| Literature DB >> 34075062 |
Narine M Tonoyan1, Vitaliy V Chagovets1, Natalia L Starodubtseva1,2, Alisa O Tokareva1,3, Konstantin Chingin4, Irena F Kozachenko1, Leyla V Adamyan1, Vladimir E Frankevich5.
Abstract
Uterine fibroids (UF) is the most common (about 70% cases) type of gynecological disease, with the recurrence rate varying from 11 to 40%. Because UF has no distinct symptomatology and is often asymptomatic, the specific and sensitive diagnosis of UF as well as the assessment for the probability of UF recurrence pose considerable challenge. The aim of this study was to characterize alterations in the lipid profile of tissues associated with the first-time diagnosed UF and recurrent uterine fibroids (RUF) and to explore the potential of mass spectrometry (MS) lipidomics analysis of blood plasma samples for the sensitive and specific determination of UF and RUF with low invasiveness of analysis. MS analysis of lipid levels in the myometrium tissues, fibroids tissues and blood plasma samples was carried out on 66 patients, including 35 patients with first-time diagnosed UF and 31 patients with RUF. The control group consisted of 15 patients who underwent surgical treatment for the intrauterine septum. Fibroids and myometrium tissue samples were analyzed using direct MS approach. Blood plasma samples were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography hyphened with mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS). MS data were processed by discriminant analysis with projection into latent structures (OPLS-DA). Significant differences were found between the first-time UF, RUF and control group in the levels of lipids involved in the metabolism of glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, lipids with an ether bond, triglycerides and fatty acids. Significant differences between the control group and the groups with UF and RUF were found in the blood plasma levels of cholesterol esters, triacylglycerols, (lyso) phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins. Significant differences between the UF and RUF groups were found in the blood plasma levels of cholesterol esters, phosphotidylcholines, sphingomyelins and triacylglycerols. Diagnostic models based on the selected differential lipids using logistic regression showed sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 86% for the diagnosis of first-time UF and 95% and 79% for RUF, accordingly. This study confirms the involvement of lipids in the pathogenesis of uterine fibroids. A diagnostically significant panel of differential lipid species has been identified for the diagnosis of UF and RUF by low-invasive blood plasma analysis. The developed diagnostic models demonstrated high potential for clinical use and further research in this direction.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34075062 PMCID: PMC8169782 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89859-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical and demographical data for UF and RUF patients.
| First-time diagnosed uterine fibroids (n = 35) | Recurrent uterine fibroids (n = 31) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 37.6 ± 5.5 | 39.8 ± 5.9 | > 0.5 |
| Body mass index | 24 ± 5.0 | 25 ± 4.0 | < 0.5 |
| Menarche, years | 12.9 ± 1.0 | 12.8 ± 1.3 | > 0.5 |
| Menstrual cycle length, days | 27.8 ± 2.4 | 27.6 ± 3.1 | > 0.5 |
| Duration of menstruation, days | 5.4 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 1.4 | > 0.5 |
| Number of pregnancies | 1.3 ± 1.8 | 1.3 ± 1.5 | > 0.5 |
| Infertility complaints, % | 21.3 | 31.9 | < 0.5 |
| Uterine fibroids in close relatives, % | 49.2 | 56.45 | < 0.05 |
| Duration of surgery, min | 94.6 ± 39.4 | 122.7 ± 61.4 | < 0.001 |
| Blood loss, mL | 234.7 | 299.2 | < 0.001 |
| Duration of infertility, years | 5.6 ± 4.4 | 7 ± 4.5 | < 0.05 |
| Size of the main node, cm | 8.2 ± 4.3 | 6.5 ± 3.8 | < 0.5 |
| Number of removed nodes | 1 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | < 0.5 |
| Submucous fibroids (type 1, 2, FIGO), % | 9.8 | 22.7 | < 0.5 |
| Interstitial-submucous fibroids (type 1,2, FIGO), % | 11.2 | 22.7 | < 0.5 |
Figure 1Relative intensity of marker lipids (p < 0.05) in the mass spectrum of (A) myometrium and (B) uterine fibroids. Orange color corresponds to the first-time diagnosed UF. Yellow color corresponds to RUF. The diagram shows Q1 − 1.5 × IQR, Q1, Me, Q3, Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Black dots correspond to outliers. Cer ceramides, FA fatty acids, PC-O plasmalogens, PA phosphotidyl acids, PE phosphotidylethanolamines, PS phosphotidylserines, TG triacylglycerides.
Figure 2Diagram of metabolic pathways for lipid species with statistically significant abundance variation common for benign tumor and myometrium during recurrence of fibroids.
Figure 3OPLS-DA score plots of plasma lipidomic data (blue dots correspond to control group, red dots correspond to the UF group, and green dots correspond to RUF): (A) Control group vs. first-time diagnosed UF. (B) Control group vs. RUF. (C) First-time diagnosed UF vs. RUF.
The parameters of OPLS-DA models.
| Lipids with VIP > 1 | R2X | R2Y | Q2Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group vs first-time diagnosed UF | LPC 18:2, PC 16:0_20:3, PC 18:0_18:1, PC 18:0_20:3, SM d18:1/22:0, SM d18:1/22:1, SM d18:1/24:0, TG 18:0_18:1_18:1 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| Control group vs RUF | PC 16:0_22:6, PC 16:0_18:2, PC 16:0_20:3, PC 18:0_20:3, PC 18:0_18:1, SM d12:0/14:1, SM d18:1/24:1, SM d18:2/24:1 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.60 |
| First-time diagnosed UF vs RUF | CE 18:2, CE 20:4, PC 16:0_22:6, PC 18:0_18:2, SM d12:0/14:1, SM d18:1/22:0, SM d18:1/22:1, SM d18:1/24:0, SM d18:1/24:1, SM d18:2/16:0, SM d18:2/24:1, TG 14:1_18:1_18:2, TG 16:0_16:1_18:2, TG 16:0_18:1_18:2, TG 16:1_18:0_18:1, TG 16:1_18:0_18:3, TG 18:1_18:2_18:3 | 0.32 | 0.61 | 0.47 |
CE cholesterol esters, LPC lysophosphatidylcholines, PC phosphatidylcholines, SM sphingomyelins, TG triglycerides.
Coefficients for logistic regression of diagnostic model “control group/first-time diagnosed UF”.
| β | CI β | Z stat | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free coefficient | 3.49E1 | 1.84E1 to 6.07E1 | ||
| LPC 18:2 | − 6.46E−6 | − 2.22E−5 to 7.94E−6 | − 0.87 | 0.38 |
| PC 16:0_20:3 | − 5.72E−6 | − 2.02E−5 to 6.64E−6 | − 0.88 | 0.38 |
| PC 18:0_18:1 | − 1.65E−6 | − 2.11E−5 to 1.57E−5 | − 0.18 | 0.85 |
| PC 18:0_20:3 | − 1.83E−5 | − 7.98E−5 to − 1.43E−5 | − 1.95 | 0.05 |
| SM d18:1/22:0 | − 4.23E−5 | − 7.98E−5 to − 1.43E−5 | − 2.63 | 0.01 |
| SM d18:1/22:1 | − 2.78E−5 | − 6.16E−5 to − 6.22E−6 | − 1.97 | 0.05 |
| SM d18:1/24:0 | − 9.91E−6 | − 3.79E−5 to 1.36E−5 | − 0.79 | 0.43 |
| TG 16:0_16:1_18:1 | − 3.22E−6 | − 1.57E−5 to 7.93E−6 | − 0.57 | 0.57 |
Coefficients for the logistic regression of diagnostic model “control group/RUF group”.
| β | CI β | Z stat | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free coefficient | − 1.24E1 | − 2.33E1 to − 4.82E0 | ||
| PC 16:0_22:6 | 2.09E−6 | 4.36E−7 to 4.10E−6 | 2.28 | 0.02 |
| PC 16:0_18:2 | 2.74E−6 | 1.08E−6 to 6.0E−6 | 2.32 | 0.02 |
| PC 16:0_20:3 | − 1.21E−6 | − 9.00E−6 to 4.16E−6 | − 0.39 | 0.70 |
| PC 18:0_20:3 | 8.17E−6 | − 4.36E−6 to 2.30E−5 | 1.21 | 0.23 |
| SM d12:0/14:1 | 5.32E−6 | 2.17E−6 to 1.03E−5 | 2.64 | 0.01 |
| SM d18:1/24:1 | − 5.74E−6 | − 1.75E−5 to 5.08E−6 | − 1.02 | 0.31 |
| SM d18:2/24:1 | 2.87E−5 | 2.14E−6 to 6.03E−5 | 1.99 | 0.05 |
| PC 18:0_18:1 | − 1.61E−5 | − 3.07E−5 to − 3.74E−6 | − 2.39 | 0.02 |
Figure 4Relative intensity of marker plasma lipids in the OPLS-DA model classifying UF and RUF groups. Orange color corresponds to first-time diagnosed UF, and yellow color corresponds to the RUF. The diagram shows Q1 − 1.5 × IQR, Q1, Me, Q3, Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Black dots correspond to outliers.