| Literature DB >> 29399449 |
Jarret M Woodmass1, Heath P Melugin1, Isabella T Wu1, Daniel B F Saris1,2,3, Michael J Stuart1, Aaron J Krych1.
Abstract
Isolated cartilage defects can lead to significant pain and disability, prompting the development of a number of options for restorative treatment. Each method has advantages and limitations, and no single technique has gained widespread use. We present a technique for implantation of a cryopreserved osteochondral allograft (Cartiform) for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects. Cartiform is a cryopreserved osteochondral allograft composed of chondrocytes, chondrogenic growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins. This implant allows for regenerative treatment of full-thickness cartilage lesions in a single surgical procedure.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29399449 PMCID: PMC5793487 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Indications and Contraindications for the Described Technique
| Indications | Contraindications |
|---|---|
| Isolated, full-thickness cartilage defect of the knee | Significant subchondral bone loss >5 mm |
| Defects size 1-2 cm2 | Femoral defect with uncorrected malalignment, meniscal deficiency or ligament instability |
| Primary or revision cases | Patellar defect with uncorrected maltracking |
| Contained lesions | Uncontained lesions |
Equipment Required to Perform a Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation
| Special Equipment/Instrumentation |
|---|
| Donor site preparation |
| - Ring curette |
| - PowerPick microdrilling system |
| - Cartiform viable osteochondral allograft implant |
| - 2.5-mm PushLock anchors (×3-4) |
| - 4-0 Monocryl suture (×3-4) |
| - 6-0 absorbable suture |
| - Fibrin glue |
Fig 1Cartiform implant (Arthrex).
Pearls and Pitfalls
| Pearls | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
| Perform a diagnostic arthroscopy to ensure patient is a candidate prior to arthrotomy and opening of the implant | Performing an unnecessary arthrotomy to find a contraindication (e.g., subchondral defect) |
| Debride cartilage back to stable vertical borders and remove diseased surrounding cartilage | Failure to debride cartilage to create a contained lesion |
| Maintain 2-3 mm osseous bridges between drill holes | Creating a subchondral defect as a result of tunnel coalition between microfracture sites |
| Regularly assess the orientation of the allograft during preparation and implantation | Incongruent graft placement or loss of graft suitability as a result of error in orientation/preparation |
Fig 2Intraoperative images of a left knee (supine positioning) with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy. A 2 × 2-cm full-thickness cartilage defect on the undersurface of the patella is being prepared for Cartiform implantation. (A) A curette is being used to debride the pathologic cartilage to a stable border peripherally with removal of the calcified cartilage layer. (B) Microdrilling of the defect leaving 3- to 4-mm osseous bridges between drill holes (blue arrow). (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; QT, quadriceps tendon.)
Fig 3Intraoperative images of the left knee (supine positioning) with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy showing Cartiform implantation into a full-thickness cartilage defect on the undersurface of the patella. (A) A 2-mm hole is drilled for suture anchor placement (1 of 3 suture anchors). (B) A PushLock (Arthrex) anchor is being advanced into place after the suture has been passed through the implant. (black vertical arrow, PushLock anchor; blue horizontal arrow, Cartiform implant; QT, quadriceps tendon.)
Fig 4Intra-operative images of a left knee (supine positioning) with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy. A Cartiform implant has been secured into a 2 × 2-cm full-thickness cartilage defect on the undersurface of the patella. (blue horizontal arrow, Cartiform implant; LFC, lateral femoral condyle; QT, quadriceps tendon.)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft Implantation
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Single operation | Single implant limits to a 2-cm-diameter defect |
| No donor site morbidity | Unable to fill/restore a large osseous defect |
| Allograft is flexible and can contour to match lesion size/shape. | Theoretical risks with allograft tissue of disease transmission |
| Off the shelf use with long shelf-life | Unknown if subchondral bone should be microfractured or not to optimize ingrowth conditions |