Philippe Sarazin1,2, Igor Burstyn3, Laurel Kincl4, Melissa C Friesen5, Jérôme Lavoué2,6. 1. Chemical and Biological Hazards Prevention, Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 2. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 3. Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States. 4. College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States. 5. Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States. 6. University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
Objectives: The Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) is the largest multi-industry source of exposure results available in North America. In 2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released the Chemical Exposure Health Data (CEHD) that contains analytical results of samples collected by OSHA inspectors. However, the two databanks only partially overlap, raising suspicion of bias in IMIS data. We investigated the factors associated with selective recording of CEHD results into the IMIS databank. Methods: This analysis was based on personal exposure measurements of 24 agents from 1984 to 2009. The association between nine variables (level of exposure coded as detected versus non-detected (ND), whether a sampling result was part of a panel of chemicals, duration of sampling, issuance of a citation, presence of other detected levels during the same inspection, year, OSHA region, amount of penalty, and establishment size) and a CEHD sampling result being reported in IMIS was analyzed using modified Poisson regression. Results: A total of 461900 CEHD sampling results were examined. The proportion of CEHD sampling results recorded into IMIS was 38% (51% for detected and 28% for ND measurements). In the models, the detected sampling results were associated with a higher probability of recording into IMIS than ND sampling results, and this difference was similar for panel versus non-panel samples. Probability of recording remained constant from 1984 to 2009 for sampling results measured on panels but increased for sampling results of single determinations of an agent. Some OSHA regions had probability of recording two times higher than others. No other variables that we examined were associated with a CEHD sampling result being reported in IMIS. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the under-reporting of sampling results in IMIS is differential: ND results (especially those determined from the panels) seem less likely to be recorded in IMIS than other results. It is important to consider both IMIS and CEHD data in order to reduce bias in evaluation of exposures in workplaces inspected by OSHA.
Objectives: The Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) is the largest multi-industry source of exposure results available in North America. In 2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released the Chemical Exposure Health Data (CEHD) that contains analytical results of samples collected by OSHA inspectors. However, the two databanks only partially overlap, raising suspicion of bias in IMIS data. We investigated the factors associated with selective recording of CEHD results into the IMIS databank. Methods: This analysis was based on personal exposure measurements of 24 agents from 1984 to 2009. The association between nine variables (level of exposure coded as detected versus non-detected (ND), whether a sampling result was part of a panel of chemicals, duration of sampling, issuance of a citation, presence of other detected levels during the same inspection, year, OSHA region, amount of penalty, and establishment size) and a CEHD sampling result being reported in IMIS was analyzed using modified Poisson regression. Results: A total of 461900 CEHD sampling results were examined. The proportion of CEHD sampling results recorded into IMIS was 38% (51% for detected and 28% for ND measurements). In the models, the detected sampling results were associated with a higher probability of recording into IMIS than ND sampling results, and this difference was similar for panel versus non-panel samples. Probability of recording remained constant from 1984 to 2009 for sampling results measured on panels but increased for sampling results of single determinations of an agent. Some OSHA regions had probability of recording two times higher than others. No other variables that we examined were associated with a CEHD sampling result being reported in IMIS. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the under-reporting of sampling results in IMIS is differential: ND results (especially those determined from the panels) seem less likely to be recorded in IMIS than other results. It is important to consider both IMIS and CEHD data in order to reduce bias in evaluation of exposures in workplaces inspected by OSHA.
Authors: Martie van Tongeren; Wouter Fransman; Sally Spankie; Martin Tischer; Derk Brouwer; Jody Schinkel; John W Cherrie; Erik Tielemans Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2011-11
Authors: Dirk Taeger; Beate Pesch; Benjamin Kendzia; Thomas Behrens; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Dirk Dahmann; Jack Siemiatycki; Hans Kromhout; Roel Vermeulen; Susan Peters; Ann Olsson; Irene Brüske; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Isabelle Stücker; Florence Guida; Adonina Tardón; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Hermann Pohlabeln; Wolfgang Ahrens; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Anush Mukeriya; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; Per Gustavsson; John Field; Michael W Marcus; Eleonora Fabianova; Andrea 't Mannetje; Neil Pearce; Peter Rudnai; Vladimir Bencko; Vladimir Janout; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Lenka Foretova; Francesco Forastiere; John McLaughlin; Paul Demers Paul Demers; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joachim Schüz; Kurt Straif; Thomas Brüning Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Susan Peters; Roel Vermeulen; Ann Olsson; Rainer Van Gelder; Benjamin Kendzia; Raymond Vincent; Barbara Savary; Nick Williams; Torill Woldbæk; Jérôme Lavoué; Domenico Cavallo; Andrea Cattaneo; Dario Mirabelli; Nils Plato; Dirk Dahmann; Joelle Fevotte; Beate Pesch; Thomas Brüning; Kurt Straif; Hans Kromhout Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2011-10-11
Authors: Melissa C Friesen; Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba; Philippe Sarazin; Jooyeon Hwang; Pamela Dopart; Daniel E Russ; Nicole C Deziel; Jérôme Lavoué; Paul S Albert; Bin Zhu Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.563