Literature DB >> 29408586

A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.

Alison G Cahill1, Methodius G Tuuli2, Molly J Stout2, Julia D López2, George A Macones2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring is the most commonly used tool in obstetrics in the United States; however, which electronic fetal monitoring patterns predict acidemia remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to describe the frequency of patterns seen in labor using modern nomenclature, and to test the hypothesis that visually interpreted patterns are associated with acidemia and morbidities in term infants. We further identified patterns prior to delivery, alone or in combination, predictive of acidemia and neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of 8580 women from 2010 through 2015. Patients were all consecutive women laboring at ≥37 weeks' gestation with a singleton cephalic fetus. Electronic fetal monitoring patterns during the 120 minutes prior to delivery were interpreted in 10-minute epochs. Interpretation included the category system and individual electronic fetal monitoring patterns per the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria as well as novel patterns. The primary outcome was fetal acidemia (umbilical artery pH ≤7.10); neonatal morbidities were also assessed. Final regression models for acidemia adjusted for nulliparity, pregestational diabetes, and advanced maternal age. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the test characteristics of individual models for acidemia and neonatal morbidity.
RESULTS: Of 8580 women, 149 (1.7%) delivered acidemic infants. Composite neonatal morbidity was diagnosed in 757 (8.8%) neonates within the total cohort. Persistent category I, and 10-minute period of category III, were significantly associated with normal pH and acidemia, respectively. Total deceleration area was most discriminative of acidemia (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.80), and deceleration area with any 10 minutes of tachycardia had the greatest discriminative ability for neonatal morbidity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.79). Once the threshold of deceleration area is reached the number of cesareans needed-to-be performed to potentially prevent 1 case of acidemia and morbidity is 5 and 6, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Deceleration area is the most predictive electronic fetal monitoring pattern for acidemia, and combined with tachycardia for significant risk of morbidity, from the electronic fetal monitoring patterns studied. It is important to acknowledge that this study was performed in patients delivering ≥37 weeks, which may limit the generalizability to preterm populations. We also did not use computerized analysis of the electronic fetal monitoring patterns because human visual interpretation was the basis for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development categories, and importantly, it is how electronic fetal monitoring is used clinically.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acidemia; deceleration area; electronic fetal monitoring; neonatal morbidity; pregnancy; term infants

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29408586      PMCID: PMC5916338          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  44 in total

1.  Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association?

Authors:  J T Parer; T King; S Flanders; M Fox; S J Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2006-05

2.  Deceleration area of fetal heart rate trace and fetal acidemia at delivery: a case-control study.

Authors:  Stefano Raffaele Giannubilo; Giorgia Buscicchio; Lucia Gentilucci; Gian Paolo Palla; Andrea Luigi Tranquilli
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2007-02

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Han-Yang Chen; Suneet P Chauhan; Cande V Ananth; Anthony M Vintzileos; Alfred Z Abuhamad
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VIII. Atypical variable decelerations.

Authors:  H B Krebs; R E Petres; L J Dunn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Sympathetic neural activation does not mediate heart rate variability during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep.

Authors:  Christopher A Lear; Robert Galinsky; Guido Wassink; Clinton J Mitchell; Joanne O Davidson; Jennifer A Westgate; Laura Bennet; Alistair J Gunn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Association between umbilical blood gas parameters and neonatal morbidity and death in neonates with pathologic fetal acidemia.

Authors:  R L Andres; G Saade; L C Gilstrap; I Wilkins; A Witlin; F Zlatnik; G V Hankins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; Emily F Hamilton; Thomas J Garite; Audra Timmins; Philip A Warrick; Samuel Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy.

Authors:  K B Nelson; J M Dambrosia; T Y Ting; J K Grether
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The Regional Centralization of Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and Its Impact on Neonatal Acidemia and the Cesarean Birth Rate.

Authors:  Kaori Michikata; Hiroshi Sameshima; Hirotoshi Urabe; Syuichi Tokunaga; Yuki Kodama; Tsuyomu Ikenoue
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2016-06-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  The transition from latent to active labor and adverse obstetrical outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua I Rosenbloom; Candice L Woolfolk; Leping Wan; Molly J Stout; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Neonatal Morbidity in the Offspring of Obese Women Without Hypertension or Diabetes.

Authors:  Brock E Polnaszek; Nandini Raghuraman; Julia D Lopez; Antonina L Frolova; Victoria Wesevich; Methodius G Tuuli; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Computer-based intrapartum fetal monitoring and beyond: A review of the 2nd Workshop on Signal Processing and Monitoring in Labor (October 2017, Oxford, UK).

Authors:  Antoniya Georgieva; Patrice Abry; Václav Chudáček; Petar M Djurić; Martin G Frasch; René Kok; Christopher A Lear; Sebastiaan N Lemmens; Inês Nunes; Aris T Papageorghiou; Gerald J Quirk; Christopher W G Redman; Barry Schifrin; Jiri Spilka; Austin Ugwumadu; Rik Vullings
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  The peripheral chemoreflex: indefatigable guardian of fetal physiological adaptation to labour.

Authors:  Christopher A Lear; Guido Wassink; Jenny A Westgate; Jan G Nijhuis; Austin Ugwumadu; Robert Galinsky; Laura Bennet; Alistair J Gunn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The relationship between maternal anemia and umbilical cord oxygen content at delivery.

Authors:  Virginia Y Watkins; Antonina I Frolova; Molly J Stout; Ebony B Carter; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill; Nandini Raghuraman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-10-22

6.  Marked variability in intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate patterns: association with neonatal morbidity and abnormal arterial cord gas.

Authors:  Brock Polnaszek; Julia D López; Reece Clark; Nandini Raghuraman; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  True knot at the time of delivery: electronic fetal monitoring characteristics and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Cheryl S Chu; Zach Thompson; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Elevated umbilical cord arterial lactate at birth and electronic fetal monitoring characteristics on admission and in the active phase.

Authors:  Joshua I Rosenbloom; Molly J Stout; Methodius G Tuuli; Julia D López; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Reply to the "Letter to the Editor: measurement of fetal parasympathetic activity during labor: a new pathway for evaluation of fetal well-being?"

Authors:  Christopher A Lear; Jenny A Westgate; Michi Kasai; Michael J Beacom; Yoshiki Maeda; Shoichi Magawa; Etsuko Miyagi; Tomoaki Ikeda; Laura Bennet; Alistair J Gunn
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Electronic Fetal Monitoring Credentialing Examination: The First 4000.

Authors:  Mark W Tomlinson; Sara A Brumbaugh; Marin O'Keeffe; Richard L Berkowitz; Mary D'Alton; Michael Nageotte
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.