Literature DB >> 29399592

Rule-based and Word-level Statistics-based Processing of Language: Insights from Neuroscience.

Nai Ding1,2,3, Lucia Melloni4,5, Xing Tian6,7, David Poeppel8,9.   

Abstract

To flexibly convey meaning, the human language faculty iteratively combines smaller units such as words into larger structures such as phrases based on grammatical principles. During comprehension, however, it remains unclear how the brain encodes the relationship between words and combines them into phrases. One hypothesis is that internal grammatical principles governing language generation are also used to parse the hierarchical syntactic structure of spoken language during comprehension. An alternative hypothesis suggests, in contrast, that decoding language during comprehension solely relies on statistical relationships between words or strings of words, i.e., the N-gram statistics, while grammatical rules are not used and no hierarchical linguistic structures are constructed. Here, we briefly review distinctions between rule-based hierarchical models and statistics-based linear string models for comprehension, and how the neurolinguistic approach can shed light on this debate. Recent neurolinguistic studies show that tracking of probabilistic relationships between words is not sufficient to explain cortical encoding of linguistic constituent structure and support the involvement of rule-based processing during language comprehension.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29399592      PMCID: PMC5794029          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  27 in total

1.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information.

Authors:  A D Friederici; M Meyer; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.

Authors:  Jos J A van Berkum; Pienie Zwitserlood; Peter Hagoort; Colin M Brown
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10

4.  Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Thomas A Farmer; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-13

Review 5.  Structures, Not Strings: Linguistics as Part of the Cognitive Sciences.

Authors:  Martin B H Everaert; Marinus A C Huybregts; Noam Chomsky; Robert C Berwick; Johan J Bolhuis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Christopher D Manning
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

Authors:  R Näätänen; P Paavilainen; T Rinne; K Alho
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  How hierarchical is language use?

Authors:  Stefan L Frank; Rens Bod; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Long-term implicit memory for sequential auditory patterns in humans.

Authors:  Roberta Bianco; Peter Mc Harrison; Mingyue Hu; Cora Bolger; Samantha Picken; Marcus T Pearce; Maria Chait
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Artificial grammar learning in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in varying stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Justin M London; Michael J Flynn; Deborah D Rupert; Owen Alldritt; Caleb Hyde
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.

Authors:  Peiqing Jin; Yuhan Lu; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Hierarchical structure guides rapid linguistic predictions during naturalistic listening.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; John T Hale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.