Literature DB >> 21752753

Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States.

Han-Yang Chen1, Suneet P Chauhan, Cande V Ananth, Anthony M Vintzileos, Alfred Z Abuhamad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and neonatal and infant mortality, as well as neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the United States 2004 linked birth and infant death data. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate risk ratio for association between electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and mortality, while adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: In 2004, 89% of singleton pregnancies had electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring was associated with significantly lower infant mortality (adjusted relative risk, 0.75); this was mainly driven by the lower risk of early neonatal mortality (adjusted relative risk, 0.50). In low-risk pregnancies, electronic fetal heart rate monitoring was associated with decreased risk for Apgar scores <4 at 5 minutes (relative risk, 0.54); in high-risk pregnancies, with decreased risk of neonatal seizures (relative risk, 0.65).
CONCLUSION: In the United States, the use of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring was associated with a substantial decrease in early neonatal mortality and morbidity that lowered infant mortality.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752753     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Relation of fetal heart rate signals with unassignable baseline to poor neonatal state at birth.

Authors:  A Georgieva; S J Payne; M Moulden; C W G Redman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Declan Devane; Gillian Ml Gyte; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-03

3.  A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Julia D López; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Institutional and Cultural Perspectives on Home Birth in Israel.

Authors:  Michal Rosie Meroz; Anat Gesser-Edelsburg
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

5.  Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.

Authors:  Lisa Heelan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Pulmonary Resilience: Moderating the Association between Oxygen Exposure and Pulmonary Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Newborns.

Authors:  Urvi Jhaveri Sanghvi; Clyde J Wright; Teri L Hernandez
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.106

7.  Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010.

Authors:  J A Lavery; A M Friedman; K M Keyes; J D Wright; C V Ananth
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Comparison of vibro-acoustic stimulation and acupressure effects in nonstress test results and its parameters in pregnant women.

Authors:  Valiani Mahboubeh; Pirhadi Masoumeh; Shahshahan Zahra
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-07

9.  New estimators and guidelines for better use of fetal heart rate estimators with Doppler ultrasound devices.

Authors:  Iulian Voicu; Sébastien Ménigot; Denis Kouamé; Jean-Marc Girault
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha Monson; Cara Heuser; Brett D Einerson; Isaac Esplin; Greg Snow; Michael Varner; M Sean Esplin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.