Literature DB >> 32037873

Prospective Outcomes of Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft for Patellofemoral Cartilage Defects at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Heath P Melugin1, Taylor J Ridley2, Christopher D Bernard1, Dillen Wischmeier3, Jack Farr3, Michael J Stuart1, Jeffrey A Macalena2, Aaron J Krych1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical outcomes, knee function, and activity level of patients after treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment of the knee with cryopreserved osteochondral allograft.
DESIGN: Nineteen patients with cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment were treated. The average age was 31 years (range 15-45 years), including 12 females and 7 males. Patients were prospectively followed using validated clinical outcome measures including Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Tegner activity scale. Graft incorporation was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or second-look arthroscopy.
RESULTS: The cartilage defects included the patella (n = 16) and the femoral trochlea (n = 3). Mean VR-12 scores increased from 31.6 to 46.3 (P < 0.01), mean IKDC increased from 40.0 to 69.7 (P < 0.01), mean KOOS increased from 53.9 to 80.2 (P < 0.01), and mean Tegner scores increased from 3.0 to 4.9 (P < 0.01), at average follow-up of 41.9 months (range 24-62 months). Of the 3 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, all demonstrated a well-incorporated graft. Mean MOCART score for the 6 patients with follow-up MRI was 62.5 (range 25-85). The reoperation rate was 21.1% and 2 patients (12.5%) experienced progressive patellofemoral osteoarthritis requiring conversion to patellofemoral arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION: Patients with unipolar cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment of the knee can have positive outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up after surgical treatment with a cryopreserved osteochondral allograft when concomitant pathology is also addressed, but the reoperation rate is high and bipolar cartilage lesions may increase the failure rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chondral lesions; cryopreserved osteochondral allograft; full-thickness cartilage defect; knee arthroscopy; patellofemoral compartment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32037873      PMCID: PMC8808817          DOI: 10.1177/1947603520903420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  28 in total

1.  Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies.

Authors:  W W Curl; J Krome; E S Gordon; J Rushing; B P Smith; G G Poehling
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Tibial Tubercle Osteotomies: a Review of a Treatment for Recurrent Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Nathan L Grimm; Alexander L Lazarides; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability.

Authors:  Lars Peterson; Mats Brittberg; Illka Kiviranta; Evy Lundgren Akerlund; Anders Lindahl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Ayoosh Pareek; Alexander H King; Nick R Johnson; Michael J Stuart; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee.

Authors:  T Minas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  M Brittberg; A Lindahl; A Nilsson; C Ohlsson; O Isaksson; L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A novel, cryopreserved, viable osteochondral allograft designed to augment marrow stimulation for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Sandra Geraghty; Jin-Qiang Kuang; Dana Yoo; Michelle LeRoux-Williams; C Thomas Vangsness; Alla Danilkovitch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Current concepts of articular cartilage restoration techniques in the knee.

Authors:  Christopher L Camp; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Articular cartilage repair using marrow stimulation augmented with a viable chondral allograft: 9-month postoperative histological evaluation.

Authors:  James K Hoffman; Sandra Geraghty; Nicole M Protzman
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-01-01

10.  Responsiveness Comparison of the EQ-5D, PROMIS Global Health, and VR-12 Questionnaires in Knee Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sameer R Oak; Gregory J Strnad; James Bena; Lutul D Farrow; Richard D Parker; Morgan H Jones; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-17
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation and Return-to-Play Criteria After Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael Stark; Somnath Rao; Brendan Gleason; Robert A Jack; Bradford Tucker; Sommer Hammoud; Kevin B Freedman
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.