Literature DB >> 29415922

Increased expression of the stromal fibroblast-secreted periostin in canine squamous cell carcinomas.

Takayuki Mineshige1,2, Kikumi Ogihara3, Junichi Kamiie1, Go Sugahara1, James Kenn Chambers4, Kazuyuki Uchida4, Hiroo Madarame5, Kinji Shirota1.   

Abstract

Canine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) shows highly invasive and locally destructive growth. In animal models and human cancer cases, periostin plays a critical role in the enhancement of cancer growth; however, the mechanism of involvement in canine cancers remains unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the involvement of periostin in the pathophysiology of SCC in dogs. We examined the localization of periostin and periostin-producing cells in 20 SCC and three squamous papilloma specimens. Furthermore, we focused on transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, which was assumed to be an inducing factor of periostin, using culture cells. By immunohistochemistry, limited periostin expression in the stroma was observed in all squamous papillomas. In SCC, periostin protein diffusely expressed at the tumor invasion front of cancer growth. In situ hybridization revealed that periostin mRNA was expressed in the stromal fibroblasts in SCC. In vitro analysis determined that canine SCC cells expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 mRNA compared with canine keratinocytes. In addition, recombinant TGF-β1 induced secretion of periostin from cultured dermal fibroblasts. These data suggest that periostin produced by stromal fibroblasts may be involved in the pathophysiology of canine SCC. TGF-β1 derived from SCC cells may stimulate fibroblasts to produce periostin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dog; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization; periostin; squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29415922      PMCID: PMC5880828          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


The spontaneous occurrence of cancers in dogs has received attention and suggested the use of canine model for human cancer biology and translational cancer therapeutics [27]. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common cutaneous malignant neoplasm occurring in dogs [6, 11]. In general, canine SCC is highly invasive, locally destructive, and shares similarities with human invasive SCC [9, 11, 26]. Canine SCC is classified into three groups: 1) well-differentiated; 2) moderately differentiated; and 3) poorly differentiated; however, statistics on histological grading or subtypes are rarely given [11]. The tumors consist of not only neoplastic cells but also the tumor microenvironment, such as fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, vasculature, extracellular matrix (ECM), and extracellular molecules [5, 17]. Matricellular proteins are secreted ECM proteins, which modulate cell function by interacting with cell-surface receptors, bioactive molecules, and matrix components, such as collagen [2]. Matricellular proteins are generally present at low levels in most adult tissues but are highly expressed at sites of neoplasm or inflammation in adult humans and experimental animals [2, 17]. Periostin is a recently characterized secretory protein belonging to the group of matricellular proteins [4]. Current studies on animal models and human cases demonstrated that periostin is involved in the pathophysiology of various diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and other inflammatory diseases, as well as cancer [3, 8, 12, 13, 18, 21, 24, 25]. The expression of periostin is increased in various human neoplastic tissues, including cancers of the stomach, colon, pancreas, skin, and other organs [1, 5, 8, 12,13,14]. Several studies have shown that periostin plays a critical role in tumor angiogenesis, growth of neoplastic components, cancer cell motility, and adhesion [12, 13]. We have previously shown that periostin expression was more intense in the skin tissues of AD dogs and correlated with the severity score of chronic histopathological changes (epidermal thickening and fibrosis) and CD3+ cell number in the dermis, similar to that reported in human AD patients [20]. We also reported that IL-13 possibly derived from T cells stimulates periostin production in both keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and then periostin may play a critical role in the pathophysiology of canine AD, particularly in the enhancement and chronicity of skin lesions [19]. However, in canine cancer, periostin expression has not been demonstrated, and its role in cancer is not known. In the present study, we focused on canine SCC, which is a highly invasive cancer [11]. We examined the expression patterns of the periostin protein in SCC of dogs as well as squamous papilloma for comparison. Furthermore, to investigate the source of periostin in SCC, we examined the localization of periostin mRNA by in situ hybridization (ISH) in SCC. In addition, in vitro analysis, we investigated the relationship between periostin and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, which is known as a major trigger of periostin production [10, 25]. Finally, we discussed the possible involvement of periostin in the pathophysiology of SCC in dogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathologic examination

Squamous papilloma (n=3) and SCC (n=20) specimens were obtained from surgical or necropsy samples. The clinical data of 20 dogs of various breeds included in the present study is listed in Table 1. Their ages ranged from seven to 16 years, and the cohort included 10 males and 10 females. These specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). The pathological diagnosis was based on the World Health Organization classification systems [9]. The cases of SCC were subdivided into well-differentiated subtypes (n=19) and an acantholytic subtype (n=1), based on the histological criteria proposed by Gross [11].
Table 1.

Signalment of dogs with squamous cell carcinoma, histopathological subtypes and the results of immunohistochemical examination of periostin

Case No.Signalment of dogs
Histopathological SubtypesImmunohistochemical score and localization of periostinb)
Remark
SiteBreedSex/Agea)Non-marginal region of cancer
Marginal region of cancer
BMc)Mesh-liked)Diffusee)BMc)Mesh-liked)Diffusee)
1NoseMixedF/7yWell-differented001+1+1+2+
2ArmpitShih TzuF/10yWell-differented003+003+
3EyelidLabrador RetrieverF/13yWell-differented1+1+2+001+
4Hind legWelsh CorgiM/10yWell-differented001+003+
5EyelidShetland SheepdogF/9yWell-differented3+3+0NEf)NEf)NEf)Tru-cutg)
6FaceBulldogM/11yWell-differented1+01+1+01+
7ChestMixedF/16yWell-differented001+003+
8Nail bedBulldogM/9yWell-differented001+001+
9AbdomenGreat PyreneesC/8yAcantholytic001+002+
10MandibleJack Russell TerrierS/11yWell-differented000000
11Nail bedLabrador RetrieverS/9yWell-differented001+002+
12PenisMixedM/15yWell-differented000002+
13NeckShih TzuS/9yWell-differented000000
14ArmpitShibaC/13yWell-differented000001+
15Nail bedMixedM/unknownWell-differented001+NEf)NEf)NEf)Small sample
16BackMixedS/13yWell-differented001+003+
17NeckLabrador RetrieverM/13yWell-differented001+001+
18Nail bedLabrador RetrieverM/9yWell-differented000000
19FaceBernese Mountain DogF/11yWell-differented000001+
20NeckLabrador RetrieverM/11yWell-differented000000

a) M, male; F, female; C, castrated male; S, spayed female; y, years old, b) 0<10%, 1+10–50%, 2+50–80%, 3+>80%, c) BM, basement membrane pattern, d) Mesh-like pattern, e) Diffuse pattern, f) NE, Not estimated, g) Biopsy was done by Tru-Cut Needle. It’s difficult to analyse periostin immunolabeling in marginal region of cancer.

a) M, male; F, female; C, castrated male; S, spayed female; y, years old, b) 0<10%, 1+10–50%, 2+50–80%, 3+>80%, c) BM, basement membrane pattern, d) Mesh-like pattern, e) Diffuse pattern, f) NE, Not estimated, g) Biopsy was done by Tru-Cut Needle. It’s difficult to analyse periostin immunolabeling in marginal region of cancer.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using an immunoenzyme polymer method with a rabbit anti-periostin antibody (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.) was performed as previously described [20]. For quantitative morphometric analysis, the localization and distribution of periostin were assessed within two regions of the 18 SCCs: 1) the marginal region, which indicated an invasive front area and 2) the non-marginal region (case Nos. 1–4, 6–14 and 16–20). For two small samples, it was difficult to analyze periostin immunolabeling in marginal region of cancers (case Nos. 5 and 15). The three deposition patterns of periostin were defined as follows: 1) the basement membrane (BM) pattern; 2) the mesh-like pattern, and 3) the diffuse pattern. The three deposition patterns of periostin were graded according to rate of periostin deposition from (−) to (3+), with (−) indicating no or low expression (<10%), (1+) indicating weak deposition (10–50%), (2+) indicating moderate deposition (50–80%), and (3+) indicating high periostin deposition (>80%) (periostin protein expression scores).

In situ hybridization

ISH was performed using QuantiGene® ViewRNA ISH Tissue Assay (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Periostin probes were used in type 1/Fast Red. A red color assay against periostin mRNA was performed as previously described [20].

Establishment of a canine SCC cell line (Sqc-1)

Canine SCC cell line (Sqc-1) was established from a tumor taken from the abdominal skin of a female mixed-breed dog. The tumor was cauliflower-like and ulcerated, measured 25 × 25 × 8 mm, and had a necrotic center. One half of the specimen was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The mass was comprised many neoplastic lobules and showed an invasive nature. Each lobule was composed of epithelial neoplastic cells, which showed squamous cell differentiation. The mitotic activity of neoplastic cells was moderate. The second half of the specimen was immediately placed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The specimen was rinsed five times with PBS and digested with a 0.2% trypsin solution in PBS at 31–32°C for 1 hr. The dispersed cells were then filtered through gauze. The collected cells were washed thrice with Eagle’s minimal essential medium (EMEM, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.), and a 5 × 106 cell suspension was then inoculated in 5 ml of EMEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 0.24 mg/ml tryptose phosphate broth, 2 mM glutamine, 6.6 mg/l spectinomycin, and 0.8 mM NaHCO3 in 60 mm plastic dishes. These cells were cultured until confluence at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Serial cultivation was performed approximately once a week. The cells were examined daily and grew as adherent monolayers with characteristic epithelioid morphological features. We determined that the cells showed these characteristics even after long-term culture. Sqc-1 was transplanted into nude mice in the 300th generation, and the formation of SCC was histologically confirmed. After the cells were subcultured at the 620th generation, they were used for the experiments.

Comparison of TGF-β1 mRNA expression levels of Sqc-1 and CPEK

Commercially available canine keratinocyte cell line (CPEK, CELLnTEC Advanced Cell Systems, Bern, Switzerland) was also used as control in the present study. Sqc-1 or CPEK were grown in 24-well plates (AGC Techno Glass Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan); after washing with PBS to remove all sera, then the cells were serum-starved for 24 hr. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells in triplicate using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen). Extracted total RNA was used in RT-PCR employing the SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). Real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was performed on samples extracted from Sqc-1 and CPEK. Total RNA was extracted from Sqc-1 and CPEK using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit. Extracted total RNA was used in RT-PCR employing the SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit. Quantification of TGF-β1 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression was performed using StepOne™ Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), with sample cDNA in a final volume of 20 µl per reaction. Canine TGF-β1 mRNA primers and probes were designed by Applied Biosystems and supplied as Taqman Gene Expression Assays Mix containing a 20× mix of unlabeled PCR forward and reverse primers, as well as a Taqman MGB probe (Assay ID: Cf02623325_m1). The PCR reaction of periostin mRNA was performed in duplicate for each sample and mean values of the gene expression were calculated as a ratio to those of GAPDH according to the ΔΔCT method.

Cell culture of canine dermal fibroblast

A primary culture of canine dermal fibroblasts was performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, full-depth skin samples obtained from the chest region of normal dogs were immediately placed in PBS with 1% Antibiotic Antimycotic (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Skin samples were rinsed seven times with PBS and were then fragmented in 5-mm2 portions. These skin fragments were laid onto the surface of 60 × 15 mm Petri dishes with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM: F12, 1:1; Invitrogen Life Technologies) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hana-nesco Bio. Co., Tokyo, Japan) and 1% Antibiotic Antimycotic. Cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every three days. Satisfactory proliferation of fibroblasts was observed in approximately twenty days. Fibroblasts between 3rd and 5th passages were used for the experiments.

Stimulation of fibroblasts

Fibroblasts were grown in 24-well plates; after washing with PBS to remove all sera, cells were serum-starved for 24 hr. For real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, fibroblasts were cultured containing 0.2% FBS with or without 10 ng/ml recombinant human TGF-β1 (Peprotech, Rochy Hill, NJ, U.S.A.) for six or 24 hr. After stimulation, total RNA was extracted from cell cultures using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit Extracted total RNA was used in RT-PCR employing the SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit. Quantification of periostin and GAPDH mRNA expression was performed using the StepOne™ Real-Time PCR Systems and the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix, as previously described [20]. The PCR reaction of periostin mRNA was performed in duplicate for each sample, and mean values of the gene expression were calculated as a ratio to those of GAPDH according to the ΔΔCT method.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (ver. 5.0, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.). The unpaired t-test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in the periostin protein expression scores between the marginal and non-marginal regions. Comparisons between Sqc-1 and CPEK in analysis of periostin mRNA expression were performed by the unpaired t-test. The data were analyzed using the unpaired t-test comparing periostin mRNA expression levels between stimulated and non-stimulated cells at the same culture period. All values of P<0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Expression and localization of periostin mRNA and protein in squamous papilloma and SCC of dogs

Limited periostin expression in the stroma was observed in all squamous papillomas (Fig. 1a). Periostin protein expression in SCC was intense in the cancer stroma. The expression of periostin was categorized into three localization patterns of periostin protein: 1) the diffuse type (Fig. 1b); 2) the reticular type (Fig. 1c); and 3) the basement membrane (BM) type (Fig. 1d). In general, periostin protein expression showed a diffuse pattern at the tumor invasion front of cancerous growths, whereas BM or reticular patterns were detected in the center of cancerous growths (Fig. 1e; Table 1). In 14 of 18 SCCs, periostin protein diffusely expressed at the tumor invasion front of cancer growth. Periostin expression levels were no obvious association with sex, age and bleeds. No or faint staining of periostin was observed in neoplastic cells.
Fig. 1.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of periostin. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein (a–d). a. Squamous papilloma, dog, skin. Limited periostin protein expression was observed in stroma (arrow heads) (42 ×). b. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 16. The deposition of periostin was diffusely observed in the cancer stroma, particularly at the marginal region (42 ×). c. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 8. Mesh-like pattern periostin protein expression was observed in the neoplastic stroma at the non-infiltrative area (100 ×). d. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 5. The periostin was expressed in the cancer stroma, particularly along the basement membrane (arrows) (200 ×). e. The deposition patterns of periostin were graded according to rate of periostin deposition from (−) to (3+), with (−) indicating no or low expression (<10%), (1+) indicating weak deposition (10–50%), (2+) indicating moderate deposition (50–80%), and (3+) indicating high periostin deposition (>80%) (periostin protein expression scores). There was a significant difference in the periostin protein expression scores in diffuse pattern between marginal region and non-marginal regions (*P<0.05; unpaired t-test).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of periostin. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein (a–d). a. Squamous papilloma, dog, skin. Limited periostin protein expression was observed in stroma (arrow heads) (42 ×). b. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 16. The deposition of periostin was diffusely observed in the cancer stroma, particularly at the marginal region (42 ×). c. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 8. Mesh-like pattern periostin protein expression was observed in the neoplastic stroma at the non-infiltrative area (100 ×). d. SCC, skin, dog, case No. 5. The periostin was expressed in the cancer stroma, particularly along the basement membrane (arrows) (200 ×). e. The deposition patterns of periostin were graded according to rate of periostin deposition from (−) to (3+), with (−) indicating no or low expression (<10%), (1+) indicating weak deposition (10–50%), (2+) indicating moderate deposition (50–80%), and (3+) indicating high periostin deposition (>80%) (periostin protein expression scores). There was a significant difference in the periostin protein expression scores in diffuse pattern between marginal region and non-marginal regions (*P<0.05; unpaired t-test). Positive signals for periostin mRNA were detected in fibroblasts in the stroma (Fig. 2a) together with protein expression (Fig. 2b). No signals were detected in tissues hybridized for the sense probe or the ISH solution without the probe (Fig. 2c). No staining was observed with non-immune rabbit IgG instead of anti-periostin antibody in cancer stroma (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 7. a. The red color indicates a positive signal for periostin mRNA (fast red). The periostin mRNA was expressed in fibroblasts surrounding cancer (100 ×). Inset: high-power magnification view of periostin mRNA positive cells (arrow). In situ hybridization (ISH) for periostin. b. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein. Periostin protein expression was prominent in the peripheral stroma (100 ×). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for periostin. c. No periostin mRNA signal was observed with the sense probe (100 ×). ISH (sense probe). d. No staining was observed with non-immune rabbit IgG in neoplastic stroma (100 ×). IHC using non-immune rabbit IgG.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), skin, dog, case No. 7. a. The red color indicates a positive signal for periostin mRNA (fast red). The periostin mRNA was expressed in fibroblasts surrounding cancer (100 ×). Inset: high-power magnification view of periostin mRNA positive cells (arrow). In situ hybridization (ISH) for periostin. b. The brown color indicates positive staining for the periostin protein. Periostin protein expression was prominent in the peripheral stroma (100 ×). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for periostin. c. No periostin mRNA signal was observed with the sense probe (100 ×). ISH (sense probe). d. No staining was observed with non-immune rabbit IgG in neoplastic stroma (100 ×). IHC using non-immune rabbit IgG.

Canine SCC cells expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 mRNA compared with canine keratinocytes

The ratio of TGF-β1/GAPDH mRNA expression was significantly higher in Sqc-1 than CPEK (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in canine squamous cell carcinoma cell line (Sqc-1) and canine keratinocyte cell line (CPEK). The ratio of TGF-β1/GAPDH mRNA expression was significantly higher in Sqc-1 than CPEK (***P<0.001; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in canine squamous cell carcinoma cell line (Sqc-1) and canine keratinocyte cell line (CPEK). The ratio of TGF-β1/GAPDH mRNA expression was significantly higher in Sqc-1 than CPEK (***P<0.001; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

TGF-β1 stimulated dermal fibroblasts to produce periostin mRNA

To investigate the effects of TGF-β1 on periostin expression in cultured dermal fibroblasts, we performed real-time RT-PCR. Following 24 hr of TGF-β1 treatment, mRNA expression of periostin was significantly increased as compared with unstimulated fibroblasts (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of periostin in the cultured dermal fibroblasts at six and 24 hr after stimulation with or without 10 ng/ml recombinant TGF-β1 (*P<0.05; vs Unstimulated cells; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels of periostin in the cultured dermal fibroblasts at six and 24 hr after stimulation with or without 10 ng/ml recombinant TGF-β1 (*P<0.05; vs Unstimulated cells; unpaired t-test). Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we found that periostin was deposited intensely in the cancer stroma, particularly at the tumor invasion front. In human and animal models of cancer, periostin is a critical element of the tumor microenvironment as it contributes to the initiation of tumorigenesis and metastasis [1, 5, 7, 8, 12,13,14]. Periostin is a ligand for αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins and promotes neoplastic cell motility and migration [8]. Kikuchi et al. [12] reported that pericryptal or mesh-like patterns of periostin were observed in normal and inflammatory mucosa of the human colon, and a diffuse pattern was evident in carcinoma that was correlated with invasiveness. These reports suggested that periostin may be involved in the infiltration of human cancer. Therefore, from the results of the present study, we suspect that periostin may additionally play an important role in the invasion of SCC in dogs. By ISH analysis, we detected periostin mRNA in the stromal fibroblasts together with periostin protein deposition in canine SCC. These correlations strongly suggest that fibroblasts are the main source of periostin in canine SCC. Recent investigations have additionally demonstrated that periostin is overexpressed by stromal fibroblasts in human cancers [12, 13]. We revealed that Sqc-1 cells expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 mRNA compared with CPEK. In addition, we confirmed the expression of the transforming growth factor beta-receptor 1 (TGF-βR1) gene in cultured canine dermal fibroblasts (date not shown), and recombinant TGF-β1 induced secretion of periostin in these fibroblasts. Previous reports revealed that TGF-β1 was found to be overexpressed in various neoplastic cells such as in breast cancer [22], prostate carcinoma [23] and SCC [15, 16]. Lewis et al. [15] reported that neoplastic cell-derived TGF-β1 promotes HGF/SF-dependent invasion of SCC cells in human. Our results suggested that TGF-β1 is associated with invasion of canine SCC cells as inducing factor of periostin. In conclusion, we suggest the existence of a paracrine periostin loop between stromal fibroblasts and SCC cells. In other words, TGF-β1 derived from SCC cells stimulates fibroblasts to produce periostin. Periostin may promote invasion of cancer cells. In vitro analyses using cultured Sqc-1 may provide valuable information regarding the functional roles of periostin. In vivo analysis targeting TGF-β1 using SCC specimens of various histopathological grades may also provide useful information. The results of the present study provide a molecular basis for periostin as a potential therapeutic target for SCC in dogs.
  25 in total

1.  Signet-ring squamous cell carcinoma in a dog.

Authors:  A Espinosa de los Monteros; M Aguirre-Sanceledonio; G A Ramírez; P Castro; F Rodríguez
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Lebrikizumab treatment in adults with asthma.

Authors:  Jonathan Corren; Robert F Lemanske; Nicola A Hanania; Phillip E Korenblat; Merdad V Parsey; Joseph R Arron; Jeffrey M Harris; Heleen Scheerens; Lawren C Wu; Zheng Su; Sofia Mosesova; Mark D Eisner; Sean P Bohen; John G Matthews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Spontaneously occurring tumors of companion animals as models for human cancer.

Authors:  D M Vail; E G MacEwen
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  The niche component periostin is produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts, supporting growth of gastric cancer through ERK activation.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kikuchi; Akiko Kunita; Caname Iwata; Daisuke Komura; Takashi Nishiyama; Kazuhiro Shimazu; Kimiko Takeshita; Junji Shibahara; Isao Kii; Yasuyuki Morishita; Masakazu Yashiro; Kosei Hirakawa; Kohei Miyazono; Akira Kudo; Masashi Fukayama; Takeshi G Kashima
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  The matricellular protein periostin contributes to proper collagen function and is downregulated during skin aging.

Authors:  M Egbert; M Ruetze; M Sattler; H Wenck; S Gallinat; R Lucius; J M Weise
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.563

6.  Periostin promotes invasion and anchorage-independent growth in the metastatic process of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Yasusei Kudo; Ikuko Ogawa; Shojiro Kitajima; Masae Kitagawa; Hidehiko Kawai; Patrick M Gaffney; Mutsumi Miyauchi; Takashi Takata
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Periostin secreted by epithelial ovarian carcinoma is a ligand for alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(5) integrins and promotes cell motility.

Authors:  Lindsay Gillan; Daniela Matei; David A Fishman; C S Gerbin; Beth Y Karlan; David D Chang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Periostin, a multifunctional matricellular protein in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Allan Yi Liu; Hong Zheng; Gaoliang Ouyang
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 11.583

9.  Periostin potently promotes metastatic growth of colon cancer by augmenting cell survival via the Akt/PKB pathway.

Authors:  Shideng Bao; Gaoliang Ouyang; Xuefang Bai; Zhi Huang; Chaoyu Ma; Ming Liu; Rong Shao; Ryan M Anderson; Jeremy N Rich; Xiao-Fan Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Periostin: a novel component of subepithelial fibrosis of bronchial asthma downstream of IL-4 and IL-13 signals.

Authors:  Go Takayama; Kazuhiko Arima; Taisuke Kanaji; Shuji Toda; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Shunsuke Shoji; Andrew N J McKenzie; Hiroichi Nagai; Takao Hotokebuchi; Kenji Izuhara
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 10.793

View more
  2 in total

1.  Expression of Periostin in Cancer-associated Fibroblasts in Mammary Cancer in Female Dogs.

Authors:  Paulina Borecka; Katarzyna Ratajczak-Wielgomas; Rafal Ciaputa; Małgorzata Kandefer-Gola; Izabela Janus; Aleksandra Piotrowska; Alicja Kmiecik; Marzena Podhorska-Okolów; Piotr Dzięgiel; Marcin Nowak
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Evaluating the Histologic Grade of Digital Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Dogs with Dark and Light Haircoat-A Comparative Study of the Invasive Front and Tumor Cell Budding Systems.

Authors:  Argiñe Cerezo-Echevarria; Julia M Grassinger; Christoph Beitzinger; Robert Klopfleisch; Heike Aupperle-Lellbach
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.