BACKGROUND: Biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors for low back disorder have been studied extensively however few researchers have examined all three risk factors. The objective of this was to develop a low back disorder risk model in furniture distribution workers using biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors. METHODS: This was a prospective study with a six month follow-up time. There were 454 subjects at 9 furniture distribution facilities enrolled in the study. Biomechanical exposure was evaluated using the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (2001) lifting threshold limit values for low back injury risk. Psychosocial and individual risk factors were evaluated via questionnaires. Low back health functional status was measured using the lumbar motion monitor. Low back disorder cases were defined as a loss of low back functional performance of -0.14 or more. FINDINGS: There were 92 cases of meaningful loss in low back functional performance and 185 non cases. A multivariate logistic regression model included baseline functional performance probability, facility, perceived workload, intermediated reach distance number of exertions above threshold limit values, job tenure manual material handling, and age combined to provide a model sensitivity of 68.5% and specificity of 71.9%. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study indicate which biomechanical, individual and psychosocial risk factors are important as well as how much of each risk factor is too much resulting in increased risk of low back disorder among furniture distribution workers.
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors for low back disorder have been studied extensively however few researchers have examined all three risk factors. The objective of this was to develop a low back disorder risk model in furniture distribution workers using biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors. METHODS: This was a prospective study with a six month follow-up time. There were 454 subjects at 9 furniture distribution facilities enrolled in the study. Biomechanical exposure was evaluated using the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (2001) lifting threshold limit values for low back injury risk. Psychosocial and individual risk factors were evaluated via questionnaires. Low back health functional status was measured using the lumbar motion monitor. Low back disorder cases were defined as a loss of low back functional performance of -0.14 or more. FINDINGS: There were 92 cases of meaningful loss in low back functional performance and 185 non cases. A multivariate logistic regression model included baseline functional performance probability, facility, perceived workload, intermediated reach distance number of exertions above threshold limit values, job tenure manual material handling, and age combined to provide a model sensitivity of 68.5% and specificity of 71.9%. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study indicate which biomechanical, individual and psychosocial risk factors are important as well as how much of each risk factor is too much resulting in increased risk of low back disorder among furniture distribution workers.
Authors: Francesco S Violante; Francesca Graziosi; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefania Curti; Stefano Mattioli Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: W S Marras; S A Ferguson; P Gupta; S Bose; M Parnianpour; J Y Kim; R R Crowell Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: William S Marras; Sue A Ferguson; Deborah Burr; Pete Schabo; Anthony Maronitis Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Daniel Steffens; Chris G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira; Mark J Hancock; Timothy Glass; Jane Latimer Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-12-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Alberto Ofenhejm Gotfryd; Edgar Santiago Valesin Filho; Dan Carai Maia Viola; Mario Lenza; Joselito Adriano da Silva; Angélica Santos Emi; Raylton Tomiosso; Carla de Azevedo Piccinato; Eliane Antonioli; Mario Ferretti Journal: Einstein (Sao Paulo) Date: 2015 Apr-Jun
Authors: Patricia do Carmo Silva Parreira; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Daniel Steffens; Fiona Blyth; Qiang Li; Manuela L Ferreira Journal: Pain Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 7.926