Jens Röther1, Maximilian Moshage2, Damini Dey3, Chris Schwemmer4, Monique Tröbs2, Florian Blachutzik2, Stephan Achenbach2, Christian Schlundt2, Mohamed Marwan2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: jens.roether@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA. 4. Computed Tomography - Research & Development, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a novel prototype for on-site determination of CT-based FFR (cFFR) on a standard personal computer (PC) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 91 vessels in 71 patients (mean age 65 ± 9 years) in whom coronary CT angiography had been performed due to suspicion of coronary artery disease, and who subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement were analyzed. For both cFFR and FFR, a threshold of ≤0.80 was used to indicate a hemodynamically relevant stenosis. The mean time needed to calculate cFFR was 12.4 ± 3.4 min. A very close correlation between cFFR and FFR could be shown (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001) with Bland-Altman analysis showing moderate agreement between FFR and cFFR with mild systematic overestimation of FFR values in CT (mean difference 0.0049, 95% limits of agreement ±2SD -0.007 to 0.008). Compared to FFR, the sensitivity of cFFR to detect hemodynamically significant lesions was 91% (19/21, 95% CI: 70%-99%), specificity was 96% (67/70, 95% CI: 88%-99%), positive predictive value 86% (95% CI: 65%-97%) and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 90%-100%) with an accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: cFFR obtained using an on-site algorithm implemented on a standard PC shows high diagnostic accuracy to detect lesions causing ischemia as compared to FFR. Importantly, the time needed for analysis is short which may be useful for improving clinical workflow.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a novel prototype for on-site determination of CT-based FFR (cFFR) on a standard personal computer (PC) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 91 vessels in 71 patients (mean age 65 ± 9 years) in whom coronary CT angiography had been performed due to suspicion of coronary artery disease, and who subsequently underwent invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement were analyzed. For both cFFR and FFR, a threshold of ≤0.80 was used to indicate a hemodynamically relevant stenosis. The mean time needed to calculate cFFR was 12.4 ± 3.4 min. A very close correlation between cFFR and FFR could be shown (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001) with Bland-Altman analysis showing moderate agreement between FFR and cFFR with mild systematic overestimation of FFR values in CT (mean difference 0.0049, 95% limits of agreement ±2SD -0.007 to 0.008). Compared to FFR, the sensitivity of cFFR to detect hemodynamically significant lesions was 91% (19/21, 95% CI: 70%-99%), specificity was 96% (67/70, 95% CI: 88%-99%), positive predictive value 86% (95% CI: 65%-97%) and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 90%-100%) with an accuracy of 93%. CONCLUSION: cFFR obtained using an on-site algorithm implemented on a standard PC shows high diagnostic accuracy to detect lesions causing ischemia as compared to FFR. Importantly, the time needed for analysis is short which may be useful for improving clinical workflow.
Authors: Chun Xiang Tang; Meng Jie Lu; Joseph Uwe Schoepf; Christian Tesche; Maximilian Bauer; John Nance; Parkwood Griffith; Guang Ming Lu; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Yushui Han; Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed; Chris Schwemmer; Myra Cocker; Talal S Alnabelsi; Jean Michel Saad; Juan C Ramirez Giraldo; Mouaz H Al-Mallah Journal: Open Heart Date: 2022-03
Authors: Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Pedro Gonçalves-Teixeira; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Nuno Cardim Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 2.667