Literature DB >> 2940709

Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. III. Employee-related factors.

S J Bigos, D M Spengler, N A Martin, J Zeh, L Fisher, A Nachemson.   

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of back injuries on industry, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of injuries occurring among a group of 31,200 employees of The Boeing Company, a large industrial manufacturer in Western Washington. They analyzed 4,645 injury claims (including 900 back injuries) made by 3,958 different employees. Two previous articles give an overview of the study, provide a detailed analysis of the costs associated with these back injuries, and analyze the characteristics of the injury. This article focuses on employee-related factors associated with back injuries. Claims were categorized according to severity, as indicated by total incurred cost (TIC), the sum of the medical costs, and indemnity costs. High-cost claims were defined as those with a TIC greater than $10,000 and low-cost claims as those with a TIC less than $10,000. Employees younger than 25 years of age had a statistically significant increased risk of back injury, although their claims tended to be low-cost ones. This finding tends to discredit the premise that back problems are related to aging of the lumbar spine. While older employees had a lower injury rate, they did have a significantly increased risk of incurring high-cost back injury claims. The 31-40-year age group was the most susceptible to high-cost back injuries. Newer employees tended to have a significantly increased risk of back injury. The data show that women had fewer injuries than men but a statistically significant increased risk of becoming a high-cost injury claim.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2940709     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

Review 1.  Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms.

Authors:  D S Bell
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

2.  Biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors predicting low back functional impairment among furniture distribution employees.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; W Gary Allread; Deborah L Burr; Catherine Heaney; William S Marras
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction.

Authors:  Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Industrial back belts and low back pain: Mechanisms and outcomes.

Authors:  B A Barron; M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-09

5.  Low back pain in Hispanic residential carpenters.

Authors:  David P Gilkey; Brian A Enebo; Thomas J Keefe; Martha Soledad Vela Acosta; Jacob E Hautaluoma; Philip L Bigelow; John Rosecrance; Robert E Herron
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2007-03

6.  Chronic Disability Syndrome: Failing to diagnose disability can jeoparadize rehabilitation.

Authors:  B L Gamborg; W S Elliott; K W Curtis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Clinical approaches to low back pain. Part 2. Management, sequelae, and disability and compensation.

Authors:  R W Teasell; K White
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study.

Authors:  A F Bendix; T Bendix; S Ostenfeld; E Bush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outpatient rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders using structured workplace description.

Authors:  Stephan W Weiler; Kay Peter Foeh; Anke van Mark; Rene Touissant; Nina Sonntag; Annette Gaessler; Johannes Schulze; Richard Kessel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Evaluation of impairment related to low back pain.

Authors:  J R Langworthy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.