Literature DB >> 24512654

Reduced anticoagulation after mechanical aortic valve replacement: interim results from the prospective randomized on-X valve anticoagulation clinical trial randomized Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial.

John Puskas1, Marc Gerdisch2, Dennis Nichols3, Reed Quinn4, Charles Anderson3, Birger Rhenman5, Lilibeth Fermin5, Michael McGrath6, Bobby Kong7, Chad Hughes8, Gulshan Sethi9, Michael Wait10, Tomas Martin11, Allen Graeve3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Under Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption, the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT) has been testing the safety of less aggressive anticoagulation than recommended by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines after implantation of an approved bileaflet mechanical valve.
METHODS: In this first limb of the PROACT, patients with elevated risk factors for thromboembolism were randomized at 33 US centers to receive lower dose warfarin (test international normalized ratio [INR], 1.5-2.0) or continue standard warfarin (control INR, 2.0-3.0), 3 months after mechanical aortic valve replacement. The INR was adjusted by home monitoring; all patients received 81 mg aspirin daily. Adverse events were independently adjudicated.
RESULTS: A total of 375 aortic valve replacement patients were randomized into control (n = 190) and test (n = 185) groups from September 2006 to December 2009. The mean age ± standard deviation was 55.2 ± 12.5 years; 79% were men; and 93% were in sinus rhythm preoperatively. Calcific degeneration was present in 67%; active endocarditis was excluded. Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting (27%), aortic aneurysm repair (14%), and other (25%). The follow-up duration averaged 3.82 years (755.7 patient-years [pt-yrs] for control; 675.2 pt-yrs for test). The mean INR was 2.50 ± 0.63 for the control and 1.89 ± 0.49 for the test groups (P < .0001). The test group experienced significantly lower major (1.48% vs 3.26%/pt-yr; P = .047) and minor (1.32% vs 3.41%/pt-yr; P = .021) bleeding rates. The incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, total neurologic events, and all-cause mortality were similar between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: INR can be safely maintained between 1.5 and 2.0 after aortic valve replacement with this approved bileaflet mechanical prosthesis. With low-dose aspirin, this resulted in a significantly lower risk of bleeding, without a significant increase in thromboembolism.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512654     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  36 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: Overview of Mechanical and Tissue Prostheses, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Implications for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Amy G Fiedler; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 2.  Bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation in congenital heart disease-important aspects for treatment with focus on aortic vasculopathy.

Authors:  Christoph Sinning; Elvin Zengin; Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann; Stefan Blankenberg; Carsten Rickers; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Aortic valve repair in adult congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Evaldas Girdauskas; Johannes Petersen; Jörg Sachweh; Rainer Kozlik-Feldmann; Christoph Sinning; Carsten Rickers; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Hermann Reichenspurner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

Review 4.  Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Steffen Bargenda; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; Sophie Tkebuchava; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults: looking beyond the tree that hides the forest.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Maral Ouzounian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

6.  Anticoagulant independent mechanical heart valves: viable now or still a distant holy grail.

Authors:  Aurelio Chaux; Richard J Gray; Jonathan C Stupka; Michael R Emken; Lawrence N Scotten; Rolland Siegel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

7.  Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Rodolfo V Rocha; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Maral Ouzounian; Bobby Yanagawa; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  10-year results of On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve in the aortic position: low target INR regimen in Japanese.

Authors:  Hideki Teshima; Masahiko Ikebuchi; Yosuke Miyamoto; Ryuta Tai; Toshikazu Sano; Yusuke Kinugasa; Hiroyuki Irie
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-19

9.  Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.

Authors:  Eric J Keller; S Chris Malaisrie; Jane Kruse; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-30

10.  [Antiplatelet or anticoagulative strategies after surgical/interventional valve treatment].

Authors:  A Jobs; T Stiermaier; S Klotz; I Eitel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.