | Shetland Sheepdog | F/9y | Well-differented | 3+ | 3+ | 0 | NEf) | NEf) | NEf) | Tru-cutg) |
| 6 | Face | Bulldog | M/11y | Well-differented | 1+ | 0 | 1+ | 1+ | 0 | 1+ | |
| 7 | Chest | Mixed | F/16y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 3+ | |
| 8 | Nail bed | Bulldog | M/9y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 1+ | |
| 9 | Abdomen | Great Pyrenees | C/8y | Acantholytic | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 2+ | |
| 10 | Mandible | Jack Russell Terrier | S/11y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | Nail bed | Labrador Retriever | S/9y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 2+ | |
| 12 | Penis | Mixed | M/15y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2+ | |
| 13 | Neck | Shih Tzu | S/9y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 14 | Armpit | Shiba | C/13y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1+ | |
| 15 | Nail bed | Mixed | M/unknown | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | NEf) | NEf) | NEf) | Small sample |
| 16 | Back | Mixed | S/13y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 3+ | |
| 17 | Neck | Labrador Retriever | M/13y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 1+ | |
| 18 | Nail bed | Labrador Retriever | M/9y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 19 | Face | Bernese Mountain Dog | F/11y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1+ | |
| 20 | Neck | Labrador Retriever | M/11y | Well-differented | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
a) M, male; F, female; C, castrated male; S, spayed female; y, years old, b) 0<10%, 1+10–50%, 2+50–80%, 3+>80%, c) BM, basement membrane pattern, d) Mesh-like pattern, e) Diffuse pattern, f) NE, Not estimated, g) Biopsy was done by Tru-Cut Needle. It’s difficult to analyse periostin immunolabeling in marginal region of cancer.
Fig. 1.Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of periostin. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein (a–d). a. Squamous papilloma, dog, skin. Limited periostin protein expression was observed in stroma (arrow heads) (42 ×). b. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 16. The deposition of periostin was diffusely observed in the cancer stroma, particularly at the marginal region (42 ×). c. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 8. Mesh-like pattern periostin protein expression was observed in the neoplastic stroma at the non-infiltrative area (100 ×). d. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 5. The periostin was expressed in the cancer stroma, particularly along the basement membrane (arrows) (200 ×). e. The deposition patterns of periostin were graded according to rate of periostin deposition from (−) to (3+), with (−) indicating no or low expression (<10%), (1+) indicating weak deposition (10–50%), (2+) indicating moderate deposition (50–80%), and (3+) indicating high periostin deposition (>80%) (periostin protein expression scores). There was a significant difference in the periostin protein expression scores in diffuse pattern between marginal region and non-marginal regions (*P<0.05; unpaired t-test).
Fig. 2.Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 7. a. The red color indicates a positive signal for periostin mRNA (fast red). The periostin mRNA was expressed in fibroblasts surrounding cancer (100 ×). Inset: high-power magnification view of periostin mRNA positive cells (arrow). In situ hybridization (ISH) for periostin. b. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein. Periostin protein expression was prominent in the peripheral stroma (100 ×). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for periostin. c. No periostin mRNA signal was observed with the sense probe (100 ×). ISH (sense probe). d. No staining was observed with non-immune rabbit IgG in neoplastic stroma (100 ×). IHC using non-immune rabbit IgG.
Fig. 3.Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in canine squamous cell carcinoma cell line (Sqc-1) and canine keratinocyte cell line (CPEK). The ratio of TGF-β1/GAPDH mRNA expression was significantly higher in Sqc-1 than CPEK (***P<0.001; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Fig. 4.Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of periostin in the cultured dermal fibroblasts at six and 24 hr after stimulation with or without 10 ng/ml recombinant TGF-β1 (*P<0.05; vs Unstimulated cells; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).