Literature DB >> 29395713

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against contemporary Gram-positive and -negative organisms collected from Europe (2015).

M A Pfaller1, R K Flamm2, L R Duncan2, J M Streit2, M Castanheira2, H S Sader2.   

Abstract

Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 12,240 isolates was performed following CLSI/EUCAST guidelines. The percentage of susceptible MRSA isolates was higher for ceftobiprole (96.5% susceptible) than for ceftaroline (86.2% susceptible). Both ceftobiprole (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) and ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) demonstrated potent activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90 values of 0.5/2 mg/L); ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 2/8 mg/L) was 4-fold less active against these strains. Ceftobiprole activity was comparable to that of the other β-lactam agents tested against S. pneumoniae (MIC90, 0.5 mg/L vs 0.12-2 mg/L [other β-lactams]), viridans-group streptococci (MIC90,0.25 mg/L vs 0.006-1 mg/L [other β-lactams]), and β-hemolytic streptococci (MIC90,0.03 mg/L vs 0.015-0.06 mg/L [other β-lactams]). Overall, 73.8% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 70.4% of P. aeruginosa at ≤4 mg/L and all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis at ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole was active in vitro against a broad range of clinically-relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Ceftobiprole; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29395713     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  12 in total

1.  High Rate of Ceftobiprole Resistance among Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from a Hospital in Central Italy.

Authors:  Gianluca Morroni; Andrea Brenciani; Lucia Brescini; Simona Fioriti; Serena Simoni; Antonella Pocognoli; Marina Mingoia; Eleonora Giovanetti; Francesco Barchiesi; Andrea Giacometti; Oscar Cirioni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018.

Authors:  Robert K Flamm; Leonard R Duncan; Kamal A Hamed; Jennifer I Smart; Rodrigo E Mendes; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ceftobiprole Activity against Gram-Positive and -Negative Pathogens Collected from the United States in 2006 and 2016.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Robert K Flamm; Rodrigo E Mendes; Jennifer M Streit; Jennifer I Smart; Kamal A Hamed; Leonard R Duncan; Helio S Sader
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Susceptibility to ceftobiprole of respiratory-tract pathogens collected in the United Kingdom and Ireland during 2014-2015.

Authors:  Anne Santerre Henriksen; Jennifer I Smart; Kamal Hamed
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Possible clinical indications of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  J Barberán
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 6.  Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.

Authors:  M I Morosini; M Díez-Aguilar; R Cantón
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 7.  Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications.

Authors:  Tommaso Lupia; Carlo Pallotto; Silvia Corcione; Lucio Boglione; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08

Review 8.  Ceftobiprole: a clinical view.

Authors:  P M Martínez Pérez-Crespo; L E López Cortés
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  [Integral approach to the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Authors:  J González Del Castillo; F J Candel; J de la Fuente; F Gordo; F J Martín-Sánchez; R Menéndez; A Mujal; J Barberán
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.553

Review 10.  Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Elena Xu; David Pérez-Torres; Paraskevi C Fragkou; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Despoina Koulenti
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.